Legislative Delegations And The Elections Clause, 2016 Pepperdine University School of Law
Legislative Delegations And The Elections Clause, Derek T. Muller
Florida State University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Rescuing Retrogression, 2016 Indiana University MicKinney School of Law
Rescuing Retrogression, Michael J. Pitts
Florida State University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Voting Is Association, 2016 The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law
Voting Is Association, Daniel P. Tokaji
Florida State University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Fighting To Lose The Vote: How The Solider Voting Acts Of 1942 And 1944 Disenfranchised America's Armed Forces, 2016 New York Law School
Fighting To Lose The Vote: How The Solider Voting Acts Of 1942 And 1944 Disenfranchised America's Armed Forces, Molly Guptill Manning
Articles & Chapters
No abstract provided.
Judicial "Enforcement" Of A Grand Election Bargain, 2016 Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law
Judicial "Enforcement" Of A Grand Election Bargain, Michael J. Pitts
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Aggregate Corruption, 2016 University of Virginia School of Law
Aggregate Corruption, Michael D. Gilbert, Emily Reeder
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
A Most Precious Right: Equal Protection, Voter Photo Identification, And The Battle Brewing In Texas, 2016 University of Georgia School of Law
A Most Precious Right: Equal Protection, Voter Photo Identification, And The Battle Brewing In Texas, Emily V. Cox
Georgia Law Review
On a Tuesday in November, millions of Americans show
up and cast their votes, even in the face of cynicism,
perceived futility, and disappointment with the politicians
in Washington. It is the birthright of every citizen, and
there is simply nothing more fundamentally American.
The future of this right is now uncertain in the wake of the
United States Supreme Court decisions Crawford and
Shelby County. This Note suggests finding certainty by
re-framing the current test for the constitutionality of state
voting restrictions, the Anderson-Burdick Balancing Test.
This new imagining of the current test hinges on
identifying the nature of …
State Judges And The Right To Vote, 2016 University of Kentucky College of Law
State Judges And The Right To Vote, Joshua A. Douglas
Law Faculty Scholarly Articles
State courts are paramount in defining the constitutional right to vote. This primacy of state courts exists in part because the right to vote is a state-based right protected under state constitutions. In addition, election administration is largely state-driven, with states regulating most of the rules for casting and counting ballots. State law thus guarantees—and state courts interpret—the voting rights that we cherish so much as a society. State courts that issue rulings broadly defining the constitutional right to vote best protect the most fundamental right in our democracy; state decisions that constrain voting to a narrower scope do harm …
In Defense Of Lowering The Voting Age, 2016 University of Kentucky
In Defense Of Lowering The Voting Age, Joshua A. Douglas
Law Faculty Scholarly Articles
This Essay outlines the various policy arguments in favor of lowering the voting age to sixteen. Part I presents a very brief history of the voting age in U.S. elections. It notes that setting the voting age at eighteen is, in many ways, a historical accident, so lowering the voting age for local elections does not cut against historical norms. Part II explains that there are no constitutional barriers to local jurisdictions lowering the voting age for their own elections. Part III highlights the benefits to democracy and representation that lowering the voting age will engender. Turning eighteen represents a …
A Pivotal Moment For Election Law, 2016 University of Kentucky
A Pivotal Moment For Election Law, Joshua A. Douglas
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Voting Realism, 2016 University of Baltimore School of Law
Voting Realism, Gilda R. Daniels
Kentucky Law Journal
Since Shelby County v. Holder, the country has grown accustomed to life without the fl! strength of the Voting Rights Act. Efforts to restore Section 4 have been met with calls to ignore race conscious remedies and employ race neutral remedies for modem day voting rights violations. In this new normal, the country should adopt "voting realism" as the new approach to ensuring that law and reality work to address these new millennium methods of voter discrimination.
Economic Precarity, Race, And Voting Structures, 2016 West Virginia University
Economic Precarity, Race, And Voting Structures, Atiba R. Ellis
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Arbitrating Ballot Battles?, 2016 William & Mary Law School
Arbitrating Ballot Battles?, Rebecca Green
Kentucky Law Journal
This short article posits that arbitration is an under-explored mechanism for resolving post-election disputes. As Professor Edward Foley documents in Ballot Battles: The History of Disputed Elections in the United States, post-election disputes have brought state and federal government to a political precipice numerous times in our history. A comprehensive, transparent, and fair arbitration process could well save us from another.
Gender And The Structural Constitution, 2016 University of Maryland School of Law
Gender And The Structural Constitution, Paula A. Monopoli
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
First Amendment Freeze Play: Bennett'S Strategy For Entrenching Inequality, 2016 University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law
First Amendment Freeze Play: Bennett'S Strategy For Entrenching Inequality, Frank A. Pasquale
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Quick And Dirty: The New Misreading Of The Voting Rights Act, 2016 Loyola Law School, Los Angeles
Quick And Dirty: The New Misreading Of The Voting Rights Act, Justin Levitt
Florida State University Law Review
The role of race in the apportionment of political power is one of the thorniest problems at the heart of American democracy, and reappears with dogged consistency on the docket of the Supreme Court. Most recently, the Court resolved a case from Alabama involving the Voting Rights Act and the appropriate use of race in redistricting. But though the Court correctly decided the narrow issue before it, the litigation posture of the case hid the fact that Alabama is part of a disturbing pattern. Jurisdictions like Alabama have been applying not the Voting Rights Act, but a ham-handed cartoon of …
Making Corporate Law More Communitarian: A Proposed Response To The Roberts Court's Personification Of Corporations, 2016 Brooklyn Law School
Making Corporate Law More Communitarian: A Proposed Response To The Roberts Court's Personification Of Corporations, Robert M. Ackerman, Lance Cole
Brooklyn Law Review
Both Citizens United and Hobby Lobby are notable for the Roberts Court’s personification of the corporation. In Citizens United, the United States Supreme Court expanded corporate speech rights in a political context; in Hobby Lobby, it accorded religious rights to corporations in an unprecedented manner. This article explains how the Court’s expansion of corporate personification has ignored both traditional corporate law doctrine regarding shareholder primacy and the fundamental distinction in corporate law between the corporate entity and the shareholders who control it.
The article takes a communitarian approach to corporate law analysis, recognizing that corporations play useful roles …
A "Checklist Manifesto" For Election Day: How To Prevent Mistakes At The Polls, 2016 University of Kentucky College of Law
A "Checklist Manifesto" For Election Day: How To Prevent Mistakes At The Polls, Joshua A. Douglas
Florida State University Law Review
Mistakes happen—especially at the polls on Election Day. To fix this complex problem inherent in election administration, this Article proposes the use of simple checklists. Errors occur in every election, yet many of them are avoidable. Poll workers should have easy-to-use tools to help them on Election Day as they handle throngs of voters. Checklists can assist poll workers in pausing during a complex process to avoid errors. This is a simple idea with a big payoff: fewer lost votes, shorter lines at the polls, a reduction in post-election litigation, and smoother election administration. Further, unlike many other suggested election …
The Nineteenth Amendment Enforcement Power (But First, Which One Is The Nineteenth Amendment, Again?), 2016 Florida State University College of Law
The Nineteenth Amendment Enforcement Power (But First, Which One Is The Nineteenth Amendment, Again?), Steve Kolbert
Florida State University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Electing Justice Roush To The Supreme Court Of Virginia, 2016 University of Richmond
Electing Justice Roush To The Supreme Court Of Virginia, Carl W. Tobias
Law Faculty Publications
In late April 2015, the Supreme Court of Virginia announced that Justice LeRoy F. Millette, Jr. would retire on July 31, 2015. Democratic Governor Terry McAuliffe expeditiously created an open process for tapping a worthy successor. At July’s conclusion, the Governor appointed Fairfax County Circuit Judge Jane Marum Roush, an experienced, consensus jurist. On a Sunday night, merely two days after Roush swore her oath of office, Republican General Assembly leaders proclaimed their caucuses’ intention to elect another individual, despite conceding that Roush was very qualified. During the August special session, this concerted GOP endeavor prompted a Republican senator to …