Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Constitutional Law-Due Process-Punishment For Direct Contempt Of Court, William R. Worth
Constitutional Law-Due Process-Punishment For Direct Contempt Of Court, William R. Worth
Michigan Law Review
Opposing counsel's objection to material in petitioner's opening statement to the jury was sustained. When petitioner rephrased his statement, the trial court, feeling that he was still trying to get inadmissible material before the jury, threatened to "declare a mistrial if you mess with me two minutes and a half, and fine you besides.'' Petitioner took an exception to the conduct of the court, and was immediately fined $25. His protests led to successive increases in penalty, culminating in a $100 fine and three days in jail. The Supreme Court of Texas denied habeas corpus on the ground that the …
Negligence-Proximate Cause-Plaintiff's Burden Of Proof Where Either Of Two Wrongful Acts Could Have Caused Injury, M. J. Spencer
Negligence-Proximate Cause-Plaintiff's Burden Of Proof Where Either Of Two Wrongful Acts Could Have Caused Injury, M. J. Spencer
Michigan Law Review
While walking on a highway, A was knocked down by a car driven by B, and was almost immediately run over by C's car. A was pronounced dead from several injuries, any one of which would have sufficed to cause his death. Plaintiff, A's administratrix, recovered judgment against both B and C for A's death. Held, reversing on other grounds, joinder of B and C was proper. Micelli v. Hirsch, (Ohio App. 1948) 83 N.E. (2d) 240.
Negligence--Proximate Cause--Effect Of Non-Registration Of Automobile, Richard B. Gushée
Negligence--Proximate Cause--Effect Of Non-Registration Of Automobile, Richard B. Gushée
Michigan Law Review
Defendant X owned a non-registered automobile which was parked on a public way by defendant Y, an agent of X. The keys were left in the car in violation of a statute. Later in the same day the car was stolen. Plaintiff, a pedestrian, was injured by the thief's negligent operation of the car. In an action to recover for the injury, a verdict was directed for defendants. On appeal, held, affirmed. As a matter of law, defendant's action in allowing a non-registered automobile containing its keys to remain on a public way was not the proximate …