Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Digital Commons Network

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law

2013

Immigration

Articles 1 - 2 of 2

Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network

Dubious Deference: Reassessing Appellate Standards Of Review In Immigration Appeals, Michael Kagan Jan 2013

Dubious Deference: Reassessing Appellate Standards Of Review In Immigration Appeals, Michael Kagan

Scholarly Works

The long-standing doctrine of deferential review by appellate courts of findings of fact by administrative agencies is seriously flawed for two main reasons. First, the most prominent justification for deference relies on the empirical assumption that first-instance adjudicators are best able to determine the truth because they can directly view witness demeanor. Decades of social science research has proven this assumption about the value of demeanor false. Second, in principle, the deference rule applies to all types of administrative adjudication, with no attention to the relative gravity of interests at stake in different types of cases or to the varying …


Enforcing Masculinities At The Borders, Jamie R. Abrams Jan 2013

Enforcing Masculinities At The Borders, Jamie R. Abrams

Nevada Law Journal

No abstract provided.