Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Administrative law (2)
- Fordham Law Review (2)
- Administrative Law Review (1)
- Administrative Litigation Law (ALL) (1)
- Administrative and Regulatory Law News (1)
-
- Administrative litigation (1)
- Affordable Care Act (1)
- Agency authority (1)
- Agency interpretation (1)
- Agency jurisdiction (1)
- American National Standards Institute (ANSI) (1)
- American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) (1)
- Big waiver (1)
- Checks and balances (1)
- Chevron (1)
- Chinese Communist Party (CCP) (1)
- City of Arlington (1)
- Civil liberties law (1)
- Clean Air Act (1)
- Columbia Law Review (1)
- Common law court (1)
- Conscientious objection (1)
- Constitutional dispute (1)
- Constitutional law (1)
- Direct democracy (1)
- Federal register (1)
- Federalism (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Harvard Law Review (1)
- Judicial review (1)
Articles 1 - 8 of 8
Full-Text Articles in Law
China: The Quest For Procedural Justice, Stanley B. Lubman
China: The Quest For Procedural Justice, Stanley B. Lubman
Hong Yen Chang Center for Chinese Legal Studies
This essay is contributed in recognition of Don Wallace’s dedication to furthering procedural justice in the U.S. and abroad. Don’s interests are wider than anyone else’s I can think of. Even though China and Chinese law are not represented in his published scholarship, in the course of our long friendship he has expressed thoughtful interest in many ways, including his constructive participation in the first delegation of the American Bar Association to visit China, which I escorted in 1978, and his later visits to China. Under Don’s leadership as Director of the International Law Institute at the Georgetown Law School, …
Step Zero After City Of Arlington, Thomas W. Merrill
Step Zero After City Of Arlington, Thomas W. Merrill
Faculty Scholarship
The thirty-year history of Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. is a story of triumph in the courts and frustration on the part of administrative law scholars. Chevron's appeal for the courts rests in significant part on its ease of application as a decisional device. Questions about the validity of an agency's interpretation of a statute are reduced to two inquiries: whether the statute itself provides a clear answer and, if not, whether the agency's answer is a reasonable one. The framework can be applied to virtually any statutory interpretation question resolved by an agency, and …
In Search Of Skidmore, Peter L. Strauss
In Search Of Skidmore, Peter L. Strauss
Faculty Scholarship
Ever since 1827, the U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly observed that when a court is interpreting a statute that falls within the authority of an administrative agency, the court in reaching its own judgment about the statute's meaning should give substantial weight to the agency's view. Repeated again and again over the years in varying formulations, this proposition found its apotheosis in Skidmore v. Swift & Co., a unanimous opinion authored by Justice Jackson in 1944. His opinion took the proposition to be so obvious that no citation was required. Justice Jackson's typically incisive and memorable formulation stuck. It …
From Sovereignty And Process To Administration And Politics: The Afterlife Of American Federalism, Jessica Bulman-Pozen
From Sovereignty And Process To Administration And Politics: The Afterlife Of American Federalism, Jessica Bulman-Pozen
Faculty Scholarship
Announcing the death of dual federalism, Edward Corwin asked whether the states could be “saved as the vital cells that they have been heretofore of democratic sentiment, impulse, and action.” The federalism literature has largely answered in the affirmative. Unwilling to abandon dual federalism’s commitment to state autonomy and distinctive interests, scholars have proposed new channels for protecting these forms of state-federal separation. Yet today state and federal governance are more integrated than separate. States act as co-administrators and co-legislatures in federal statutory schemes; they carry out federal law alongside the executive branch and draft the law together with Congress. …
Incorporating By Reference: Knowing Law In The Electronic Age, Peter L. Strauss
Incorporating By Reference: Knowing Law In The Electronic Age, Peter L. Strauss
Faculty Scholarship
Last October, the Office of the Federal Register published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (78 Fed. Reg. 60,784 (Oct. 2, 2013)) to revise its regulations governing the practice of "incorporation by Reference," which permits federal agencies to create binding regulatory obligations just by referring to standards that have been developed by private nongovernmental organizations, standards development organizations (SDOs) such as the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) or the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME). This rulemaking should be of substantial interest to the occupational safety community. While its comment period has closed, comments remain open until May 12, 2014, on …
The Supreme Court As A Constitutional Court, Jamal Greene
The Supreme Court As A Constitutional Court, Jamal Greene
Faculty Scholarship
Political institutions are always works in progress. Their practical duties and aims as instruments of governance may not always match their constitutional blueprints or historical roles. Political offices might not always have the power to do what their constituent officers either need or want to do. A polity's assessment of whether the desired power is a need or a want may indeed mark a boundary between law and politics in the domain of institutional structure. The law gives, or is interpreted to give, political organs the tools they need to function effectively. They must fight for the rest.
The Story Of Chevron: The Making Of An Accidental Landmark, Thomas W. Merrill
The Story Of Chevron: The Making Of An Accidental Landmark, Thomas W. Merrill
Faculty Scholarship
Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. NRDC is one of the most famous cases in administrative law, but it was not regarded that way when it was decided. To the justices who heard the case, Chevron was a controversy about the validity of the "bubble" concept under the Clean Air Act, not about the standard of review of agency interpretations of statutes. Drawing on Justice Blackmun's papers, Professor Merrill shows that the Court was initially closely divided, but Justice Stevens' opinion won them over, with no one paying much attention to his innovations in the formulation of the standard of review or …
The Administrative Origins Of Modern Civil Liberties Law, Jeremy K. Kessler
The Administrative Origins Of Modern Civil Liberties Law, Jeremy K. Kessler
Faculty Scholarship
This Article offers a new explanation for the puzzling origin of modern civil liberties law. Legal scholars have long sought to explain how Progressive lawyers and intellectuals skeptical of individual rights and committed to a strong, activist state came to advocate for robust First Amendment protections after World War I. Most attempts to solve this puzzle focus on the executive branch's suppression of dissent during World War I and the Red Scare. Once Progressives realized that a powerful administrative state risked stifling debate and deliberation within civil society, the story goes, they turned to civil liberties law in order to …