Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Sherman Act (2)
- AT&T (1)
- Albrecht v. Herald Co. (1)
- Annual Survey of Virginia Law (1)
- Binder v. Washington Gas-District of Columbia Division (1)
-
- British Telecom (1)
- Brown Shoe v. United States (1)
- Brown v. Pro Football (1)
- Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp. (1)
- Dehoney v. South Carolina Department of Corrections (1)
- Eastern R.R. Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight (1)
- Estate Construction Co. v. Miller & Smith Holding Co. (1)
- FCC (1)
- Forest Ambulance Services v. Mercy Ambulance of Richmond (1)
- Howerton v. Grace Hospital (1)
- ICC (1)
- Joel Klein (1)
- Khan v. State Oil Co. (1)
- Klehr v. Smith Corp. (1)
- M&M Medical Supplies & Services Inc. v. Pleasant Valley Hospital (1)
- MCI (1)
- MFJ (1)
- Mann-Elkins Act (1)
- Martinez v. Roig (1)
- McCaw (1)
- Mid-West Paper Products Co. v. Continental Group Inc. (1)
- Missouri v. American Cyanamid Co. (1)
- Monsanto Co. v. Spray-Rite Service Corp. (1)
- Montgomery County Ass'n of Realtors v. Realty Photo Master Corp. (1)
- NASDAQ (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Antitrust: Will It Change The Lives Of Telecommunications Executives?, Deborah V. Ellenberg, Glen O. Robinson, Michael F. Urbanski, James R. Wade
Antitrust: Will It Change The Lives Of Telecommunications Executives?, Deborah V. Ellenberg, Glen O. Robinson, Michael F. Urbanski, James R. Wade
Richmond Journal of Law & Technology
Good afternoon. This is the last panel of the afternoon. I would like to introduce myself. I'm Deborah Ellenberg, one of the hearing examiners at the State Corporation Commission, and I might add, who has a heightened appreciation for the Virginia Commission's wise decision to handle those arbitrations. I am sure on behalf of Howard, Glenn and myself, we thank you for that decision.
Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Antitrust And Trade Regulation Law, Michael F. Urbanski, Francis H. Casola, James R. Creekmore
Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Antitrust And Trade Regulation Law, Michael F. Urbanski, Francis H. Casola, James R. Creekmore
University of Richmond Law Review
Consistent with the recent national trend, antitrust claims in Virginia met with little success in Virginia's courts over the past two years. Not only have the number of antitrust complaints dwindled, but those that are filed are routinely dismissed on the pleadings or by means of summary judgment after discovery. Recent antitrust conspiracy actions have failed for a variety of fundamental reasons, including a lack of standing to bring the action and a lack of a multiplicity of actors capable of engaging in a conspiracy. On the whole, monopolization claims fared no better, and have been dismissed largely because of …
University Of Richmond Law Review
University Of Richmond Law Review
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.