Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Administrative law (1)
- Administrative procedure act (1)
- American national standards institution (1)
- Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (1)
- Digital Signature Guidelines (1)
-
- Dooley v. Davidson (1)
- Driver's Privacy Protection Act (1)
- E-Sign Act (1)
- Electronic Communications Privacy Act (1)
- Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act (1)
- Electronic signature (1)
- FOIA (1)
- Fair Credit Reporting Act of 1970 (1)
- Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974 (1)
- Federal trade commission (1)
- Federal trade commission act (1)
- Florida Open Records Law (1)
- Freedom of Information Act (1)
- Georgia Digital Signature Task Force (1)
- Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (1)
- Inc. (1)
- Inc. v. Rambus (1)
- Joint electron device engineering council (1)
- Micron Technology (1)
- Nixon v. Administrator of General Services (1)
- Official notice (1)
- Ohio Open Records Law (1)
- Patenability (1)
- Patent (1)
- Patent trademark office (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Georgia Open Records Law Electronic Signature Exception: The Intersection Of Privacy, Technology, And Open Records, Michael L. Van Cise
The Georgia Open Records Law Electronic Signature Exception: The Intersection Of Privacy, Technology, And Open Records, Michael L. Van Cise
Journal of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
There Is A Better Way: It's Time To Overhaul The Model For Participation In Private Standard-Setting, Robert M. Webb
There Is A Better Way: It's Time To Overhaul The Model For Participation In Private Standard-Setting, Robert M. Webb
Journal of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
Shifting The Burden Of Proving Patentability Vel Non In View Of Dickinson V. Zurko, Dawn-Marie Bey
Shifting The Burden Of Proving Patentability Vel Non In View Of Dickinson V. Zurko, Dawn-Marie Bey
Journal of Intellectual Property Law
This paper addresses the Patent Office's misinterpretation of the Supreme Court's ruling in Dickinson v. Zurko regarding the applicability of the factual review standards of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) to Patent Office findings. More particularly, in accordance with this misinterpretation, recent guidelines promulgated by the Patent Office violate the APA and controlling precedent.
To date, the proper procedures for prosecuting a patent application have been carefully honed through a myriad of statutes, rules, and controlling legal opinions. The resulting procedures are set forth in exemplary prose in the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP) issued and revised periodically by …