Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
Oppenheim: Unfair Trade Practices, Cases And Comments, Glen E. Weston
Oppenheim: Unfair Trade Practices, Cases And Comments, Glen E. Weston
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Unfair Trade Practices, Cases and Comments by S. Chesterfield Oppenheim
Phillips: Perspectives On Antitrust Policy, Edwin W. Tucker
Phillips: Perspectives On Antitrust Policy, Edwin W. Tucker
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Perspectives on Antitrust Policy edited by Almarin Phillips
The Relativity Of Economic Evidence In Merger Cases-Emerging Decisions Force The Issue, Betty Bock
The Relativity Of Economic Evidence In Merger Cases-Emerging Decisions Force The Issue, Betty Bock
Michigan Law Review
The following discussion explores the interaction between law and economics as these two disciplines relate to the issues which arise under section 7 of the Clayton Act, as amended in 1950, and examines the correlative problems implicit in the working arrangements between lawyers and economists when they are asked to counsel an enforcement agency or an acquiring or acquired company concerning the potential competitive consequences of a merger.
Tying Arrangement With Trademark As The Tying Item Is Not A Per Se Violation Of The Antitrust Laws-Susser V. Carvel Corp., Michigan Law Review
Tying Arrangement With Trademark As The Tying Item Is Not A Per Se Violation Of The Antitrust Laws-Susser V. Carvel Corp., Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
Several independent franchised soft ice-cream outlets brought suit for treble damages against Carvel Corporation, the franchising company, alleging that the contract between them constituted an illegal tying arrangement in violation of section 3 of the Clayton Act and sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act. The contract bound the dealers to purchase from Carvel-appointed suppliers all commodities sold as part of the retail dairy composite. Plaintiffs stipulated that they would rely on per se violations at trial. The district court found that the plaintiffs had failed to show the alleged violations and, in any case, the defendant had proved …