Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Administrative agencies (2)
- Adminstrative law (2)
- Democratic political representation (2)
- Representative democracy (2)
- Transmission belt model of representation (2)
-
- Trustee model of representation (2)
- A.D.A. (1)
- Acheson Hotels LLC v. Laufer (1)
- Administrative legitimacy (1)
- Agency legitimacy (1)
- Americans with Disabilities Act (1)
- Article III (1)
- Circuit split (1)
- Civil rights testers (1)
- Descriptive representation (1)
- Inc. v. Robins (1)
- Injury in fact (1)
- Popular sovereignty (1)
- Regulation (1)
- Spokeo (1)
- Standing (1)
- TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Did The Supreme Court In Transunion V. Ramirez Transform The Article Iii Standing Injury In Fact Test?: The Circuit Split Over Ada Tester Standing And Broader Theoretical Considerations, Bradford Mank
Faculty Articles and Other Publications
Some commentators have criticized the Supreme Court’s 2016 decision in Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins and especially the Court’s 2021 decision in TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez for limiting Congress’ authority to confer standing by statute. For example, in his article, Injury in Fact Transformed, Professor Cass Sunstein argues that TransUnion is a “radical ruling” that uses the injury in fact standing requirement to limit the authority of Congress to enact only statutes that address harms that have a close relationship to traditional or common law harms. By contrast, Professor Ernst Young argues that the Supreme Court’s injury in fact doctrine is …
Administration As Democratic Trustee Representation, Katharine Jackson
Administration As Democratic Trustee Representation, Katharine Jackson
Faculty Articles and Other Publications
The “folk” theory of democracy that typically justifies the administrative state cannot help but lead to a discourse of constraint. If agency action is only legitimate when it mechanically applies the will of the voters as transposed by Congress through statutes, then the norms guiding that action will inevitably restrain agency discretion. As a result, attempts to establish the democratic credentials of the administrative state ironically obstruct the application of collective power. But this “folk” theory of democracy is bad theory. It is empirically incredible and, alarmingly, facilitates dangerous populist politics. Political theory instead suggests that a theory of democratic …
The Public Trust: Administrative Legitimacy And Democratic Lawmaking, Katharine Jackson
The Public Trust: Administrative Legitimacy And Democratic Lawmaking, Katharine Jackson
Faculty Articles and Other Publications
This Article argues that recent United States Supreme Court decisions invalidating agency policymaking rely on a normatively unattractive and empirically mistaken notion of democratic popular sovereignty. Namely, they rely upon a transmission belt model that runs like this: democracy is vindicated by first translating and aggregating voter preferences through elections. Then, the popular will is transposed by members of Congress into the statute books. Finally, the popular will (now codified), is applied mechanically by administrative agencies who should merely “fill in the details” using their neutral, technical expertise. So long as statutes lay down sufficiently “intelligible principle[s]” that permit their …