Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Parties To Administrative Proceedings, Paul Oberst
Parties To Administrative Proceedings, Paul Oberst
Michigan Law Review
It is the purpose of this article to examine the statutory provisions, and the regulations and practices of the federal agencies, dealing with the rights of third persons, along with the relevant judicial decisions. The rights of third persons to notice, to participation in the hearing, and to appeal will be considered in turn. In general, the ultimate purposes of an administrative hearing are to inform the agency, to serve as a check upon arbitrary action, and to enable the individuals who will be affected by the decision to confront their opponents and to present their case in its best …
Subjective Judicial Review Of The Federal Communications Commission, Harry P. Warner
Subjective Judicial Review Of The Federal Communications Commission, Harry P. Warner
Michigan Law Review
The basis for judicial review of administrative agencies in one form or another is the Union Pacific rule, originally developed to govern the relationship between the courts and the Interstate Commerce Commission. Variations in the application of this judicial formula to different agencies have been shaped for the most part by the character of the governmental power exercised and the nature of the subject matter under review. For example, the judicial control exercised over taxing authorities is circumscribed by the sovereign demand for revenue essential to the maintenance of government. The scope of judicial review has been extended in deportation …
Public Utilities -Statutory Review By The State Supreme Court Of A Decision By The Commission
Public Utilities -Statutory Review By The State Supreme Court Of A Decision By The Commission
Michigan Law Review
Fifteen states in enacting public utility laws creating public utility commissions, have provided for an appeal on review of commission decisions, by the supreme court of the state. Other states provide for review by lower state courts with a subsequent appeal therefrom to the supreme court. No doubt, the direct appeal goes hand in hand with the more expeditious legal procedure exemplified by the creation of such administrative tribunals. In most states, including eight of the above fifteen, the constitutions provide that the jurisdiction of the supreme courts shall be appellate only, except for a few prerogative writs of original …