Law Commons^™

67/12/12 Oral Arguments Before The Us Supreme Court, Louis Stokes, Reuben M. Payne, Earl Warren, Hugo L. Black, William O. Douglas, John M. Harlan, William J. Brennan Jr., Potter Stewart, Byron R. White, Abe Fortas, Thurgood Marshall

United States Supreme Court

Tuesday, December 12, 1967 oral arguments before the United States Supreme Court.

67/12/12 Supreme Court Hears Stop-Frisk Case, Cleveland Press

Newspaper Coverage

Reports on Louis Stokes argument that upholding Terry's frisking by Detective Martin McFadden would signal the relaxing of the Fourth Amendment's protection against illegal search and seizure. Reuben Payne, assistant Cuyahoga County prosecutor, contended that the McFadden had the right to search Terry whom he suspected was planning a robbery and probably was armed.

67/12/11 High Court To Eye Frisk Case, Cleveland Plain Dealer

Newspaper Coverage

Reports how the Court is hearing Terry v. Ohio along with 3 others cases with stop-and-frisk issues. The Court will explore:

How much right does a policeman have to stop and question a suspicious person he has no legal reason to arrest?

If a policeman frisks a person he does not have a reason to arrest and finds incriminating evidence, can that evidence be used against the person in court.

Virginia Bar Exam, December 1967, Day 1

Virginia Bar Exam Archive

No abstract provided.

Key Federal Tax Cases Decided By The Courts In 1967, Lester R. Uretz

William & Mary Annual Tax Conference

No abstract provided.

Section 482 And Its Effects On International Business Transactions, S. M. Frohlich

William & Mary Annual Tax Conference

No abstract provided.

Trends In The Taxation Of Foreign Income, M. Bernard Aidinoff

William & Mary Annual Tax Conference

No abstract provided.

The Case For Greater Uniformity Of Federal And State Law With Respect To Individual Income Taxpayers, Frank W. Rogers Jr.

William & Mary Annual Tax Conference

No abstract provided.

State Income Tax Conformity: Knotty Problems In The Branches Of The Federal Tree, Edwin S. Cohen

William & Mary Annual Tax Conference

No abstract provided.

Advantages And Disadvantages To Virginia Businesses In The Reconciliation Of Certain Major Accounting Areas As Between Federal And State Tax Laws, R. Braxton Hill Jr.

William & Mary Annual Tax Conference

No abstract provided.

Coordination Of Federal And State Tax Laws: Effect On Virginia Corporations And Their Shareholders, W. Gibson Harris

William & Mary Annual Tax Conference

No abstract provided.

The Tax Benefit, Recoveries, And Sales Of Property Under Section 337, Don L. Ricketts

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.

Woolsack 1967 Volume 5 Number 3, University Of San Diego School Of Law Student Bar Association

Newspaper, The Woolsack (1963-1987)

Table of Contents:

In The Mississippi Mud: The Closed Society by Michael Pirosh

Bar Results Announced

State Bar Committee Approves Student Internship Program

Defenders Go to Court

Schlafley Scores Defense Policies

Judge Carter Explains Omnibus Proposal

Editorial

Moot Court Team Places Second in Regionals

Alumni Elects Officers

S.B.A. Submits Honor Code

Behind the Rostra: Phillip Martin: Attorney, Professor, Author by Mitch Frankel

Ivan Strikes Back: Decision Comes Down, and Down, and down by W. Kent Levis

A.B.A. News Briefs

Labor Law: Requiring Employer To Bargain With Old Union At New Location In “Runaway Shop” Situation Is Beyond Nlrb’S Authority

Duke Law Journal

The Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia has held that the NLRB cannot force an employer who has relocated his plant in order to escape a union to bargain with that union at the new location where the union had not secured a majority position. This note examines the possible remedies that may be available to the Board against such "runaway shops" and evaluates each of them in light of the language and purposes of the National Labor Relations Act.

Labor Relations--Court Enforcement Of Union Fines, Thomas M. Chattin Jr.

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Portland Case, Ray D. Henson

Georgia Law Review

Commentary

Colonial Lawyer Vol. 1, No. 3 (December, 1967), Editors Of Colonial Lawyer

Colonial Lawyer

No abstract provided.

Defense Department Case File, Bern Porter

Security Files

Reports documenting Bern Porter's mental health while he was employed at Boeing in 1967.

Interest-Free Loans And Section 482 - Creation Of Income?, Paul E. Holtzmuller

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.

Recent Decisions, N/A N/A

Georgia Law Review

Recent Decisions

The Development Of Legal Systems: The Ethiopian Experience, Robert Allen Sedler

Law Faculty Research Publications

A complete, modern legal system must be created in each of the "developing nations" of the world to meet the needs of rapid social and economic growth. The problems experienced in imposing a new legal system upon a "developing" society are frequently similar among the various nations. Professor Sedier discusses these problems of general legal development with respect to several new nations. His detailed analysis of the progress of the Ethiopian legal system brings into focus the common denominators of legal and societal evolution. He is particularly qualified to discuss the Ethiopian experience because of his former position as Assistant …

The President's Page, James H. Coleman Jr.

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

Special Appearances Under The Rules Of Civil Procedure, Ray L. Hampton Ii

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

Constitutional Law--Due Process In Juvenile Court Proceeding, John Hampton Tinney

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

Wills--Ademption Of Specific Legacies, James Alan Harris

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

Criminal Law--Definition Of Capital Offenses, Peter Thomas Denny, Martin Joseph Glasser, John Charles Lobert

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

Procedure--Unincorporated Associations, Peter Thomas Denny, Martin Joseph Glasser, John Charles Lobert

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

Antitrust's Newest Quagmire: The Noerr-Pennington Defense, L. Barry Costilo

Michigan Law Review

In recent years two relatively unheralded but sweeping antitrust decisions by the Supreme Court have given rise to ramifications far beyond their facts. Unless limited, they may be interpreted by business planners as providing safe havens in many areas of conduct where corporations and trade associations have previously feared to tread. The cases are Eastern Railroad Presidents Corp. v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc. and United Mine Workers of America v. Pennington. The broad issue they raise is the extent to which business can concertedly seek to use the mechanism of government for the purpose of restraining trade without violating …

The General Agreement On Tariffs And Trade In United States Domestic Law, John H. Jackson

Michigan Law Review

This article will undertake a two-step analysis. First, in Part II, the question whether GATT is legally a part of United States domestic law will be examined. Then, assuming GATT is part of this law, Part III will examine the extent of GATT's domestic law effect and its general relationship to other law, both federal and state. The chosen focus of this article thus excludes treatment of substantive obligations under specific GATT clauses. It also excludes intensive development of the myriad details of the scope of executive authority to negotiate particular trade concessions under legislation such as the Trade Expansion …

Jurisdiction--Foreign Patents--Jurisdiction Over Foreign Patent Claims, Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

The territorial limitations of sovereignty have been held to preclude a country from giving extraterritorial effect to its patent laws, and, therefore, a patent confers rights which are protected only within the boundaries of the issuing country. Thus, United States and foreign patents, even when granted for the same invention, create separate and distinct rights which may differ in scope and effect in the respective countries. Concomitantly, courts have also held that a foreign patent confers upon its owner no rights or protection with respect to acts done in the United States.