Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
Antitrust, Michael Eric Ross, John C. Staton Jr.
Antitrust, Michael Eric Ross, John C. Staton Jr.
Mercer Law Review
In broadest terms, the performance of the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit' in the antitrust area ' during 1976 might best be characterized as solid. Although demonstrating little of the innovative yet well-reasoned analysis which distinguished several 1975 decisions, none of this year's antitrust opinions appear to be as susceptible to criticism as were, for example, Eastex Aviation, Inc. v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co. and Cooper Liquor, Inc. v. Adolph Coors Co. Indeed, a substantial portion of the "development" of the substantive law in 1976 consisted of the court's attempts to "clarify" some of the implications …
Antitrust And State Action: Lights Out For A Regulated Utility, Richard W. Pierce
Antitrust And State Action: Lights Out For A Regulated Utility, Richard W. Pierce
Mercer Law Review
In Cantor v. Detroit Edison, the U.S. Supreme Court held that a power utility regulated by the State of Michigan is not immune from federal antitrust liability, even though the Michigan Public Service Commission had approved the utility's activity under attack-a light-bulb program for customers-and the utility by state law had to maintain the program until it filed a new tariff with the Commission.