Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (19)
- Criminal Law (14)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (11)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (8)
- Legal History (8)
-
- Administrative Law (7)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (7)
- Courts (7)
- Legal Education (7)
- Health Law and Policy (6)
- Human Rights Law (6)
- Law and Society (6)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (6)
- Environmental Law (5)
- Family Law (5)
- Intellectual Property Law (5)
- Social Welfare Law (5)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (4)
- Housing Law (4)
- Labor and Employment Law (4)
- Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration (4)
- Science and Technology Law (4)
- Torts (4)
- Immigration Law (3)
- International Law (3)
- Jurisprudence (3)
- Legislation (3)
- Litigation (3)
- Sexuality and the Law (3)
- Keyword
-
- Judicial review (6)
- Separation of powers (6)
- Civil rights (5)
- Intellectual property (5)
- Law – study and teaching (5)
-
- Antitrust law (4)
- Competition (4)
- Law – philosophy (4)
- Legal ethics (4)
- Public welfare (4)
- Constitutional law (3)
- Discrimination in housing (3)
- Federal government (3)
- Litigation (3)
- Poverty (3)
- Administrative agencies (2)
- Arab Americans (2)
- Bill (2)
- Bioethics (2)
- Cable television (2)
- Competition – United States (2)
- Consolidation and merger of corporations (2)
- Constitution – Interpretation and construction (2)
- Culture and law (2)
- Deportation (2)
- Detention of persons (2)
- Discrimination in criminal justice administration (2)
- Discrimination in employment (2)
- Dispute resolution (2)
- Environmental protection (2)
Articles 1 - 30 of 104
Full-Text Articles in Law
Brief For Amici Curiae Aarp Et Al., United States Department Of Housing And Urban Development V. Rucker Et Al., Nos. 00-1770 & 00-1781 (U.S. Dec. 20, 2001), Peter B. Edelman
Brief For Amici Curiae Aarp Et Al., United States Department Of Housing And Urban Development V. Rucker Et Al., Nos. 00-1770 & 00-1781 (U.S. Dec. 20, 2001), Peter B. Edelman
U.S. Supreme Court Briefs
No abstract provided.
Brief In Opposition, Nevada Department Of Human Resources V. Hibbs, No. 01-1368 (U.S. 2001), Cornelia T. Pillard
Brief In Opposition, Nevada Department Of Human Resources V. Hibbs, No. 01-1368 (U.S. 2001), Cornelia T. Pillard
U.S. Supreme Court Briefs
No abstract provided.
Department Of Justice Oversight: Preserving Our Freedoms While Defending Against Terrorism: Hearing Before The S. Comm. On The Judiciary, 107th Cong., Dec. 6, 2001 (Statement Of Neal Kumar Katyal, Prof. Of Law, Geo. U. L. Center), Neal K. Katyal
Testimony Before Congress
No abstract provided.
Direct Broadcast Satellite Service And Competition In The Multichannel Video Distribution Market: Hearing Before The H. Comm. On The Judiciary, 107th Cong., Dec. 4, 2001 (Statement Of Robert Pitofsky, Prof. Of Law, Geo. U. L. Center), Robert Pitofsky
Testimony Before Congress
No abstract provided.
Petition For A Writ Of Certiorari, Minority Media And Telecommunications Council V. Md/Dc/De Broadcasters Ass'n, No. 01-639 (U.S. Oct. 17, 2001), Angela J. Campbell, Amy S. Wolverton
Petition For A Writ Of Certiorari, Minority Media And Telecommunications Council V. Md/Dc/De Broadcasters Ass'n, No. 01-639 (U.S. Oct. 17, 2001), Angela J. Campbell, Amy S. Wolverton
U.S. Supreme Court Briefs
No abstract provided.
Protecting Constitutional Freedoms In The Face Of Terrorism: Hearing Before The S. Comm. On The Judiciary, 107th Cong., Oct. 3, 2001 (Statement Of David D. Cole, Prof. Of Law, Geo. U. L. Center), David Cole
Testimony Before Congress
No abstract provided.
Judicial Nomination And Confirmation Process: Hearing Before The S. Comm. On The Judiciary, 107th Cong., Sept. 4, 2001 (Statement Of Mark V. Tushnet, Prof. Of Law, Geo. U. L. Center), Mark V. Tushnet
Testimony Before Congress
No abstract provided.
Petition For A Writ Of Certiorari, Time Warner Entertainment Co. V. F.C.C., No. 01-223 (U.S. Aug. 08, 2001), Fernando Bohorquez, Jr., Angela J. Campbell
Petition For A Writ Of Certiorari, Time Warner Entertainment Co. V. F.C.C., No. 01-223 (U.S. Aug. 08, 2001), Fernando Bohorquez, Jr., Angela J. Campbell
U.S. Supreme Court Briefs
No abstract provided.
Listing And Delisting Processes Under The Endangered Species Act: Hearing Before The S. Subcomm. On Fisheries, Wildlife And Water, 107th Cong., May 9, 2001 (Statement Of John D. Echeverria, Dir. Environmental Policy Project, Geo. U. L. Center), John D. Echeverria
Testimony Before Congress
No abstract provided.
Free Trade Deals: Is The U.S. Losing Ground As Its Trading Partners Move Ahead: Hearing Before The H. Subcomm. On Trade Of The H. Comm. On Ways And Means, 107th Cong., Mar. 29, 2001 (Statement Of Daniel K. Tarullo, Prof. Of Law, Geo. U. L. Center), Daniel K. Tarullo
Testimony Before Congress
No abstract provided.
Brief Amici Curiae Of Legal Historians Listed Herein In Support Of Respondent, I.N.S. V. St. Cyr, No. 00-767 (U.S. Mar. 27, 2001), ., James Oldham
U.S. Supreme Court Briefs
No abstract provided.
Privacy In The Commercial World: Online Consumer Privacy Concerns: Hearing Before The H. Subcomm. On Commerce, Trade, And Consumer Protection Of The H. Comm. On Energy, 107th Cong., Mar. 1, 2001 (Statement Of Chai R. Feldblum, Prof. Of Law, Geo. U. L. Center), Chai R. Feldblum
Testimony Before Congress
No abstract provided.
Reply To Brief In Opposition, Chris V. Tenet, No. 00-829 (U.S. Feb. 12, 2001), David C. Vladeck
Reply To Brief In Opposition, Chris V. Tenet, No. 00-829 (U.S. Feb. 12, 2001), David C. Vladeck
U.S. Supreme Court Briefs
No abstract provided.
Brief For Respondents, Palazzolo V. Rhode Island Ex. Rel. Tavares, No. 99-2047 (U.S. Jan. 3, 2001), Richard J. Lazarus
Brief For Respondents, Palazzolo V. Rhode Island Ex. Rel. Tavares, No. 99-2047 (U.S. Jan. 3, 2001), Richard J. Lazarus
U.S. Supreme Court Briefs
No abstract provided.
Welfare, Children And Families: The Impact Of Welfare Reform In The New Economy, William Julius Wilson
Welfare, Children And Families: The Impact Of Welfare Reform In The New Economy, William Julius Wilson
Philip A. Hart Memorial Lecture
In 2001, University Professor, William Julius Wilson of Harvard University, delivered the Georgetown Law Center’s twenty-first Annual Philip A. Hart Memorial Lecture: "Welfare, Children and Families: The Impact of Welfare Reform in the New Economy."
William Julius Wilson is Lewis P. and Linda L. Geyser University Professor at Harvard University. He is one of only 20 University Professors, the highest professional distinction for a Harvard faculty member. After receiving the Ph.D. from Washington State University in 1966, Wilson taught sociology at the University of Massachusetts at Amherst, before joining the University of Chicago faculty in 1972. In 1990 he was …
Poverty & Welfare: Does Compassionate Conservatism Have A Heart?, Peter B. Edelman
Poverty & Welfare: Does Compassionate Conservatism Have A Heart?, Peter B. Edelman
Georgetown Law Faculty Lectures and Appearances
I am honored to deliver a lecture in memory of Edward Sobota, especially because such distinguished speakers have preceded me.
Our question here is: does compassionate conservatism have a heart? Almost five years have passed since the 1996 welfare law was enacted. So, we might ask, where are we and where are we going, and even more to the point, what are the prospects for better policy and outcomes on poverty generally? One American child in six is still poor, and the number of families in economic difficulty is much larger than that. That is the context in which we …
Wellington’S Labors, Michael H. Gottesman
Wellington’S Labors, Michael H. Gottesman
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
My first class as a student at Yale Law School was the first class Harry Wellington taught there. It was the Fall of 1956. The course was Contracts. Harry entered the classroom, looking no older than the students (in truth, he 'wasn't much older), but surely better dressed. He settled himself on the corner of the desk, and the magic began. Without introduction or fanfare, Harry embarked on a monologue about a magazine that kept arriving, uninvited, in his mailbox each month. He confessed to leafing through the pages from time to time, and wondered if this obligated him to …
Handling Cases Of Willful Exposure Through Hiv Partner Counseling And Referral Services, Lawrence O. Gostin, James G. Hodge Jr.
Handling Cases Of Willful Exposure Through Hiv Partner Counseling And Referral Services, Lawrence O. Gostin, James G. Hodge Jr.
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
Cases of willful exposure reveal the existing and future risks to the public health (especially women) which may be presented by individuals who willfully expose others to HIV through unsafe sexual or needle-sharing behaviors. In response to a documented case of willful exposure, a PCRS counselor or other public health official may, in his or her professional judgment, decide to act to avert a legitimate public health threat to known or unknown persons in the community. Yet handling such cases raises difficult issues in law, ethics, and public health practice. Public health authorities may be unable or ill-equipped to successfully …
A Man Lost In The Gray Zone, David Luban
A Man Lost In The Gray Zone, David Luban
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
The Rudolf Kastner trial was one of the three great scandals that rocked Israeli party politics in the 1950s (the others were the negotiations with Germany for Holocaust reparations and the so-called "Lavon affair"). Although Leora Bilsky describes it as an "almost forgotten trial," it has not been forgotten by subsequent writers: it makes an important cameo appearance in Arendt's Eichmann in Jerusalem; it features prominently in Tom Segev's The Seventh Million (1991); Yehuda Bauer's Jews for Sale? (1994) takes pains to refute the charges against Kastner; and it inspired two novels - Amos Elon's Timetable (1980) and Neil Gordon's …
Joseph In Lawyerland, Robin West
Joseph In Lawyerland, Robin West
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
As Alice wanders through Wonderland in an unreal space in real time-a dream-learning backward truths from illogical creatures who speak in paradoxes, so Joseph figuratively wanders through lawyerland in an unreal time, but in a very real space-Manhattan-conversing with his thinly fictionalized friends, all of whom happen to be lawyers, about their lives and practices in law. As Joseph's lawyers talk with him about the law they practice, they uncover, through White Rabbit and Cheshire Cat-like illogical precision, a chaotic, unkempt, unconscionably reckless, often cruel, and sometimes pathological legal wilderness. The legal terrain these lawyers occupy is not an inviting …
Reconstructing The Rule Of Law, Robin West
Reconstructing The Rule Of Law, Robin West
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
The action taken in Bush v. Gore by the five conservative Justices on the United States Supreme Court, Bugliosi argued, was not just wrong as a matter of law, but criminal: It was a malem in se, fully intended, premeditated theft of a national election for the Presidency of the United States. Now, as Balkan and Levinson would argue, this seventh, "prosecutorial" response -- that the Court's action was not just wrong but criminal -- is also not available to a devotee of either radical or moderate indeterminacy. Even assuming both criminal intent and severe harm-a wrongful, specific intent to …
Race And Discretion In American Medicine, Maxwell Gregg Bloche
Race And Discretion In American Medicine, Maxwell Gregg Bloche
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
The author’s focus in this article is on racial disparities in medical care provision--that is, on differences in the services that clinically similar patients receive when they present to the health care system. Racial disparities in health status, which is not greatly influenced (on a population-wide basis) by medical care, are beyond his scope here. Disparities in medical care access-potential patients' ability, financial and otherwise, to gain entry to the health care system in the first place, are also outside his focus. The author begins this article by putting the problem of racial disparities in medical care provision within the …
Privacy, Ideology, And Technology: A Response To Jeffrey Rosen, Julie E. Cohen
Privacy, Ideology, And Technology: A Response To Jeffrey Rosen, Julie E. Cohen
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
This essay reviews Jeffrey Rosen’s The Unwanted Gaze: The Destruction of Privacy in America (2000).
Rosen offers a compelling (and often hair-raising) account of the pervasive dissolution of the boundary between public and private information. This dissolution is both legal and social; neither the law nor any other social institution seems to recognize many limits on the sorts of information that can be subjected to public scrutiny. The book also provides a rich, evocative characterization of the dignitary harms caused by privacy invasion. Rosen’s description of the sheer unfairness of being “judged out of context” rings instantly true. Privacy, Rosen …
To Our Children's Children's Children: The Problems Of Intergenerational Ethics, Lawrence B. Solum
To Our Children's Children's Children: The Problems Of Intergenerational Ethics, Lawrence B. Solum
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
This essay serves as the introduction to the Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review's symposium on intergenerational justice. The importance of this topic cannot be overstated. Intergenerational ethics bears on questions of environmental policy, health policy, intellectual property law, international development policy, social security policy, telecommunications policy, and a variety of other issues.
Part II, Clarifying the Problems of Intergenerational Ethics, is a first sketch of the scope and nature of intergenerational justice, introducing a variety of cases and contexts in which issues of intergenerational ethics arise and distinguishing between the political and moral dimensions of these issues. Part …
Self-Defense And Subjectivity, Victoria Nourse
Self-Defense And Subjectivity, Victoria Nourse
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
The law of self-defense has rarely produced as much academic or popular heat as it has in the past two decades. Widely publicized trials, such as the Goetz and Menendez cases, have generated deep-seated fears of a law unmoored from principle. Those fears have generated a standard public critique--that the criminal law has become too soft and subjective, too wedded to syndrome science and prone to weak-kneed affection for defendants. The criminal law has lost its "objectivity," so the argument goes. The poster child, and even the alleged cause of this development, is the battered woman.
In this article, the …
Analysis Of Foreclosure In The Ec Guidelines On Vertical Restraints, Steven C. Salop
Analysis Of Foreclosure In The Ec Guidelines On Vertical Restraints, Steven C. Salop
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
The antitrust treatment of vertical restraints is quite controversial. In the United States, for example, warring vertical restraints guidelines were issued by the Department of Justice and National Association of Attorneys General, a group of antitrust enforcers from the individual states. However, a consensus was never achieved and these guidelines never entered the mainstream. Compare them to the U.S. Horizontal Merger Guidelines, which have become a template for evaluation of horizontal restraints.
The new EC Guidelines on Vertical Restraints Guidelines ("GVRs") represent a significant effort to create and implement a consistent analytic framework for evaluating vertical restraints. The scope of …
Constitution-Talk And Justice-Talk, Mark V. Tushnet
Constitution-Talk And Justice-Talk, Mark V. Tushnet
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
Inside the courts, one might distinguish between constitution-talk and justice-talk on the ground that the former, but not the latter, results in enforceable legal judgments. So, inside the courts, we might interpret the Constitution with justice in mind, but what we do is produce legally enforceable judgments. Outside the courts, however, it might seem that all we do is interpret and talk. It is not immediately obvious that cloaking justice-talk as constitution-talk outside the courts has much rhetorical force. As I will argue, the fact that invoking the Constitution outside the courts, in the course of discussing justice, does have …
Subconstitutional Constitutional Law: Supplement, Sham, Or Substitute?, Mark V. Tushnet
Subconstitutional Constitutional Law: Supplement, Sham, Or Substitute?, Mark V. Tushnet
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
In this brief Comment I make two points. First, the subconstitutional doctrines appear to have the advantage of allowing elected lawmakers to pursue whatever course they wish, as long as they satisfy the requirements of these subconstitutional doctrines. In practice, however, what appears to be a provisional invalidation based on subconstitutional law turns out to be - and, indeed, might be expected at the moment of decision to be - a final, unrevisable decision. Further, courts might strategically deploy these sub constitutional doctrines to avoid the sting of the charge that they are foreclosing legislative choice while effectively doing so. …
In The Shadow Of Daniel Webster: Arguing Appeals In The Twenty-First Century, Seth P. Waxman
In The Shadow Of Daniel Webster: Arguing Appeals In The Twenty-First Century, Seth P. Waxman
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
It is natural - I suppose it is expected - for every Solicitor General to hold forth at some point during his tenure with pearls of wisdom on the Twelve Secrets, or Ten Commandments, or Five Essential Rules of effective oral advocacy. I have always been reluctant to do that . . . reluctantly, after years of resistance, I too will unburden myself of a few principles. First, though, I would like to reach back in history for some inspiration by reflecting a bit on Daniel Webster.
Planet Asian America, Mari J. Matsuda
Planet Asian America, Mari J. Matsuda
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
In forming the Asian Law Caucus, the elders - some of whom are here in this room - chose resistance. They created a space in which Asian Americans were in charge, deciding what mattered to them and what strategies worked for them. If someone else were in charge, things would have gone differently. Risks were taken, and victories were won that would not have happened using traditional litigation strategies or leaving the work to traditional civil rights organizations. It was important to create an Asian American space to do this work: to fight Chinatown evictions, to pursue redress for the …