Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Duquesne University (1665)
- Duke Law (632)
- Georgetown University Law Center (621)
- William & Mary Law School (540)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (513)
-
- Columbia Law School (506)
- University of Colorado Law School (438)
- University of Michigan Law School (362)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (323)
- University of Georgia School of Law (296)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (280)
- Cornell University Law School (270)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (268)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (249)
- Boston University School of Law (246)
- Roger Williams University (191)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (169)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (166)
- Notre Dame Law School (156)
- Pace University (148)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (137)
- University of Pittsburgh School of Law (137)
- American University Washington College of Law (136)
- University of Richmond (132)
- Cleveland State University (127)
- Florida State University College of Law (122)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (119)
- New York Law School (109)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (109)
- Fordham Law School (106)
- Keyword
-
- Philosophy (1655)
- Theology (1592)
- Hallowed Secularism (1395)
- American Religious Democracy (1377)
- Constitutional law (1130)
-
- Constitutional Law (907)
- Politics (881)
- Law (701)
- Constitution (663)
- Supreme Court (654)
- First Amendment (435)
- Religion (426)
- United States (388)
- History (380)
- United States Supreme Court (354)
- Government (348)
- Federalism (328)
- Democracy (277)
- Judicial review (257)
- Separation of powers (242)
- Congress (222)
- Human rights (218)
- Originalism (217)
- Civil rights (197)
- United States Constitution (197)
- Constitutional interpretation (196)
- Due process (196)
- Fourth Amendment (183)
- Jurisprudence (182)
- Equal protection (179)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (1794)
- Hallowed Secularism (1395)
- Faculty Publications (785)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (563)
- Scholarly Works (558)
-
- Articles (530)
- All Faculty Scholarship (506)
- Supreme Court Case Files (371)
- Publications (343)
- Journal Articles (324)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (259)
- Scholarly Articles (248)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (240)
- Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy Sidebar (233)
- Law Faculty Publications (188)
- Faculty Articles (168)
- Ledewitz Papers (163)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (144)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (143)
- Scholarly Publications (122)
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (116)
- Popular Media (101)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (96)
- Nevada Supreme Court Summaries (95)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (95)
- Newspaper Columns (87)
- Law Faculty Articles and Essays (81)
- Articles & Chapters (80)
- Schmooze 'tickets' (79)
- Law Faculty Research Publications (76)
- File Type
Articles 1 - 30 of 12371
Full-Text Articles in Law
Transforming Constitutional Doctrine Through Mandatory Appeals From Three-Judge District Courts: The Warren And Burger Courts And Their Contemporary Lessons, Michael E. Solimine
Transforming Constitutional Doctrine Through Mandatory Appeals From Three-Judge District Courts: The Warren And Burger Courts And Their Contemporary Lessons, Michael E. Solimine
Faculty Articles and Other Publications
Judicial interpretations of the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment underwent significant change, both expanding and retrenching in various ways, in Supreme Court doctrine during the Warren and Burger Courts. An underappreciated influence on the change is the method by which those cases reached the Court’s docket. A significant number of the cases reached the Court’s docket not by discretionary grants of writs of certiorari, as occurred in most other cases, but by mandatory appeals directly from three-judge district courts. This article makes several contributions regarding the important changes in these doctrines during the Warren Court …
A Neo-Federalist View Of The Supreme Court’S Docket: Analyzing Case Selection And Ideological Alignment, Arthur D. Hellman
A Neo-Federalist View Of The Supreme Court’S Docket: Analyzing Case Selection And Ideological Alignment, Arthur D. Hellman
Articles
For more than 70 years, scholars have engaged in an intense debate over a core constitutional question: what restraints does the Constitution place on Congress’s power to limit the jurisdiction of the federal courts? Far less attention has been given to an equally important real-life question: how does the operation of the jurisdiction, as defined by Congress and the Supreme Court, comport with the assigned role of the federal courts in the system of government established by the Constitution? This Article takes a novel approach: it draws on constitutional theory to devise a set of tools for addressing the operational …
Video Analytics And Fourth Amendment Vision, Andrew Guthrie Ferguson
Video Analytics And Fourth Amendment Vision, Andrew Guthrie Ferguson
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
What does the Fourth Amendment have to say about video analytics running on citywide camera systems? Video analytics (also known as computer vision) involves hardware and software in cameras that turns video surveillance streams into useful data, identifying, categorizing, matching, and alerting police about objects, people, and incidents. Video analytics can identify objects (e.g., hat, backpack, person, car) and track that person or thing back in time and through the streets using video surveillance footage. For police officers conducting virtual patrols or retrospective investigations, video analytics lets police scan thousands of linked cameras for suspicious behavior or a particular suspect, …
Fred Korematsu And His Fight For Justice, Honorable Denny Chin, Kathy Hirata Chin
Fred Korematsu And His Fight For Justice, Honorable Denny Chin, Kathy Hirata Chin
Constitution Day Lectures
Hofstra Law marks Constitution Day 2024 by staging a re-enactment of the trial and events leading up to the Supreme Court’s controversial 1944 decision to uphold the constitutionality of interning Japanese-Americans solely on the basis of their race. The Hon. Denny Chin, a senior judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, and his wife Kathy Hirata Chin, created the re-enactments and will preside with Hofstra Law students and faculty playing parts in the re-enactment. Professor Ku will moderate a discussion of the implications of the Korematsu case after the re-enactment.
Judge Chin was confirmed as a …
From Publius To Santos: Congressional Expulsion And The Enforcement Of Legislative Virtue, Matthew A. Edwards
From Publius To Santos: Congressional Expulsion And The Enforcement Of Legislative Virtue, Matthew A. Edwards
Emory Law Journal Online
On December 1, 2023, in a historic decision, the U.S. House of Representatives voted to expel Congressperson George Santos. Prior to Santos’s expulsion, only two members of the House had been expelled since the Civil War. In fact, although he was under indictment, Santos was the first member to be expelled from the House without first being convicted of a federal crime or supporting the Confederacy. Santos presented an unusual case, however. By the time that he was expelled, Santos was nationally reviled for fabricating nearly every aspect of his personal biography. Although it is difficult to know what the …
Constitutional Law Through Co-Curricular Civic Engagement, Jason M. Leggett
Constitutional Law Through Co-Curricular Civic Engagement, Jason M. Leggett
Open Educational Resources
No abstract provided.
The Complexity Of American Federalism, Christian G. Fritz
The Complexity Of American Federalism, Christian G. Fritz
Faculty Scholarship
For the Balkinization Symposium on Alison L. LaCroix, The Interbellum Constitution: Union, Commerce, and Slavery in the Age of Federalisms (Yale University Press, 2024).
Alison LaCroix’s insightful new book, The Interbellum Constitution, builds on an often-overlooked fact: that Americans living before the Civil War did not know they were part of an “antebellum” period. That oversight has contributed to a conventional narrative of constitutional history and doctrine during the first half of the nineteenth-century that tends to read that history and doctrine backwards through the lens of a war that contemporaries did not know would define them. From this …
"Zoning" Matters: Rluipa And The New Normal Of Religious Discrimination, Michael Allan Wolf
"Zoning" Matters: Rluipa And The New Normal Of Religious Discrimination, Michael Allan Wolf
UF Law Faculty Publications
The protection of religious freedom under federal law waxes and wanes, depending on two unpredictable factors: judicial activism and congressional action. A review of dozens of cases involving alleged violations of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA), including two recent cases heard by the Supreme Court and the Fourth Circuit, reveals for the first time that many litigants and judges have ignored the congressional injunction to limit the reach of RLUIPA to two (and only two) forms of land-use regulation: zoning and landmarking. Plaintiffs have instead used RLUIPA to challenge water and sewer, septic, fire prevention, building, …
Rwu School Of Law Social Justice Camp, Roger Williams University School Of Law
Rwu School Of Law Social Justice Camp, Roger Williams University School Of Law
School of Law Conferences, Lectures & Events
No abstract provided.
First Amendment And Media Law Diversity Moot Court Competition, Roger Williams University School Of Law, Michelle Choate
First Amendment And Media Law Diversity Moot Court Competition, Roger Williams University School Of Law, Michelle Choate
School of Law Conferences, Lectures & Events
No abstract provided.
Amicus Brief Of Federal Courts Scholars In Alabama V. California, Supreme Court Of The United States, No. 158, Original, Arthur D. Hellman, F. Andrew Hessick, Derek T. Muller, Robert J. Pushaw
Amicus Brief Of Federal Courts Scholars In Alabama V. California, Supreme Court Of The United States, No. 158, Original, Arthur D. Hellman, F. Andrew Hessick, Derek T. Muller, Robert J. Pushaw
Amici Briefs
This amicus brief was submitted to the United States Supreme Court in support of the motion by Alabama and other states to file a bill of complaint against California and other states under the Court’s original jurisdiction. The brief addresses one issue alone: it argues that under Article III of the Constitution and section 1251 of the Judicial Code, the Court has a duty to exercise its exclusive, original jurisdiction over actions in which one state brings suit against another state. The brief takes no position on any other procedural or merits issues that may be raised by the motion …
Brief For Amici Curiae New York State Legal Scholars In Support Of Defendants-Respondents, Wilfred U. Codrington Iii, Michael Pollack
Brief For Amici Curiae New York State Legal Scholars In Support Of Defendants-Respondents, Wilfred U. Codrington Iii, Michael Pollack
Faculty Amicus Briefs
This document presents a legal brief submitted by amici curiae in a case involving prominent Republican plaintiffs challenging the constitutionality of New York State's absentee voting provisions. The brief emphasizes the fundamental importance of voting as enshrined in the New York Constitution, particularly Article II, which guarantees suffrage to all qualified citizens. It argues that the Constitution's democracy principle supports broad access to the electoral process, countering the plaintiffs' claims that the absentee voting provisions are overly restrictive. The amici curiae assert that the legislative authority to expand voting access is consistent with the overarching democratic commitments of the Constitution. …
Understanding 303 Creative Llc In A Polycentric Constitutional World, Meg Penrose
Understanding 303 Creative Llc In A Polycentric Constitutional World, Meg Penrose
Faculty Scholarship
The evolution of rights following Obergefell is not over. Creative 303 LLC marked a new phase in the ongoing legal challenges over the rights and ceremonies attending same-sex marriage. This Essay addresses the anticipated limits of 303 Creative LLC.
The Essay proceeds in three parts. First, how does 303 Creative LLC impact government employees? What rights, if any, should government employees be able to raise in light of 303 Creative LLC? Second, what does 303 Creative LLC mean for private marketplace vendors engaging in expressive commerce? Vendors, particularly wedding vendors, often create unique items for weddings. Will the law focus …
Brief Amicus Curiae Of Professor Matthew Steilen In Support Of Petitioners, Tiktok Inc. V. Garland (D.C. Cir. 2024) (No. 24-1113), Matthew J. Steilen
Brief Amicus Curiae Of Professor Matthew Steilen In Support Of Petitioners, Tiktok Inc. V. Garland (D.C. Cir. 2024) (No. 24-1113), Matthew J. Steilen
Other Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Digital Barter Taxes: A Legal Defense, Young Ran (Christine) Kim, Darien Shanske
Digital Barter Taxes: A Legal Defense, Young Ran (Christine) Kim, Darien Shanske
Faculty Articles
This short essay, aimed at state legislators, defends digital barter taxes from the most common legal objections.
Free Speech Originalism: Unconstraining In Theory And Opportunistic In Practice, Caroline Mala Corbin
Free Speech Originalism: Unconstraining In Theory And Opportunistic In Practice, Caroline Mala Corbin
Articles
Courts should not apply originalism in freedom of expression cases. Originalists claim that originalism prevents judges from imposing their own views. It does not-not in theory and not in practice. Instead, as the treatment of hate speech bans suggests, it is not principles but outcomes that determine whether and which version of originalism is used. Moreover, a true originalist First Amendment would likely lead to impoverished free speech protections.
Part I provides background on original public meaning originalism, the iteration of originalism currently favored by scholars. It also explains how the theory falls short of its original promise of limiting …
Criminalizing Transgender Care, Lewis Grossman
Criminalizing Transgender Care, Lewis Grossman
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
Since 2021, twenty-four states, in extraordinarily quick succession, have enacted statutes banning physicians from prescribing puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones to minors for treatment of gender dysphoria. Although the Food and Drug Administration has not approved these drugs for this use, off-label prescribing is a common practice, and leading medical organizations all agree that this off-label use of puberty blockers and sex hormones is an essential component of transgender medical care. These state laws thus represent an extreme, and unprecedented, interference with the provision of standard-of-care medicine. This article, after exploring the ongoing litigation challenging these bans, argues that they …
Decoding Dobbs: A Typology To Better Understand The Roberts Court's Jurisprudence, Katie Yoder
Decoding Dobbs: A Typology To Better Understand The Roberts Court's Jurisprudence, Katie Yoder
Honors Projects
The U.S. Supreme Court first recognized Substantive Due Process (“SDP”) in the early twentieth century. In Lochner v. New York, the Court established that there are certain unenumerated rights that are implied by the Fourteenth Amendment.Though SDP originated in a case about worker’s rights and liberties, it quickly became relevant to many cases surrounding personal intimate decisions involving health, safety, marriage, sexual activity, and reproduction.Over the past 60 years, the Court relied upon SDP to justify expanding a fundamental right to privacy, liberty, and the right to medical decision making. Specifically, the court applied these concepts to allow for freedoms …
Reynolds Revisited: The Original Meaning Of Reynolds V. United States And Free Exercise After Fulton, Clark B. Lombardi
Reynolds Revisited: The Original Meaning Of Reynolds V. United States And Free Exercise After Fulton, Clark B. Lombardi
Articles
This Article calls for a profound reevaluation of the stories that are being told today about the Supreme Court’s free exercise jurisprudence starting with the Court’s seminal 1879 decision in Reynolds v. United States and proceeding up to the present day. Scholars and judges today agree that the Supreme Court in Reynolds interpreted the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment to protect only religious belief and not religiously motivated action. All casebooks today embrace this interpretation of the case, and the Supreme Court has regularly endorsed it over the past twenty years, most recently in 2022. However, this Article …
Constitutional Rights And Remedial Consistency, Katherine Mims Crocker
Constitutional Rights And Remedial Consistency, Katherine Mims Crocker
Faculty Scholarship
When the Supreme Court declined definitively to block Texas’s S.B. 8, which effectively eliminated pre-enforcement federal remedies for what was then a plainly unconstitutional restriction on abortion rights, a prominent criticism was that the majority would have never tolerated the similar treatment of preferred legal protections—like gun rights. This refrain reemerged when California enacted a copycat regime for firearms regulation. This theme sounds in the deep-rooted idea that judge-made law should adhere to generality and neutrality values requiring doctrines to derive justification from controlling a meaningful class of cases ascertained by objective legal criteria.
This Article is about consistency, and …
Computationally Assessing Suspicion, Wesley M. Oliver
Computationally Assessing Suspicion, Wesley M. Oliver
Law Faculty Publications
Law enforcement officers performing drug interdiction on interstate highways have to decide nearly every day whether there is reasonable suspicion to detain motorists until a trained dog can sniff for the presence of drugs. The officers’ assessments are often wrong, however, and lead to unnecessary detentions of innocent persons and the suppression of drugs found on guilty ones. We propose a computational method of evaluating suspicion in these encounters and offer experimental results from early efforts demonstrating its feasibility. With the assistance of large language and predictive machine learning models, it appears that judges, advocates, and even police officers could …
Constitutional Rights And Remedial Consistency, Katherine Mims Crocker
Constitutional Rights And Remedial Consistency, Katherine Mims Crocker
Faculty Publications
When the Supreme Court declined definitively to block Texas’s S.B. 8, which effectively eliminated pre-enforcement federal remedies for what was then a plainly unconstitutional restriction on abortion rights, a prominent criticism was that the majority would have never tolerated the similar treatment of preferred legal protections—like gun rights. This refrain reemerged when California enacted a copycat regime for firearms regulation. This theme sounds in the deep-rooted idea that judge-made law should adhere to generality and neutrality values requiring doctrines to derive justification from controlling a meaningful class of cases ascertained by objective legal criteria.
This Article is about consistency, and …
The Original Meaning Of Commerce In The Indian Commerce Clause, Gregory Ablavsky
The Original Meaning Of Commerce In The Indian Commerce Clause, Gregory Ablavsky
Connecticut Law Review
In Haaland v. Brackeen, the Supreme Court returned to the foundational question of federal authority over relations between the United States and Native nations, long known as “Indian affairs.” The decision reaffirmed well-established precedent affirming broad federal authority in the area, but it also underscored ongoing disagreement, as Justices Gorsuch and Thomas offered lengthy and dueling investigations of the original understanding.
This Essay explores one aspect of that history: the original meaning of “commerce” in the Indian Commerce Clause. Nearly a decade ago, I wrote an article that sought, as its title indicated, to move “beyond the Indian Commerce Clause.” …
American Democracy And The State Constitutional Convention, Jonathan L. Marshfield
American Democracy And The State Constitutional Convention, Jonathan L. Marshfield
UF Law Faculty Publications
Fears about the health of American democracy are high. And with the Supreme Court loosening federal constraints and returning critical substantive issues to the states, there is new and particular interest in the democratic quality of state institutions. While some see opportunity in this decentralization, there is also good reason to believe that many states are failing to deliver on America’s democratic ideals. There are growing concerns, for example, that many state legislatures are enacting laws wildly misaligned with majority preferences on important issues like guns, abortion, LGBTQ+ rights, and healthcare. There are also deeper structural concerns regarding partisan gerrymandering, …
The Perennial Eclipse: Race, Immigration, And How Latinx Count In American Politics, Rachel F. Moran
The Perennial Eclipse: Race, Immigration, And How Latinx Count In American Politics, Rachel F. Moran
Faculty Scholarship
In 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Evenwel v. Abbott, a case challenging the use of total population in state legislative apportionment as a violation of the Equal Protection Clause. The plaintiffs sued Texas, alleging that the State impermissibly diluted their voting power because they lived in areas with a high proportion of voting-age citizens. When total population was used to draw district lines, the plaintiffs had to compete with more voters to get their desired electoral outcomes than was true for voters in districts with low proportions of voting-age citizens. The Court rejected the argument, finding that states enjoy …
The Private Litigation Impact Of New York’S Green Amendment, Evan Bianchi, Sean Di Luccio, Martin Lockman, Vincent Nolette
The Private Litigation Impact Of New York’S Green Amendment, Evan Bianchi, Sean Di Luccio, Martin Lockman, Vincent Nolette
Sabin Center for Climate Change Law
The increasing urgency of climate change, combined with federal environmental inaction under the Trump Administration, inspired a wave of environmental action at the state and local level. Building on the environmental movement of the 1970s, activists have pushed to amend more than a dozen state constitutions to include “green amendments” — self-executing individual rights to a clean environment. In 2022, New York activists succeeded, and New York’s Green Amendment (the NYGA) now provides that “Each person shall have a right to clean air and water, and a healthful environment.”
However, the power of the NYGA and similar green amendments turns …
The Anti-Innovation Supreme Court: Major Questions, Delegation, Chevron And More, Jack M. Beermann
The Anti-Innovation Supreme Court: Major Questions, Delegation, Chevron And More, Jack M. Beermann
Faculty Scholarship
The Supreme Court of the United States has generally been a very aggressive enforcer of legal limitations on governmental power. In various periods in its history, the Court has gone far beyond enforcing clearly expressed and easily ascertainable constitutional and statutory provisions and has suppressed innovation by the other branches that do not necessarily transgress widely held social norms. Novel assertions of legislative power, novel interpretations of federal statutes, statutes that are in tension with well-established common law rules and state laws adopted by only a few states are suspect simply because they are novel or rub up against tradition. …
Discharging Equity: Harrington V. Purdue Pharma L.P. And The Validity Of Nonconsensual Third-Party Releases, Andrew Klauber
Discharging Equity: Harrington V. Purdue Pharma L.P. And The Validity Of Nonconsensual Third-Party Releases, Andrew Klauber
Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy Sidebar
In September 2019, Purdue Pharma L.P. petitioned for bankruptcy in the Southern District of New York. Purdue, which the Sackler family had owned and operated for decades, developed and aggressively marketed addictive opioid products, contributing to the modern opioid epidemic. The tsunami of litigation arising from the opioid epidemic gave rise to claims against Purdue and the Sackler family estimated to total more than $40 trillion, causing Purdue to petition for Chapter 11 bankruptcy.
In Purdue’s plan of reorganization, it employed a nonconsensual third-party release to discharge claims against the Sackler family. Nonconsensual third-party releases controversially enjoin parties to a …
Anti-Press Bias: A Response To Andersen Jones And West's Presuming Trustworthiness, Erin C. Carroll
Anti-Press Bias: A Response To Andersen Jones And West's Presuming Trustworthiness, Erin C. Carroll
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
Professors RonNell Andersen Jones and Sonja R. West’s Presuming Trustworthiness is a deeply depressing read. That is what makes it so good. The article is a clear-eyed, data-driven approach to assessing just how endangered the legal status of the free press is. Given the universality of the agreement that a free press is central to democracy, Andersen Jones and West’s message is vital. Presuming Trustworthiness should raise alarms.
In response, I hope this essay can serve as a bullhorn. I want to amplify what Andersen Jones and West’s research and data bear out. Not only has the Supreme Court ceased …
The Unconstitutionality Of Underfunded Public Defender Systems, Braden Daniels
The Unconstitutionality Of Underfunded Public Defender Systems, Braden Daniels
Senior Honors Theses
When a defendant is ineffectively represented by a public defender due to an underfunded public defender system, a defendant whose public defender provides him only cursory representation is entitled to a new trial only if blatantly innocent. The U.S. Supreme Court should follow its precedent and declare systemically underfunded public defender systems unconstitutional, with cases meriting reversal when the underfunding is to blame for unreasonable attorney errors, regardless of prejudice. This stems logically from the Court’s holdings in Gideon v. Wainwright, Strickland v. Washington, and United States v. Cronic. Many have argued for the reversal or modification …