Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 19 of 19

Full-Text Articles in Law

Appeal No. 0751: Century Well Services V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Dec 2005

Appeal No. 0751: Century Well Services V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order2005-41


Appeal No. 0752: Randy D. Brown V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Dec 2005

Appeal No. 0752: Randy D. Brown V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 2005-47


Appeal No. 0746: Georgiana Oil Company V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Sep 2005

Appeal No. 0746: Georgiana Oil Company V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Orders 2005-07, 2005-08, 2005-09, and 2005-10


Appeal No. 0747: Georgiana Oil Company V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Sep 2005

Appeal No. 0747: Georgiana Oil Company V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Orders 2005-07, 2005-08, 2005-09, and 2005-10


Appeal No. 0748: Georgiana Oil Company V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Sep 2005

Appeal No. 0748: Georgiana Oil Company V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Orders 2005-07, 2005-08, 2005-09, and 2005-10


Appeal No. 0743: Eastland Energy Group V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Sep 2005

Appeal No. 0743: Eastland Energy Group V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Orders 2004-104 and 2004-104 (corrected)


Appeal No. 0745: Georgiana Oil Company V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Sep 2005

Appeal No. 0745: Georgiana Oil Company V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Orders 2005-07, 2005-08, 2005-09, and 2005-10


Appeal No. 0749: Eastland Energy Group V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Sep 2005

Appeal No. 0749: Eastland Energy Group V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Orders 2004-104 and 2004-104 (corrected)


Appeal No. 0744: Paul A. Grim V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission May 2005

Appeal No. 0744: Paul A. Grim V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 2004-100


Appeal No. 0732: Waterloo Coal Company V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Apr 2005

Appeal No. 0732: Waterloo Coal Company V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 2004-32


Appeal No. 0734: Chieftain Energy Corp. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Apr 2005

Appeal No. 0734: Chieftain Energy Corp. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 2004-29


Appeal No. 0740: Francis Smith, Dba Ridgeway Resources V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Apr 2005

Appeal No. 0740: Francis Smith, Dba Ridgeway Resources V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 2004-27 and Chief's Order 2004-55


Appeal No. 0737: Gemini Energy, Inc. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Apr 2005

Appeal No. 0737: Gemini Energy, Inc. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 2004-38


Appeal No. 0739: Francis Smith, Dba Ridgeway Resources V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Apr 2005

Appeal No. 0739: Francis Smith, Dba Ridgeway Resources V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 2004-27 and Chief's Order 2004-55


Appeal No. 0717: Stonebridge Operating Co., Halwell Company, Inc. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Apr 2005

Appeal No. 0717: Stonebridge Operating Co., Halwell Company, Inc. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 2003-37


Appeal No. 0735: Chieftain Energy Corp. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Apr 2005

Appeal No. 0735: Chieftain Energy Corp. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 2004-37


Appeal No. 0736: Energy Development Corp. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Apr 2005

Appeal No. 0736: Energy Development Corp. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 2004-42


Appeal No. 0741: Chieftain Energy Corp. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Apr 2005

Appeal No. 0741: Chieftain Energy Corp. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 2004-49


Prometheus Radio Project V. Fcc: The Persistence Of Scarcity, Aaron K. Perzanowski Jan 2005

Prometheus Radio Project V. Fcc: The Persistence Of Scarcity, Aaron K. Perzanowski

Faculty Publications

Part I traces the history of broadcast regulation, emphasizing the development of the scarcity doctrine and the subsequent deregulatory trend. Part II examines the FCC's 2003 rule changes and the Third Circuit's analysis of those modifications in Prometheus Radio Project v. FCC. Part III analyzes the assumptions underlying the FCC's proffered explanation for its rule changes, ultimately concluding that they lack justification, and offers suggestions for responsible ownership deregulation. Part IV calls on Congress to reassert itself as the final arbiter of media policy.