Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Arts and Humanities (13)
- Philosophy (13)
- Jurisprudence (11)
- Legal Studies (11)
- Criminal Law (10)
-
- Criminal Procedure (8)
- Ethics and Political Philosophy (8)
- Legal Theory (8)
- Criminology and Criminal Justice (7)
- Law and Psychology (6)
- Sociology (6)
- Law and Society (5)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (5)
- Law and Philosophy (4)
- Political Science (4)
- Torts (4)
- Criminology (3)
- Legal History (3)
- Political Theory (3)
- Social Control, Law, Crime, and Deviance (3)
- Behavior and Behavior Mechanisms (2)
- Business (2)
- Common Law (2)
- Health Policy (2)
- Insurance (2)
- Insurance Law (2)
- Keyword
-
- Jurisprudence (3)
- Torts (3)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (2)
- Intellectual Property Law (2)
- Law and Technology (2)
-
- Legal Philosophy (2)
- Punishment (2)
- Risk (2)
- Addiction (1)
- Alcoholism (1)
- Causal theory of excuse (1)
- Choice (1)
- Civil Law (1)
- Clinton (1)
- Compulsion (1)
- Copyright (1)
- Criminal law (1)
- Criminalization (1)
- Culpability (1)
- Determinism (1)
- Disease (1)
- Duress (1)
- Eighth Amendment (1)
- Free will (1)
- Insurance Law (1)
- Intoxication (1)
- Law and History (1)
- Law and Philosophy/Jurisprudence (1)
- Law and Social Sciences (1)
- Liability Insurance (1)
Articles 1 - 16 of 16
Full-Text Articles in Theory and Philosophy
Addiction, Choice And Criminal Law, Stephen J. Morse
Addiction, Choice And Criminal Law, Stephen J. Morse
All Faculty Scholarship
This chapter is a contribution to a volume, Addiction and Choice, edited by Nick Heather and Gabriel Segal that is forthcoming from Oxford University Press. Some claim that addiction is a chronic and relapsing brain disease; others claim that it is a product of choice; yet others think that addictions have both disease and choice aspects. Which of these views holds sway in a particular domain enormously influences how that domain treats addictions. With limited exceptions, Anglo-American criminal law has implicitly adopted the choice model and a corresponding approach to responsibility. Addiction is irrelevant to the criteria for the …
Modest Retributivism, Mitchell N. Berman
Modest Retributivism, Mitchell N. Berman
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Alexander's Genius, Mitchell N. Berman
Rehabilitating Retributivism, Mitchell N. Berman
Rehabilitating Retributivism, Mitchell N. Berman
All Faculty Scholarship
This review essay of Victor Tadros’s new book, ‘‘The Ends of Harm: The Moral Foundations of Criminal Law,’’ responds to Tadros’s energetic and sophisticated attacks on retributivist justifications for criminal punishment. I argue, in a nutshell, that those attacks fail. In defending retributivism, however, I also sketch original views on two questions that retributivism must address but that many or most retributivists have skated past. First, what do wrongdoers deserve – to suffer? to be punished? something else? Second, what does it mean for them to deserve it? That is, what is the normative force or significance of valid desert …
A Good Enough Reason: Addiction, Agency And Criminal Responsibility, Stephen J. Morse
A Good Enough Reason: Addiction, Agency And Criminal Responsibility, Stephen J. Morse
All Faculty Scholarship
The article begins by contrasting medical and moral views of addiction and how such views influence responsibility and policy analysis. It suggests that since addiction always involves action and action can always be morally evaluated, we must independently decide whether addicts do not meet responsibility criteria rather than begging the question and deciding by the label of ‘disease’ or ‘moral weakness’. It then turns to the criteria for criminal responsibility and shows that the criteria for criminal responsibility, like the criteria for addiction, are all folk psychological. Therefore, any scientific information about addiction must be ‘translated’ into the law’s folk …
The Obligatory Structure Of Copyright Law: Unbundling The Wrong Of Copying, Shyamkrishna Balganesh
The Obligatory Structure Of Copyright Law: Unbundling The Wrong Of Copying, Shyamkrishna Balganesh
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Provocation As Partial Justification And Partial Excuse, Mitchell N. Berman
Provocation As Partial Justification And Partial Excuse, Mitchell N. Berman
All Faculty Scholarship
The partial defense of provocation provides that a person who kills in the heat of passion brought on by legally adequate provocation is guilty of manslaughter rather than murder. It traces back to the twelfth century, and exists today, in some form, in almost every U.S. state and other common law jurisdictions. But long history and wide application have not produced agreement on the rationale for the doctrine. To the contrary, the search for a coherent and satisfying rationale remains among the main occupations of criminal law theorists. The dominant scholarly view holds that provocation is best explained and defended …
The Myth Of The Fully Informed Rational Actor, Stephanos Bibas
The Myth Of The Fully Informed Rational Actor, Stephanos Bibas
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Foreseeability And Copyright Incentives, Shyamkrishna Balganesh
Foreseeability And Copyright Incentives, Shyamkrishna Balganesh
All Faculty Scholarship
Copyright law’s principal justification today is the economic theory of creator incentives. Central to this theory is the recognition that while copyright’s exclusive rights framework provides creators with an economic incentive to create, it also entails large social costs, and that creators therefore need to be given just enough incentive to create in order to balance the system’s benefits against its costs. Yet, none of copyright’s current doctrines enable courts to circumscribe a creator’s entitlement by reference to limitations inherent in the very idea of incentives. While the common law too relies on providing actors with incentives to behave in …
The Virtues Of Uncertainty In Law: An Experimental Approach, Tom Baker, Alon Harel, Tamar Kugler
The Virtues Of Uncertainty In Law: An Experimental Approach, Tom Baker, Alon Harel, Tamar Kugler
All Faculty Scholarship
Predictability in civil and criminal sanctions is generally understood as desirable. Conversely, unpredictability is condemned as a violation of the rule of law. This paper explores predictability in sanctioning from the point of view of efficiency. It is argued that, given a constant expected sanction, deterrence is increased when either the size of the sanction or the probability that it will be imposed is uncertain. This conclusion follows from earlier findings in behavioral decision research and the results of an experiment conducted specifically to examine this hypothesis. The findings suggest that, within an efficiency framework, there are virtues to uncertainty …
The Inefficiency Of Mens Rea, Claire Oakes Finkelstein
The Inefficiency Of Mens Rea, Claire Oakes Finkelstein
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Lying To Protect Privacy, Anita L. Allen
Lying To Protect Privacy, Anita L. Allen
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Social Contract Theory In American Case Law, Anita L. Allen
Social Contract Theory In American Case Law, Anita L. Allen
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Evidentiary Theory Of Blackmail: Taking Motives Seriously, Mitchell N. Berman
The Evidentiary Theory Of Blackmail: Taking Motives Seriously, Mitchell N. Berman
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Against Nature: On Robert Wright's The Moral Animal, Amy L. Wax
Against Nature: On Robert Wright's The Moral Animal, Amy L. Wax
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
On The Genealogy Of Moral Hazard, Tom Baker
On The Genealogy Of Moral Hazard, Tom Baker
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.