Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
Summary Of Canyon Villas V. State, Tax Comm’N, 124 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 7, Casey G. Perkins
Summary Of Canyon Villas V. State, Tax Comm’N, 124 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 7, Casey G. Perkins
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
Appeal from a district court order denying judicial review of property tax valuation.
Summary Of Dutchess Business Services, Inc.; And Legend Pharmaceuticals, Inc. V. Nevada State Board, 124 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 63, Elham Roohani
Summary Of Dutchess Business Services, Inc.; And Legend Pharmaceuticals, Inc. V. Nevada State Board, 124 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 63, Elham Roohani
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
Appeal from a district Court order denying review of a Nevada State Board of Pharmacy Decision to revoke wholesaler licenses and impose fines.
Summary Of Duchess Bus. Servs., Inc. V. Nev. St. Bd. Of Pharmacy, 124 Nev. Adv. Op. 32, Danielle Tarmu
Summary Of Duchess Bus. Servs., Inc. V. Nev. St. Bd. Of Pharmacy, 124 Nev. Adv. Op. 32, Danielle Tarmu
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
Two pharmaceutical wholesalers appeal from the district court’s denial of a petition for judicial review of an order by respondent Nevada State Board of Pharmacy (the Board) revoking the wholesalers’ licenses for violations of Nevada’s statutes and regulations governing the secondary prescription drug market. The wholesalers appeal on multiple grounds, three of which raise issues of first impression: (1) an administrative agency’s discretion concerning joinder in an administrative proceeding; (2) an administrative agency’s discretion with respect to discovery in an administrative proceeding; and (3) whether intent must be proven to render an entity liable for violating NRS § 585.520(1).2
Summary Of Father & Sons & A Daughter Too Vs. Transp. Servs. Auth. Of Nev., 124 Nev. Adv. Op. 24, Danielle Tarmu
Summary Of Father & Sons & A Daughter Too Vs. Transp. Servs. Auth. Of Nev., 124 Nev. Adv. Op. 24, Danielle Tarmu
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
Consolidated appeal from a district court order denying Father & Sons & a Daughter Too’s (FSD2) petition for judicial review regarding citations for two violations of NRS 706.386. The Court holds that FSD2 had held itself out to be a common motor carrier and substantial evidence supported the determination that it had violated NRS 706.386.