Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Chief executive officers (1)
- Cost-benefit analysis (1)
- Economic reform (1)
- Federal Account for Investor Restitution Fund (1)
- Financial compensation (1)
-
- Financial regulations (1)
- Financial scandals (1)
- Global Financial Crisis 2008-2009 (1)
- Judicial oversight (1)
- Risk management in business (1)
- SEC rulemaking (1)
- SEC rules (1)
- Securities and Exchange Commission (1)
- South Korea (1)
- Standard & Poor's 500 Index (1)
- Stock ownership -- Government policy (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Securities Law
Enhancing The Compensatory Roles Of Financial Regulatory Agencies In South Korea: Lessons From The U.S. Sec's Fair Fund, Daeil Kim
Maurer Theses and Dissertations
Recent financial scandals in South Korea that caused massive harms to financial consumers instigated voices that financial regulators should play a more active role in recompensing victims for losses incurred by misconduct in the financial market. In this regard, this thesis aims to suggest several considerations in developing the compensation scheme for injured financial consumers in Korea. This thesis first reviews the Federal Account for Investor Restitution (FAIR) Fund operated by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Specifically, it broadly addresses the history, overall process, operation, and major issues related to the FAIR Fund. Based on the FAIR Fund review, …
Ceo Stock Ownership Policies: Rhetoric And Reality, Nitzan Shilon
Ceo Stock Ownership Policies: Rhetoric And Reality, Nitzan Shilon
Indiana Law Journal
This Article is the first academic endeavor to analyze the efficacy and transparency of stock ownership policies (SOPs) in U.S. public firms. SOPs generally require managers to hold some of their firms’ stock for the long term. Following the 2008 financial crisis, firms universally adopted these policies and cited them more than any other policy as a key element in their mitigation of risk. However, my analysis of the recent SOPs of S&P 500 CEOs disputes what firms claim about these policies. First, I find that SOPs are extremely ineffectual in making CEOs hold on to their firm’s stock; this …
The Costs Of Mandatory Cost-Benefit Analysis In Sec Rulemaking, Donna M. Nagy
The Costs Of Mandatory Cost-Benefit Analysis In Sec Rulemaking, Donna M. Nagy
Articles by Maurer Faculty
Cost-benefit analysis can be a valuable tool when deployed at the Securities and Exchange Commission's discretion to improve its rulemaking process and the overall quality of SEC rules. However, when a cost-benefit analysis obligation is imposed externally whether from an explicit statutory command or from a de facto requirement enforced through judicial review-the costs of that mandatory cost-benefit analysis can be quite substantial. This Article identifies and explores the qualitative costs that that have already been incurred, and are bound to continue, if the adequacy of the SEC's cost-benefit analysis remains subject to extensive judicial scrutiny. These costs will only …