Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- AHERA (1)
- Annual Survey of Virginia Law (1)
- Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (1)
- Blackwell v. Departmentof Motor Vehicles (1)
- Clean Air Act (1)
-
- Commonwealth v. Lotz Realty Co. (1)
- Cooper v. Occoquan Land Development Corp (1)
- DOT (1)
- Department of Transportation (1)
- EPA (1)
- Environmental Protection Agency (1)
- Ford Motor Co. v. Courtesy Motors (1)
- Heublein Inc. v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (1)
- Index (1)
- NESHAP (1)
- National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (1)
- OSHA (1)
- Occupational Safety and Health Act (1)
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration (1)
- RCRA (1)
- Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (1)
- SAPCB (1)
- SWCB (1)
- State Air Pollution Control Board (1)
- State Water Control Board (1)
- United States v. Geppert Brothers (1)
- VAPA (1)
- Virginia Administrative Process Act (1)
- Virginia Beach Beautification Commission v. Board of Zoning Appeals (1)
- Virginia Motor Vehicle Dealer Licensing Act (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Administrative Procedure, James E. Ryan Jr., Renata Manzo Scruggs
Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Administrative Procedure, James E. Ryan Jr., Renata Manzo Scruggs
University of Richmond Law Review
In 1989, the Virginia General Assembly made several relatively minor, but significant, changes to the Virginia Administrative Process Act (VAPA). These amendments modified the manner in which agencies may promulgate regulations and conduct informal fact finding hearings. Two new exemptions to the VAPA were created: one for rules for the conduct of specific lottery games; and a second for orders condemning shellfish growing areas. In other changes, rulemaking proceedings conducted by the State Water Control Board (SWCB), certain decisions of the Board of Social Services, and amendments to standards for asbestos inspections became subject to different provisions of the VAPA.
University Of Richmond Law Review
University Of Richmond Law Review
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
What's Current In Asbestos Regulations, Janis L. Kirkland
What's Current In Asbestos Regulations, Janis L. Kirkland
University of Richmond Law Review
Asbestos, once valued as a superb insulator, is now recognized as a deadly carcinogen. The United States Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") estimates that 733,000 public and commercial buildings in the United States contain friable asbestos or asbestos-containing materials. Thus, it is not surprising that an avalanche of litigation has resulted from concerns over exposure to asbestos.