Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Antitrust (3)
- Antitrust guidelines (2)
- FTC (2)
- Antitrust fines (1)
- Antitrust presumptions (1)
-
- Cartel fines (1)
- Cartel overcharges (1)
- Competition law (1)
- Consumer choice (1)
- Economic efficiency (1)
- European Competition law (1)
- Exclusivity (1)
- FDA (1)
- FTC Act (1)
- FTC guidelines (1)
- Federal Trade Commission (1)
- High-quality journalism (1)
- Hybrid media (1)
- Internet (1)
- Internet media (1)
- Journalism awards (1)
- Market definition (1)
- Media awards (1)
- New media (1)
- Newspaper awards (1)
- Off-label (1)
- Old media (1)
- Overcharge presumptions (1)
- Patent (1)
- Pharmaceutical (1)
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Law
Recent Journalism Awards Won By "Old," "New," And "Hybrid" Media, Robert H. Lande, Thomas J. Horton, Virginia Callahan
Recent Journalism Awards Won By "Old," "New," And "Hybrid" Media, Robert H. Lande, Thomas J. Horton, Virginia Callahan
All Faculty Scholarship
This compares the quality of the "old" media to that of the "new" media by determining how often each type of media source wins major journalism awards. It divides media sources into three categories: old, new and hybrid. New media is limited to publications that were started purely as online news publications. Old media is classified in the traditional sense to include such newspapers as the New York Times. Hybrid media combines elements of both new and old media. Our research compares the number of Pulitzer Prizes and other major journalism awards won by these three types of media sources …
Non-Price Competition In “Substitute" Drugs: The Ftc's Blind Spot, Gregory Dolin
Non-Price Competition In “Substitute" Drugs: The Ftc's Blind Spot, Gregory Dolin
All Faculty Scholarship
As the recent case of United States v. Lundbeck illustrates, the Federal Trade Commission’s lack of knowledge in medical and pharmacological sciences affects its evaluation of transactions between medical and pharmaceutical companies that involve transfers of rights to manufacture or sell drugs, causing the agency to object to such transactions without solid basis for doing so. This article argues that in order to properly define a pharmaceutical market, one must not just consider the condition that competing drugs are meant to treat, but also take into account whether there are “off-label” drugs that are used to treat a relevant condition, …
Comments To The U.S. Sentencing Commission Concerning Antitrust Fines, Robert H. Lande
Comments To The U.S. Sentencing Commission Concerning Antitrust Fines, Robert H. Lande
All Faculty Scholarship
This Comment was submitted to the US Sentencing Commission on behalf of the American Antitrust Institute. It makes three important points, all of which concern the US Sentencing Commission's Antitrust Guidelines' cartel overcharge presumption.
First, the evidence demonstrates there currently is significant underdeterrence of price fixing and other anticompetitive forms of collusion. Second, the general approach to calculating cartel fines embodied in the US Sentencing Commission Guidelines, under which the enforcers and ultimately the courts calculate antitrust fines based upon a very specific presumed overcharge, is sound and in the public interest. Third, the 10% cartel overcharge presumption in the …
Should Section 5 Guidelines Focus On Economic Efficiency Or Consumer Choice?, Robert H. Lande
Should Section 5 Guidelines Focus On Economic Efficiency Or Consumer Choice?, Robert H. Lande
All Faculty Scholarship
FTC Commissioner Joshua Wright is right that it would be desirable for the Commission to issue Section 5 antitrust guidelines. This article will demonstrate, however, that the best way to formulate Section 5 guidelines is to focus them on the goal of protecting consumer choice, rather than to embrace Commissioner Wright's proposal to neuter the FTC Act by confining it in an economic efficiency straitjacket. Only if Section 5 guidelines were formulated appropriately would they improve consumer welfare during the Commission's second century.
The Proposed Damages Directive: The Real Lessons From The United States, Robert H. Lande
The Proposed Damages Directive: The Real Lessons From The United States, Robert H. Lande
All Faculty Scholarship
Europeans should be doubly cautious when they study the U.S. experience with private antitrust enforcement. Nevertheless, there are ten specific lessons they can learn. None, however, is consistent with the conventional wisdom in the international competition community that U.S.-style private enforcement has been a disaster. Each should help Europe objectively consider the Commission's proposed Directive concerning private enforcement of Competition law.