Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Publication
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Law
Brief Of Law Professors As Amici Curiae In Support Of Respondents, Summers V. Earth Island Inst., No. 07-463 (U.S. June 27, 2008), Richard J. Lazarus, Amanda C. Leiter, David C. Vladeck
Brief Of Law Professors As Amici Curiae In Support Of Respondents, Summers V. Earth Island Inst., No. 07-463 (U.S. June 27, 2008), Richard J. Lazarus, Amanda C. Leiter, David C. Vladeck
U.S. Supreme Court Briefs
No abstract provided.
Darden V. Peters: Giving Deference Where Deference May Not Be Due, Raisa L. Michalek
Darden V. Peters: Giving Deference Where Deference May Not Be Due, Raisa L. Michalek
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
Major D'Oh: Oira's Influence Over The Epa's Regulatory Decision Making In Riverkeeper, Inc. V. Epa, Ryan J. Rasmussen
Major D'Oh: Oira's Influence Over The Epa's Regulatory Decision Making In Riverkeeper, Inc. V. Epa, Ryan J. Rasmussen
Villanova Environmental Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Much Ado About Nothing?, Cary Coglianese
Much Ado About Nothing?, Cary Coglianese
All Faculty Scholarship
Policy scholars and decision makers should be careful before concluding that President Bush's recent Executive Order 13422 will result in "paralysis by analysis." That lament has been heard about other changes to rule making procedures over the last seven decades, yet steady increases in the cost and volume of federal regulations during that time period clearly indicate that paralysis has yet to set in. Administrative procedures are embedded within a complex web of politics, institutions, and organizational behavior. Within that web, procedures are but one factor influencing government agencies.
Children’S Rights To Representation: A Comparison Between Sweden And England, Titti Mattsson, Eva Ryrstedt
Children’S Rights To Representation: A Comparison Between Sweden And England, Titti Mattsson, Eva Ryrstedt
Titti Mattsson
In both England and in Sweden, the approach to a child's right to representation differs between public law cases and private law cases regarding legal custody/parental responsibility, residence or contact. This article discusses the basis for this distinction, and how far it accords with the best interests of the child.