Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
Articles 1 - 8 of 8
Full-Text Articles in Law
Section 337 And The Gatt: A Necessary Protection Or An Unfair Trade Practice?, Nathan G. Knight Jr.
Section 337 And The Gatt: A Necessary Protection Or An Unfair Trade Practice?, Nathan G. Knight Jr.
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
The National Environmental Policy Act Of 1969 And Its Implications For Nafta: Public Citizen V. United States Trade Representative, 822 F. Supp. 21 (D.D.C.), Rev'd 5 F.3d 549 (D.C. Cir. 1993)., Kristin R. Loecke
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
The Hearing Examiners And The Administrative Procedure Act, 1937-1960, Joanna L. Grisinger
The Hearing Examiners And The Administrative Procedure Act, 1937-1960, Joanna L. Grisinger
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Simplifying The Standard Of Review In North Carolina Administrative Appeals, Sarah H. Ludington
Simplifying The Standard Of Review In North Carolina Administrative Appeals, Sarah H. Ludington
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
The Department Of Agriculture's Rules Of Practice: Do They Still Serve Both The Department's And The Public's Needs?, Peter M. Davenport
The Department Of Agriculture's Rules Of Practice: Do They Still Serve Both The Department's And The Public's Needs?, Peter M. Davenport
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Final Decision Authority And The Central Panel Alj, Larry J. Craddock
Final Decision Authority And The Central Panel Alj, Larry J. Craddock
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Should Chevron Have Two Steps?, Richard M. Re
Should Chevron Have Two Steps?, Richard M. Re
Indiana Law Journal
Prominent judges and scholars have criticized the familiar Chevron deference scheme on the ground that its two steps are redundant. But each step of traditional two-step Chevron actually does unique interpretive work. In short, step one asks whether agency interpretations are mandatory, whereas step two asks whether they are reasonable. Other judges and scholars defend two-step Chevron on the ground that the second step should be equated with arbitrary-and-capricious review. But that approach makes Chevron partially redundant with the Administrative Procedure Act and compresses the distinct mandatoriness and reasonableness questions into an artificially singular first step. This Article identifies a …
The Hang-Up With Hamburg: How Center For Food Safety V. Hamburg Will Alter The Food Industry, Joella Roland
The Hang-Up With Hamburg: How Center For Food Safety V. Hamburg Will Alter The Food Industry, Joella Roland
Journal of Business & Technology Law
No abstract provided.