Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- APA (1)
- API (1)
- Action for Children's Television v. Federal Communications Commission (1)
- Administrative Procedure Act (1)
- American Petroleum Institute v. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (1)
-
- Aqua Slide 'N' Dive Corp. v. Consumer Product Safety Commission (1)
- Courtaulds (Alabama) Inc. v. Dixon (1)
- FTC (1)
- Federal Trade Commission (1)
- Home Box Office Inc. v. Federal Communication Commission (1)
- IndustrialUnion Dep't AFL-CIO v. Hodgson (1)
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration. OSHA (1)
- Sangamon Valley Television Corp. v. United States (1)
- Sunshine Act (1)
- Synthetic Organic Chemicals Mfrs. Ass'n v. Brennan (1)
- United Air Lines Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board (1)
- Van Curler Broadcasting Corp. v. United States (1)
- Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
Scrutiny Of Osha Regulations In The Courts: A Study Of Judicial Activism, Elizabeth C. Gay
Scrutiny Of Osha Regulations In The Courts: A Study Of Judicial Activism, Elizabeth C. Gay
University of Richmond Law Review
Little trace of the concept of judicial deference can be found in the Fifth Circuit's recent ruling in American Petroleum Institute v. Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Against the background of a slowly emerging body of law regarding the scope of judicial review of Occupational Safety and Health Administration regulations, the Fifth Circuit's decision represents a bold extension of the court's authority to define the parameters of OSHA's regulatory authority. Whether this case in fact signals a new wave of judicial activism will soon be determined by the United States Supreme Court. But regardless of the Supreme Court's ultimate resolution …
Ex Parte Communication In Informal Rulemaking: Judicial Intervention In Administrative Procedures, Michael E. Ornoff
Ex Parte Communication In Informal Rulemaking: Judicial Intervention In Administrative Procedures, Michael E. Ornoff
University of Richmond Law Review
Over the past several years, a controversy has arisen, particularly among different panels of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, regarding the use of ex parte communications in informal administrative rulemaking. Numerous theories for extending such a prohibition beyond the express language of the Administrative Procedures Act have been advanced in recent judicial opinions.