Law Commons^™

The Evolving Scope Of Ipr Estoppel As Applied To System And Product Prior Art, Michael Rueckheim, Richard Jung

Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property

No abstract provided.

Consider The Grecian Urn: Why Prior Art Has No Place In Analyzing Substantial Similarity Under The Copyright Act, Steven T. Lowe, Scott Alan Burroughs

Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property

No abstract provided.

The Ethics Of Patents In The Medical Field: An Analysis Of Drug And Pharmaceutical Patents And Their Enforcement In The U.S. And France, Andrew Slutsky

Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property

No abstract provided.

Ipr Estoppel And A Search For The Skilled Searcher Standard, Gabriel Steinberg

Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property

Interpretation of post-AIA IPR estoppel, codified in U.S.C. § 315(e)(2), is an issue at the forefront of patent litigation and plays an important role in the litigation process and strategy. The Federal Cir-cuit’s April 2023 ruling in Ironburg Inventions Ltd. v. Valve Corp., adopted the “skilled searcher standard” and provided some clarity re-garding the meaning of the § 315(e)(2) language, “reasonably could have raised.” While Ironburg did hold that prior art which “reasonably could have been raised” is that which “a skilled searcher conducting a diligent search reasonably would have been expected to discover,” questions pertaining to what exactly is …

Iconic Copiestm, Felicia Caponigri

Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property

There is a word that is prevalent today in marketing campaigns, ed-itorials, and our everyday language: iconic. “Iconic” is not only preva-lent as a word in everyday life. Iconic can also have legal significance. As I introduce in this article, the concept of iconic and its use by brands in trademark registrations, oppositions, and litigation has significant and underappreciated consequences under the law. There has yet been no study on the word “iconic” or the legal significance of iconic, de-spite the word’s creeping use in legal filings and claims. My article fills this gap by introducing the concept of iconic …

Review Of Patent Owner Estoppel Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.73(D), Daniel Sloan, Sarah Geers, Jack Graves, Sabrina Bellantoni, Matt Johnson

Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property

No abstract provided.

Whither The Wagner Act: On The Waning View Of Labor Law And Leviathan, Brandon R. Magner

Employee Rights and Employment Policy Journal

The National Labor Relations Act’s (NLRA) well-documented weaknesses in substance and enforcement, combined with legislators’ inability to adapt the Act to the modern economy, have understandably created many cynics in the field of labor law. For several decades, legal scholars have almost unanimously derided the NLRA and the agency which administers it, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), for failing to prevent rampant anti-union conduct by employers and the collapse of the union formation process through the Board’s election machinery. This “ossification” of the law, as it has come to be known, is considered to be a key contributor to …

Vol. 40, Jenny Lee

The Illinois Public Employee Relations Report

Students for Fair Admissions: A New Standard for Race-Conscious Affirmative Action

By Jenny Lee

Virtual Technology And The Changing Rituals Of Courtroom Justice, Meredith Rossner, David Tait

Chicago-Kent Law Review

No abstract provided.

How Can You Tell If There Is A Crisis? Data And Measurement Challenges In Assessing Jury Representation, Mary R. Rose, Marc A. Musick

Chicago-Kent Law Review

No abstract provided.

Beacons Of Democracy? A Worldwide Exploration Of The Relationship Between Democracy And Lay Participation In Criminal Cases, Sanja K. Ivkovic, Valarie P. Hans

Chicago-Kent Law Review

No abstract provided.

Copyright, Chicago-Kent Law Revew

Chicago-Kent Law Review

No abstract provided.

How Can You Tell If There Is A Crisis? Data And Measurement Challenges In Assessing Jury Representation, Mary R. Rose, Marc A. Musick

Chicago-Kent Law Review

No abstract provided.

Race, Peremptory Challenges, And State Courts: A Blueprint For Change, Nancy S. Marder

Chicago-Kent Law Review

No abstract provided.

Judges, Lawyers, And Willing Jurors: A Tale Of Two Jury Selections, Barbara O'Brien, Catherine M. Grosso

Chicago-Kent Law Review

No abstract provided.

Beacons Of Democracy? A Worldwide Exploration Of The Relationship Between Democracy And Lay Participation In Criminal Cases, Sanja K. Ivkovic, Valarie P. Hans

Chicago-Kent Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Arrival Of The Civil Jury In Argentina: The Case Of Chaco, Shari S. Diamond, Valarie P. Hans, Natali Chizik, Andres Harfuch

Chicago-Kent Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Hybridization Of Lay Courts: From Colombia To England And Wales, Jeremy Boulanger-Bonnelly

Chicago-Kent Law Review

No abstract provided.

Lay Participation Reform In China: Opportunities And Challenges, Zhiyuan Guo

Chicago-Kent Law Review

No abstract provided.

Virtual Technology And The Changing Rituals Of Courtroom Justice, Meredith Rossner, David Tait

Chicago-Kent Law Review

No abstract provided.

Trypanophobia: The Scary World Of Tattoos And The Law, Dalton Primeaux

Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property

No abstract provided.

The Death Of The Litmus Test, Dale Cendali, Abbey Quigley

Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property

No abstract provided.

Comments On Amgen V. Sanofi, Oskar Liivak

Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property

No abstract provided.

Balancing The Scales: Analyzing Motivation To Combine And Avoiding Impermissible Hindsight In 2023, Michael Pomeroy

Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property

No abstract provided.

Motions To Submit Supplemental Information: An Infrequently Utilized Procedure, Matthew Johnson, Ashvi Patel

Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property

No abstract provided.

Reading Trademark Tea-Leaves At The Supreme Court, Graeme B. Dinwoodie

Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property

No abstract provided.

Written Statement: Andy Warhol Foundation For The Visual Arts, Inc. V. Goldsmith, Yolanda M. King

Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property

No abstract provided.

Jack Daniel’S Properties V. Vip Products And The Current State Of Trademark Fair Use, Christine Haight Farley

Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property

No abstract provided.

Some Thoughts On Warhol And The Future Of Transformative Works, Zvi S. Rosen

Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property

No abstract provided.

Enablement For Genus Claims: A Bifurcated Approach, Jie Yang

Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property

Abstract After two jury trials, two trips to the Federal Circuit, and two petitions to the Supreme Court, the Court this past term decided Amgen Inc. v. Sanofi without much controversy. In a unanimous decision, the Court affirmed the invalidation of Amgen’s functional antibody claims for lack of enablement. As a result, inventors down the road, not just life sciences companies, may find it more difficult to obtain broad patents. Although the Court was clear that Amgen may not “monopolize an entire class of things defined by their function,” the opinion fell short of guiding lower courts on how to …