Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Antitrust (2)
- Boards of directors (1)
- Chicago School (1)
- Complexity (1)
- Consumer harm (1)
-
- Corporate governance (1)
- Corporate law (1)
- Corporations (1)
- David Kershaw (1)
- Digital platforms (1)
- Disclosure rules (1)
- Duty of loyalty (1)
- Emerging issues (1)
- Fiduciary law (1)
- Harold Marsh (1)
- Herbert Hovenkamp (1)
- Legal history (1)
- Legal intervention (1)
- Majority independent board (1)
- Markets (1)
- Monopoly (1)
- Neo-Brandeis (1)
- Neo-Brandeisian/hipster antitrust movement (1)
- New Harvard School core commitments (1)
- Regulation (1)
- Remedies (1)
- Robustness (1)
- Self-dealing transactions (1)
- Tying (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Business
Addressing The Divisions In Antitrust Policy, Herbert J. Hovenkamp
Addressing The Divisions In Antitrust Policy, Herbert J. Hovenkamp
All Faculty Scholarship
This is the text of an interview conducted in writing by Professor A. Douglas Melamed, Stanford Law School.
Appreciating The Overlooked Contributions Of The New Harvard School, Christopher S. Yoo
Appreciating The Overlooked Contributions Of The New Harvard School, Christopher S. Yoo
All Faculty Scholarship
My colleague, Herbert Hovenkamp, is almost universally recognized as the most cited and the most authoritative US antitrust scholar. Among his many honors, his status as the senior author of the authoritative Areeda and Hovenkamp treatise makes him the unquestioned leader of the New Harvard School, which has long served as the bellwether for how courts are likely to resolve emerging issues in modern antitrust doctrine. Unfortunately, its defining tenets and its positions on emerging issues remain surprisingly obscure. My contribution to this festschrift explores the core commitments that distinguish the New Harvard School from other approaches to antitrust. It …
Reconsidering The Evolutionary Erosion Account Of Corporate Fiduciary Law, William W. Bratton
Reconsidering The Evolutionary Erosion Account Of Corporate Fiduciary Law, William W. Bratton
All Faculty Scholarship
This Article reconsiders the dominant account of corporate law’s duty of loyalty, which asserts that the courts have steadily relaxed standards of fiduciary scrutiny applied to self-dealing by corporate managers across more than a century of history—to the great detriment of the shareholder interest. The account originated in Harold Marsh, Jr.’s foundational article, Are Directors Trustees? Conflicts of Interest and Corporate Morality, published in The Business Lawyer in 1966. Marsh’s showing of historical lassitude has been successfully challenged in a recent book by Professor David Kershaw. This Article takes Professor Kershaw’s critique a step further, asking whether the evolutionary …