Securities Law Commons^™

10th Biennial Midwest/Midsouth Securities Law Conference, Office Of Continuing Legal Education At The University Of Kentucky College Of Law

Continuing Legal Education Materials

Materials from the UK/CLE 10th Biennial Midwest/Midsouth Securities Law Conference held in February 2000.

Indirect Causation: A Reminder From The Biblical Goring Ox Rule For Fraud On The Market Securities Litigation, Andrew R. Simmonds

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

"Bright Line," "Substantial Participation," Or Something Else: Who Is A Primary Violator Under Rule 10b-5?, Rodney D. Chrisman

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The Overwhelming Case For Elimination Of The Integration Doctrine Under The Securities Act Of 1933, Rutheford B. Campbell Jr.

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Blue Sky Laws And The Recent Congressional Preemption Failure, Rutheford B. Campbell Jr.

Law Faculty Scholarly Articles

Laws regarding the sale of securities may be understood as responses to perceived bargaining failures. The most extreme examples of these bargaining failures are seen in instances in which investors are intentionally misled or defrauded regarding the quality of the investments they receive for their money. Even without the presence of such culpability, however, bargaining failures are likely anytime the trading parties lack sufficient, accurate information necessary to effect value-enhancing trades. When that occurs in trades for capital, the parties to the transaction are misinformed respecting the trade, expectations are not protected, and that precious commodity, capital, may be turned …

Resales Of Securities Under The Securities Act Of 1933, Rutheford B. Campbell Jr.

Law Faculty Scholarly Articles

This Article explains the failings of the Securities and Exchange Commission in dealing with resales of securities and suggests an appropriate statutory and policy framework for a principled approach to the matter. Part I of this article is an introduction to this issue. Part II of this Article describes the present situation regarding the law of resales. Part III of this Article offers a series of broad observations about resales under the 1933 Act, suggests an economic analysis for the registration provisions of the 1933 Act, and presents some more specific recommendations concerning resale rules.

Defining Suitability, Seth C. Anderson, Donald Arthur Winslow

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Dealing With Anomalies, Confusion And Contradiction In Fraud On The Market Securities Class Actions, Andrew R. Simmonds, Kenneth A. Sagat, Joshua Ronen

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

From "Shoeless" Joe Jackson To Ivan Boesky: A Sporting Response To Law And Economics Criticism Of The Regulation Of Insider Trading, Donald Arthur Winslow, Seth C. Anderson

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Ernst & Ernst V. Hochfelder As Applied To Commodities Fraud: No Intent Required, Harry B. Borders

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Basic Inc. V. Levinson: The Supreme Court's Analysis Of Fraud On The Market And Its Impact On The Reliance Requirement Of Sec Rule 10b-5, R. Douglas Martin

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

7th Annual Seminar On Securities Law, Office Of Continuing Legal Education At The University Of Kentucky College Of Law, H. Alexander Campbell, Rutheford B. Campbell Jr., Ivan M. Diamond, Fredrich H. Thomforde, Frederic H. Davis, Cynthia W. Young, C. Craig Bradley Jr, David W. Harper, Gary L. Stage, Garrison R. Cox

Continuing Legal Education Materials

Materials from the UK/CLE 7th Annual Seminar on Securities Law held February 12-13, 1988.

Cts Corp. V. Dynamics Corp. Of America: Of State Regulation, Tender Offers, And Necromancy, Brian S. West

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The Market For Markets: Development Of International Securities And Commodities Trading, Charles C. Cox, Douglas C. Michael

Law Faculty Scholarly Articles

International Linkage of securities exchanges is an idea unheard of not long ago, but whose time has come quickly. Since 1984, five different links have been created between United States securities or commodities exchanges and counterparts abroad. Three other links have been proposed, and several more are being informally discussed. At the same time, financial firms are investing in in-house international trading technology. The exchanges are battling the development of these in-house trading links for the expanding business in international securities and commodities trading, attempting to persuade traders to use linked markets rather than their own internal connections. “Each exchange …

Seminar On Securities Law, Office Of Continuing Legal Education At The University Of Kentucky College Of Law, James A. Kegley, H. Alexander Campbell, Gary L. Stage, Ralston W. Steenrod, James C. Strode, Robert P. Ross, Gerald R. Martin, C. Christopher Trower, Willburt D. Ham, Ronda S. Paul, Rodger A. Marting, Oscar N. Persons, Francesca Marciniak, O. Wayne Davis, Rutheford B. Campbell Jr.

Continuing Legal Education Materials

Materials from the UK/CLE Seminar on Securities Law held February 14-15, 1986.

Racing Syndicates As Securities, Rutheford B. Campbell Jr.

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Horse Syndicates As Securities Under Blue Sky Laws, John Coleman Ayers

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Kefalas V. Bonnie Brae Farms: A Practical Approach To Thoroughbred Breeding Syndications And Securities Laws, Timothy Nicholas Sweeney

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Racing Syndicates As Securities, Rutheford B. Campbell Jr.

Law Faculty Scholarly Articles

It is not difficult to understand why horses like Devil's Bag, Chief's Crown and Spend A Buck are syndicated during their racing careers. The owners of such horses find themselves with an asset worth millions of dollars, but the asset has the potential to decrease significantly in value if the racing fortunes of the horse change. That creates pressure for owners to disinvest, at least partially, and spread the risk of loss. Investors, on the other hand, are often just as anxious to invest. Not only is there the chance of earnings and appreciation if the horse continues to win, …

An Open Attack On The Nonsense Of Blue Sky Regulation, Rutheford B. Campbell Jr.

Law Faculty Scholarly Articles

The evolution of state securities laws (hereinafter "blue sky laws") in this country is a classic example of regulation that was, perhaps, initially justified and that was apparently promulgated with the best of motives, but which now is actually harmful to society. Today, blue sky laws are ineffective, philosophically unsound, and unnecessarily expensive, and they should be substantially eliminated. Because of the vested interests that have developed, however, it is unlikely that states will respond to this problem, and it will probably take action by the United States Congress to preempt the area. Such an action is appropriate and, indeed, …

The Plight Of Small Issuers (And Others) Under Regulation D: Those Nagging Problems That Need Attention, Rutheford B. Campbell Jr.

Law Faculty Scholarly Articles

Regulation D traces its roots to section 4(2) and section 3(b) of the Securities Act of 1933. Both of these sections are designed to relieve an issuer from the pains of registration under the 1933 Act in situations where Congress deemed such registration inappropriate. Therefore, under section 4(2), no registration is required for "transactions by an issuer not involving any public offering." Section 3(b) is not a self-executing exemption but instead permits the Securities and Exchange Commission to enact rules and regulations exempting issuers from registration requirements "if it finds that ... [registration] is not necessary in the public interest …

The Draft Restatement: A Critique From A Securities Regulation Perspective, Douglas C. Michael, Daniel L. Goelzer, Jacob H. Stillman, Elisse B. Walter, Anne H. Sullivan

Law Faculty Scholarly Articles

For the past several years, the American Law Institute has been preparing a proposed revision of the Restatement (Second) of the Foreign Relations Law of the United States (“Draft Restatement”). This article is a critique from a securities regulation perspective of the Draft Restatement's sections 402, 403, 416, 418, 419, 420 and 431.1 In short, the Draft Restatement departs substantially from existing law. It would add dangerous vagueness and uncertainty to the jurisdictional analysis used to determine whether the United States securities laws will be applied to transnational securities activities. In particular, the complicated balancing inquiry required under the Draft …

The Plight Of Small Issuers (And Others) Under Regulation D: Those Nagging Problems That Need Attention, Rutheford B. Campbell Jr.

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Security Interests In Thoroughbred And Standardbred Horses: A Transactional Approach, R. David Lester

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Stallion Syndicates As Securities, Rutheford B. Campbell Jr.

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Stallion Syndicates As Securities, Rutheford B. Campbell Jr.

Law Faculty Scholarly Articles

To people outside the horse business, the word “syndicate” may conjure up images of sinister characters and organized crime. People who invest in horses, however, attach quite a different meaning to the word syndicates. Mention of a syndicate may remind them of Secretariat, Niatross, Aladdinn or Easy Jet, depending upon the particular breed of horse that interests them. They also think of something else: money, big money.

Although one cannot seriously contend that syndicates alone are responsible for the spectacular monetary growth of the horse business, they certainly have facilitated that growth. Syndicates have been and continue to be the …

Voluntary Recapitalization, Fairness, And Rule 10b-5: Life Along The Trail Of Santa Fe, Rutheford B. Campbell Jr.

Law Faculty Scholarly Articles

In corporate recapitalizations, the board of directors will sometimes propose a recapitalization plan which substantially alters the “bundle of rights” represented by preferred shares. Although these plans cannot usually be completed without the approval of a majority of the preferred shareholders, the preferred shareholders are at a disadvantage to protect their interests for several reasons. Thus preferred shareholders who are dissatisfied with the change in their rights will sometimes call upon state courts to enjoin the recapitalization on the grounds that it is unfair or fraudulent; state courts, however, have provided only slight protection for preferred shareholders. In this article, …

The Plight Of Small Issuers Under The Securities Act Of 1933: Practical Foreclosure From The Capital Market, Rutheford B. Campbell Jr.

Law Faculty Scholarly Articles

The thesis of this Article is simple: the Securities Act of 1933 does not work very well for small issuers, a premise which the Securities and Exchange Commission appeared to tacitly recognize in a series of announcements released early this year. Because of a combination of exorbitant costs, unmanageable levels of ambiguity, unworkable resale provisions and contamination caused by prior illegal sales of stock, a small issuer often is unable to comply with the 1933 Act. As a result it may be difficult or even impossible for a small issuer to raise capital by selling stock.

There are obvious pernicious …

Security Interests In Motor Vehicles: A Conflict In Kentucky Law, Henry Lawson

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Definition Of Control In Secondary Distributions, Rutheford B. Campbell Jr.

Law Faculty Scholarly Articles

Section 2(11) of the Securities Act of 1933 (Act) generally subjects the sale of securities by a person "controlling an issuer" to the same rules that govern the sale of securities by an issuer. Accordingly, before a "control" person may sell the securities he holds in the controlled corporation he must either register them with the Securities and Exchange Commission (Commission) or qualify for an exemption from the registration requirement. While the Act clearly requires that a "control" person either register or qualify for an exemption, it fails to define "control." Thus, the task of defining has fallen to the …