Judicial Ethics: Lessons From The Chicago Eight Trial, 2019 Loyola University Chicago, School of Law
Judicial Ethics: Lessons From The Chicago Eight Trial, Laurie L. Levenson
Loyola University Chicago Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Judges’ Misuse Of Contempt In Criminal Cases And Limits Of Advocacy, 2019 Loyola University Chicago, School of Law
Judges’ Misuse Of Contempt In Criminal Cases And Limits Of Advocacy, Peter A. Joy
Loyola University Chicago Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Judge Damon Keith: The Judicial Antidote To Judge Julius Hoffman Challenging Claims Of Unilateral Executive Authority, 2019 Loyola University Chicago, School of Law
Judge Damon Keith: The Judicial Antidote To Judge Julius Hoffman Challenging Claims Of Unilateral Executive Authority, Ellen Yaroshevsky
Loyola University Chicago Law Journal
From some of the highly-publicized trials of the 1960s—namely the trials of the Chicago Eight, Panther Twenty-One, and Weathermen—we can draw indispensable lessons about the role of the judges in upholding and promoting a fair justice system. The contrast to Judge Julius Hoffman’s notorious injudicious conduct in the Chicago Eight case is the courageous, thoughtful Judge Damon Keith, in the less publicized White Panther case in Detroit in the early 1970s. Judge Keith’s overriding sense of fairness exemplified the best of judicial independence in considering President Nixon’s claims of unilateral executive authority in United States v. Ayers and United States …
Intellectual Property: A Beacon For Reform Of Investor-State Dispute Settlement, 2019 Vanderbilt University Law School
Intellectual Property: A Beacon For Reform Of Investor-State Dispute Settlement, Daniel Gervais
Michigan Journal of International Law
This Article attempts to resolve clashes between intellectual property and investor-state dispute settlement (“ISDS”). ISDS clauses contained in bilateral, plurilateral, or multilateral trade and investment agreements give multinational investors (corporations) a right to sue a state in a binding proceeding before an independent arbitral tribunal. This jurisgenerative right to file a claim against a state in an international tribunal with mandatory jurisdiction is exceptional; it is generally reserved to other states. Only multinational corporations can use ISDS to file claims against states in which they invest, provided the state is party to a bilateral investment treaty (“BIT”) or a trade …
The Role Of Arbitration In Mexico’S Energy Reform Under The Amlo Administration, 2019 Penn State Law
The Role Of Arbitration In Mexico’S Energy Reform Under The Amlo Administration, Ava Ibanez
Arbitration Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Rise Of The Creative Law School, 2019 West Virginia University College of Law
The Rise Of The Creative Law School, Gregory W. Bowman
Faculty & Staff Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Scope And Justification Of The Right Of Publicity, 2019 St. John's University School of Law
Scope And Justification Of The Right Of Publicity, Jeremy N. Sheff
Faculty Publications
(Excerpt)
Thank you to Professor June Besek, and thanks to everyone here at Columbia for the invitation. June, to correct one of your introductions here—Mark McKenna is too humble to say so, but in addition to being a widely recognized scholar, he was elected yesterday to the American Law Institute, which is well deserved given his immense contributions to Intellectual Property Law scholarship.
Mark and I have talked about this topic, in part in preparation for today, and so a lot of what I say is going to reflect some of what he has said, and I think that is …
The Legal Imagination: Studies In The Nature Of Legal Thought And Expression, 2019 St. John's University School of Law
The Legal Imagination: Studies In The Nature Of Legal Thought And Expression, Rachel H. Smith
Faculty Publications
(Excerpt)
This book, now available in a 45th-anniversary edition, is a marvel for its breadth and creativity. It remains a must-read for lawyers, law students, and law professors, even those who are not familiar with the Law as Literature movement for which the book was a founding contribution. Those who read it decades ago would be well served by a revisit because the book’s care and attention to legal language remain uniquely powerful.
The Unparalleled Benefits Of Teaching Parallelism, 2019 St. John's University School of Law
The Unparalleled Benefits Of Teaching Parallelism, Rachel H. Smith
Faculty Publications
(Excerpt)
As a student, I never learned how to use parallel structure, or “parallelism,” as a writing technique. I didn’t even know the official term until I started teaching legal writing. But even if I couldn’t name it, I always knew I liked it. As a high-school history student, I felt its force in speeches like Abraham Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address, William Jennings Bryan’s Cross of Gold, and Martin Luther King Jr.’s I Have a Dream. Parallelism always felt to me like the place where poetry meets prose—where even the most mundane writing can start to sing.
Existential Copyright And Professional Photography, 2019 St. John's University School of Law
Existential Copyright And Professional Photography, Jessica Silbey, Eva E. Subotnik, Peter Dicola
Faculty Publications
Intellectual property law has intended benefits, but it also carries certain costs—deliberately so. Skeptics have asked: Why should intellectual property law exist at all? To get traction on that overly broad but still important inquiry, we decided to ask a new, preliminary question: What do creators in a particular industry actually use intellectual property for? In this first-of-its-kind study, we conducted thirty-two in-depth qualitative interviews of photographers about how copyright law functions within their creative and business practices. By learning the actual functions of copyright law on the ground, we can evaluate and contextualize existing theories of intellectual property. More …
The Lost History Of Insider Trading, 2019 St. John's University School of Law
The Lost History Of Insider Trading, Michael A. Perino
Faculty Publications
Common conceptions about the history of insider trading norms in the United States are inaccurate and incomplete. In his landmark 1966 book Insider Trading and the Stock Market, Dean Henry Manne depicted a world in which insider trading was both widespread and universally accepted. It was SEC enforcement efforts in the early 1960s, he contended, that swayed public opinion to condemn what had previously been considered a natural and unobjectionable market feature. For five decades, the legal academy has largely accepted Manne’s historical description, and the vigorous debates over whether the federal government should prosecute insider trading have assumed, …
Conflicting Norms: Impact Of The Model Law On Chapter 11'S Global Restructuring Role, 2019 St. John's University School of Law
Conflicting Norms: Impact Of The Model Law On Chapter 11'S Global Restructuring Role, G. Ray Warner
Faculty Publications
(Excerpt)
The Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency is said to embody the concept of modified universalism for cross-border insolvency matters. In a pure universalist system, a single proceeding would deal with all of the debtor’s assets and debts globally. This is in contrast to a purely territorial approach, where multiple local proceedings would be required; one in each jurisdiction where the debtor had assets or debts, but each limited to the assets and debts located in that jurisdiction. While universalism emphasizes the economic goals of insolvency theory – to maximize the value of the estate and minimize the expense of …
Human Rights Movements In The Middle East: Global Norms And Regional Particularities, 2019 St. John's University School of Law
Human Rights Movements In The Middle East: Global Norms And Regional Particularities, Catherine Baylin Duryea
Faculty Publications
(Excerpt)
The Middle East is often portrayed as an outlier when it comes to human rights, but rights are an important part of the political, diplomatic, and social fabric of the region. This chapter summarises regional trends in human rights advocacy at both the international and domestic levels. Popular movements for independence, equality for women, and protections for workers have deep roots in the region. When the United Nations began to enshrine these values into law after World War II, representatives from the Middle East were at the centre of the debates. In the following two decades, human rights largely …
The Changed Batna, 2019 St. John's University School of Law
The Changed Batna, Elayne E. Greenberg
Faculty Publications
(Excerpt)
This column invites readers to consider whether the adjudicated outcome should be relied on as a realistic benchmark for advocates and mediators. In everyday dispute resolution practice, advocates and mediators regularly consider an adjudicated decision to be a realistic point of comparison to a negotiated or mediated outcome. For example, when assessing the merits of settlement, lawyers preparing for a legal negotiation and mediation frequently consider the likely adjudicated outcome as their best alternative to a negotiated agreement (hereinafter BATNA). In mediation, mediators often focus parties and their lawyers on the cost, time and likelihood of a favorable adjudicated …
Legislating Morality: Moral Theory And Turpitudinous Crimes In Immigration Jurisprudence, 2019 St. John's University School of Law
Legislating Morality: Moral Theory And Turpitudinous Crimes In Immigration Jurisprudence, Abel Rodríguez, Jennifer A. Bulcock
Faculty Publications
Congress could have framed the country’s immigration policies in any number of ways. In significant part, it opted to frame them in moral terms. The crime involving moral turpitude is among the most pervasive and pernicious classifications in immigration law. In the Immigration and Nationality Act, it is virtually ubiquitous, appearing everywhere from the deportability and mandatory detention grounds to the inadmissibility and naturalization grounds. In effect, it acts as a gatekeeper for those who wish to enter and remain in the country, obtain lawful permanent residence, travel abroad after admission, or become United States citizens. With limited exceptions, noncitizens …
The Faith Of My Fathers, 2019 St. John's University School of Law
The Faith Of My Fathers, Robert H. Jackson, John Q. Barrett
Faculty Publications
(Excerpt)
In his final years, United States Supreme Court Justice Robert H. Jackson worked on a number of autobiographical writing projects. The previously unknown Jackson text that follows this Introduction is one such writing. Justice Jackson wrote this essay in longhand on thirteen yellow legal pad pages in the early 1950s. It is Jackson’s writing about religion in his life.
After Justice Jackson’s death in 1954, his secretary Elsie L. Douglas found the thirteen pages among his papers. She concluded that the pages were “undoubtedly prepared as part of his autobiography,” typed them up, and gave a file folder containing …
Calls For Speculation: An Experimental Examination Of Juror Perceptions Of Attorney Objections, 2019 Cornell Law School
Calls For Speculation: An Experimental Examination Of Juror Perceptions Of Attorney Objections, Krystia Reed
Buffalo Law Review
Should attorneys object during trial? Does preserving the record outweigh the potential costs of objections, such as upsetting the jury or drawing attention to the evidence? Legal scholars have opined on the delicate balance attorneys must strike in their decisions to object, but researchers have offered little to guide attorneys making these in-the-moment decisions. I discuss results from two empirical studies that provide evidence that attorneys have less to fear from objections than legal scholars suggest. Based on these results, I provide suggestions for practicing attorneys.
Expanding Access To Remedies Through E-Court Initiatives, 2019 University of Missouri School of Law
Expanding Access To Remedies Through E-Court Initiatives, Amy J. Schmitz
Buffalo Law Review
Virtual courthouses, artificial intelligence (AI) for determining cases, and algorithmic analysis for all types of legal issues have captured the interest of judges, lawyers, educators, commentators, business leaders, and policymakers. Technology has become the “fourth party” in dispute resolution through the growing field of online dispute resolution (ODR), which includes the use of a broad spectrum of technologies in negotiation, mediation, arbitration, and other dispute resolution processes. Indeed, ODR shows great promise for expanding access to remedies, or justice. In the United States and abroad, however, ODR has mainly thrived within e-commerce companies like eBay and Alibaba, while most public …
Politically Engaged Unionism: The Culinary Workers Union In Las Vegas, 2019 University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law
Politically Engaged Unionism: The Culinary Workers Union In Las Vegas, Ruben J. Garcia
Scholarly Works
This chapter introduces the reader to "politically engaged unionism" as demonstrated by the bargaining successes of The Culinary Workers Union Local 226 in Las Vegas, Nevada. Professor Ruben J. Garcia provides a brief background of the union and its member demographics, arguing it can serve as a model for unions across the country.
Drone Invasion: Unmanned Aerial Vehicles And The Right To Privacy, 2019 University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law
Drone Invasion: Unmanned Aerial Vehicles And The Right To Privacy, Rebecca L. Scharf
Scholarly Works
Since the birth of the concept of a legally-recognized right to privacy in Samuel D. Warren and Louis D. Brandeis’ influential 1890 law review article, The Right to Privacy, common law – with the aid of influential scholars -- has massaged the concept of privacy torts into actionable claims. But now, one of the most innovative technological advancements in recent years, the unmanned aerial vehicle, or drone, has created difficult challenges for plaintiffs and courts navigating common law privacy tort claims.
This Article explores the challenges of prosecution of the specific privacy tort of intrusion into seclusion involving non-governmental use …