Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Medicine and Health Sciences (4)
- Law (3)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (3)
- Organizational Behavior and Theory (2)
- Arts and Humanities (1)
-
- Behavior and Behavior Mechanisms (1)
- Biotechnology (1)
- Business Law, Public Responsibility, and Ethics (1)
- Cognition and Perception (1)
- Engineering (1)
- Food and Drug Law (1)
- Insurance (1)
- Insurance Law (1)
- Labor Relations (1)
- Labor and Employment Law (1)
- Life Sciences (1)
- Medical Jurisprudence (1)
- Mental and Social Health (1)
- Other Medicine and Health Sciences (1)
- Privacy Law (1)
- Psychiatry and Psychology (1)
- Psychology (1)
- Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration (1)
- Public Health (1)
- Religion (1)
- Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion (1)
- Risk Analysis (1)
- Substance Abuse and Addiction (1)
- Technology and Innovation (1)
- Keyword
-
- Management (2)
- Safety (2)
- Alcohol (1)
- Assessment (1)
- Biotech (1)
-
- Cap (1)
- Child proof (1)
- Child-proof caps (1)
- Drug (1)
- Drug testing (1)
- Error (1)
- FDA (1)
- Factors (1)
- Failure (1)
- Human (1)
- Impairment (1)
- Industry (1)
- Medical malpractice (1)
- New Zealand (1)
- No-fault (1)
- Organizational (1)
- Oversight (1)
- PPPA (1)
- Participation (1)
- Policy (1)
- Privacy (1)
- Railroad (1)
- Rails (1)
- Regulations (1)
- Reinsurance (1)
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Business
Risk Assessment And Risk Management: Mending The Schism, Richard M. Sedman, Paul W. Hadley,
Risk Assessment And Risk Management: Mending The Schism, Richard M. Sedman, Paul W. Hadley,
RISK: Health, Safety & Environment (1990-2002)
The authors suggest that giving different individuals the responsibility for assessing and managing Risk may sometimes be counterproductive.
The Supreme Court As Risk Manager: An Analysis Of Skinner, Todd F. Volyn, James F. Mogan, Lisa M. White
The Supreme Court As Risk Manager: An Analysis Of Skinner, Todd F. Volyn, James F. Mogan, Lisa M. White
RISK: Health, Safety & Environment (1990-2002)
Examining a recent case in which the U.S. Supreme Court approved the collection of blood and urine samples from railroad employees, the authors conclude that, in attempting to improve railroad safety, both majority and minority opinions reflected undue emphasis on technical issues and inadequate attention to the intangible social values underlying traditional Constitutional rights to privacy.
Book Review, Thomas G. Field Jr.
Book Review, Thomas G. Field Jr.
RISK: Health, Safety & Environment (1990-2002)
Review of the following: lAIN HAY, MONEY, MEDICINE AND MALPRACTICE IN AMERICAN SOCIETY. (Praeger 1992) [244 pp.] Abbreviations, annotated list of personal communications, figures, glossary, index, full legal citations, notes, preface, references, tables. LC 91-38477, ISBN 0-674-13645-4. [Cloth $49.95. P.O. Box 5007, Westwood CT 06881-9990.]
Book Review, Bradley J. Olson
Book Review, Bradley J. Olson
RISK: Health, Safety & Environment (1990-2002)
BIOTECHNOLOGY: ASSESSING SOCIAL IMPACTS AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS. (David J. Webber, ed., Greenwood Press 1990) [239 pp.] Bibliography, contributor data, index, notes, preface, tables. LC: 90-2935; ISBN: 0-313-27454-1. [Cloth. $42.95. P.O.B. 5007, Westport, CT 06881]
Risk And Value Judgments: A Case Study Of The Poison Prevention Packaging Act, William E. Hilton
Risk And Value Judgments: A Case Study Of The Poison Prevention Packaging Act, William E. Hilton
RISK: Health, Safety & Environment (1990-2002)
Mr. Hilton attempts to show why important choices presented in current proposals to amend child-resistant packaging regulations are fundamentally normative. He then argues that these choices should not be obscured by the technical issues.
Nothing Recedes Like Success - Risk Analysis And The Organizational Amplification Of Risks, William R. Freudenburg
Nothing Recedes Like Success - Risk Analysis And The Organizational Amplification Of Risks, William R. Freudenburg
RISK: Health, Safety & Environment (1990-2002)
Professor Freudenburg believes that there is room for improvement in Risk analysis, particularly in drawing on systematic studies of human behavior in the calculation of real, empirical probabilities of failure. The need is argued to be especially acute where technological Risks are associated with low expected probabilities of failure and are managed by human organizations for extended periods of time. This permits complacency to set in.