Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Fourteenth Amendment Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

2,847 Full-Text Articles 2,253 Authors 1,810,374 Downloads 126 Institutions

All Articles in Fourteenth Amendment

Faceted Search

2,847 full-text articles. Page 38 of 71.

Living Under The Boot: Militarization And Peaceful Protest, Charlotte Guerra 2016 Seattle University School of Law

Living Under The Boot: Militarization And Peaceful Protest, Charlotte Guerra

Seattle Journal for Social Justice

No abstract provided.


Let’S Invest In People, Not Prisons: How Washington State Should Address Its Ex-Offender Unemployment Rate, Sara Taboada 2016 Seattle University School of Law

Let’S Invest In People, Not Prisons: How Washington State Should Address Its Ex-Offender Unemployment Rate, Sara Taboada

Seattle Journal for Social Justice

No abstract provided.


Persistence And Resistance: Women’S Leadership And Ending Gender-Based Violence In Guatemala, Serena Cosgrove, Kristi Lee 2016 Seattle University

Persistence And Resistance: Women’S Leadership And Ending Gender-Based Violence In Guatemala, Serena Cosgrove, Kristi Lee

Seattle Journal for Social Justice

No abstract provided.


Notes Toward A Critical Contemplation Of Law, Sonia K. Katyal 2016 Fordham University School of Law

Notes Toward A Critical Contemplation Of Law, Sonia K. Katyal

Sonia Katyal

In this tribute to Professor Derrick Bell’s legacy, Professor Katyal reflects on one of Bell’s greatest gifts: the necessary, and perhaps unfinished gift of critical contemplation of law, along with its possibilities and its concomitant limitations. In her paper, Katyal reflects on two seemingly disparate areas of civil rights that might benefit from Bell’s critical vision: the area of LGBT rights and equality, and federal Indian law. Relying on some of Bell’s most valuable insights, Katyal calls for the creation of a “critical sexuality studies” and a “critical indigenous studies” that employs some of Bell’s groundbreaking lessons in reimagining broader …


Religious Disestablishment And The Fourteenth Amendment, Joseph M. Snee, S.J. 2016 St. John's University School of Law

Religious Disestablishment And The Fourteenth Amendment, Joseph M. Snee, S.J.

The Catholic Lawyer

No abstract provided.


Constitutional Law-Aliens-Civil Service Commission Regulation Demanding Citizenship As A Prerequisite To Employment Deprives Resident Aliens Of Liberty Without Due Process Of Law, Sheryl A. Newberry 2016 University of Georgia School of Law

Constitutional Law-Aliens-Civil Service Commission Regulation Demanding Citizenship As A Prerequisite To Employment Deprives Resident Aliens Of Liberty Without Due Process Of Law, Sheryl A. Newberry

Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law

No abstract provided.


Constitutional Law—Fourth Amendment And Seizures— Accidental Seizures By Deadly Force: Who Is Seized During A Police Shootout? Plumhoff V. Rickard, 134 S. Ct. 2012 (2014)., Adam D. Franks 2016 University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law

Constitutional Law—Fourth Amendment And Seizures— Accidental Seizures By Deadly Force: Who Is Seized During A Police Shootout? Plumhoff V. Rickard, 134 S. Ct. 2012 (2014)., Adam D. Franks

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review

No abstract provided.


Combining Constitutional Clauses, Michael Coenen 2016 Louisiana State University Law Center

Combining Constitutional Clauses, Michael Coenen

Journal Articles

No abstract provided.


The Meanings Of The "Privileges And Immunities Of Citizens" On The Eve Of The Civil War, David R. Upham 2016 University of Dallas

The Meanings Of The "Privileges And Immunities Of Citizens" On The Eve Of The Civil War, David R. Upham

Notre Dame Law Review

The Fourteenth Amendment to our Constitution provides, in part, that “[n]o State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States.” This “Privileges or Immunities Clause” has been called “the darling of the professoriate.” Indeed, in the last decade alone, law professors have published dozens of articles treating the provision. The focus of this particular study is the interpretation of the “privileges and immunities of citizens” offered by American political actors, including not only judges, but also elected officials and private citizens, before the Fourteenth Amendment, and primarily, on the …


Keeping Cases From Black Juries: An Empirical Analysis Of How Race, Income Inequality, And Regional History Affect Tort Law, Donald G. Gifford, Brian Jones 2016 University of Maryland School of Law

Keeping Cases From Black Juries: An Empirical Analysis Of How Race, Income Inequality, And Regional History Affect Tort Law, Donald G. Gifford, Brian Jones

Washington and Lee Law Review

No abstract provided.


Due Process And Fundamental Rights, Martin A. Schwartz 2016 Touro Law Center

Due Process And Fundamental Rights, Martin A. Schwartz

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.


Appellate Division, Fourth Department, Masi Management Inc., V. Town Of Ogden, Courtney Aronowsky 2016 Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center

Appellate Division, Fourth Department, Masi Management Inc., V. Town Of Ogden, Courtney Aronowsky

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.


Appellate Division, First Department, Bertoldi V. New York, Sharon Ryan 2016 Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center

Appellate Division, First Department, Bertoldi V. New York, Sharon Ryan

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.


City Court, Watertown New York, People V. Rogers, Lisa Bartolomeo 2016 Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center

City Court, Watertown New York, People V. Rogers, Lisa Bartolomeo

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.


Supreme Court, Monroe County, People V. Owens, Wendy Holland 2016 Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center

Supreme Court, Monroe County, People V. Owens, Wendy Holland

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.


United States Court Of Appeals Second Circuit, Seabrook V. City Of New York, Wendy Holland 2016 Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center

United States Court Of Appeals Second Circuit, Seabrook V. City Of New York, Wendy Holland

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.


Court Of Appeals Of New York, People V. David, Courtney Blakeslee 2016 Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center

Court Of Appeals Of New York, People V. David, Courtney Blakeslee

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.


Brief Of The Catholic University Of America School Of Canon Law, The Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod, The Queens Federation Of Churches, And The Serbian Orthodox Church In North And South America, As Amici Curiae In Support Of Petitioners, Richard W. Garnett, David H. Hyams 2016 Notre Dame Law School

Brief Of The Catholic University Of America School Of Canon Law, The Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod, The Queens Federation Of Churches, And The Serbian Orthodox Church In North And South America, As Amici Curiae In Support Of Petitioners, Richard W. Garnett, David H. Hyams

Court Briefs

This brief addresses the importance of the principle of church autonomy and the protections provided by the First and Fourteenth Amendments and this Court's precedents regarding religious denominations' internal mandatory dispute-resolution procedures.


“Taking” A Constitutional Look At The State Bar Of Texas Proposal To Collect Interest On Attorney-Client Trust Accounts, Thomas E. Baker, Robert E. Wood Jr. 2016 Florida International University College of Law

“Taking” A Constitutional Look At The State Bar Of Texas Proposal To Collect Interest On Attorney-Client Trust Accounts, Thomas E. Baker, Robert E. Wood Jr.

Thomas E. Baker

No abstract provided.


Why The Right To Elective Abortion Fails Casey'S Own Interest-Balancing Methodology—And Why It Matters, Stephen G. Gilles 2016 Quinnipiac University School of Law

Why The Right To Elective Abortion Fails Casey'S Own Interest-Balancing Methodology—And Why It Matters, Stephen G. Gilles

Notre Dame Law Review

Casey adopted a new, interest-balancing framework for the right to elective abortion while preserving the core of that right. But by declining to address whether the right to elective abortion can be justified in interest-balancing terms, Casey opened the door to unduly stringent applications of the undue-burden standard and, no less importantly, to future extensions of the right. By ruling that the state’s interest in protecting pre-viable fetal life outweighs the woman’s interest in an elective abortion, while preserving that right on stare decisis grounds, the Court could ensure that the balance it struck in Casey—and that “was central …


Digital Commons powered by bepress