Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Digital Commons Network

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law

Golden Gate University Law Review

2010

Intellectual property

Articles 1 - 3 of 3

Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network

The Ninth Circuit Lands A "Perfect 10" Applying Copyright Law To The Internet, Robert A. Mcfarlane Oct 2010

The Ninth Circuit Lands A "Perfect 10" Applying Copyright Law To The Internet, Robert A. Mcfarlane

Golden Gate University Law Review

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued three landmark decisions in 2007 that addressed how copyright protections apply to images that can be accessed over the Internet. Internet publisher Perfect 10 initiated these lawsuits based on allegations that its registered copyrights were infringed when unauthorized copies of its photographs appeared on third-party websites where they could be viewed, downloaded, and purchased without payment to Perfect 10. This Article briefly summarizes the facts of these three cases, explains the central holdings of each decision, and then concludes with a discussion of the collective impact that the three decisions have on enforcement …


Intellectual Property Law - Dreamwerks Production Group, Inc. V. Skg Studio, Thomas J. Murphy Sep 2010

Intellectual Property Law - Dreamwerks Production Group, Inc. V. Skg Studio, Thomas J. Murphy

Golden Gate University Law Review

In Dreamwerks Production Group, Inc. v. SKG Studio the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit evaluated whether the trademarks "Dreamwerks" and "Dream Works" were likely to confuse the reasonable consumer. Traditionally, a well-known, senior trademark user will sue a lesser-known, junior trademark user in order to protect its goodwill and prevent customer confusion. In Dreamwerks, however, the parties' positions were reversed, with the lesser-known, senior user, Dreamwerks Production Group, suing the better-known, yet junior user, SKG Studio. The Ninth Circuit held that, like every other new company, SKG Studio was required to select a name that would …


Copyright Protection In Factual Compilations: Feist Publications V. Rural Telephone Service Company "Altruism Expressed In Copyright Law", Sherrie Callis Sep 2010

Copyright Protection In Factual Compilations: Feist Publications V. Rural Telephone Service Company "Altruism Expressed In Copyright Law", Sherrie Callis

Golden Gate University Law Review

In the wake of Feist, copyright practitioners are scrambling to determine what it all means, and how best to protect their client's intellectual property rights and interests. While different views are presented, an expression of dismay is common. This note will address the question: are the copyright practitioners justified in their concern? Part I will outline the Constitutional underpinnings of copyright protection. More specifically, this Part will discuss the two theories underlying the case law in the circuit courts of appeal, including a discussion of their legal philosophies. Part II will examine the Court's decision in Feist. Part III will …