Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Securities Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 16 of 16

Full-Text Articles in Securities Law

The Judicial Application Of The Causation Test Of The False Statement Doctrine In Securities Litigation In China, Ling Dai Sep 2006

The Judicial Application Of The Causation Test Of The False Statement Doctrine In Securities Litigation In China, Ling Dai

Washington International Law Journal

As part of the reform of China’s centrally planned economy, one of the primary purposes in establishing a stock market was to help state-owned enterprises raise sufficient capital from the public. The protection of investors’ interests was not essential in the initial contemplation of securities laws, though the listed companies have a duty of disclosure under the 1998 Securities Law. After the Supreme People’s Court promulgated its judicial interpretation of the false statement doctrine in civil securities cases in 2002, the lower courts started to interpret and apply the elements of the false statement doctrine in securities cases brought by …


Caught Between A Rock And A Soft Place: Regulating Legal Ethics To Police Corporate Governance In The United States And Hong Kong, Susan E. Carroll Jan 2005

Caught Between A Rock And A Soft Place: Regulating Legal Ethics To Police Corporate Governance In The United States And Hong Kong, Susan E. Carroll

Washington International Law Journal

Both the United States and Hong Kong have suffered through corporate governance scandals in recent years. The two nations have tried different methods of regulating legal ethics in order to curtail future corporate governance scandals. The United States, via the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, empowered the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") to dictate disclosure requirements to U.S. lawyers who represent listed corporations. This mandate creates conflicts between lawyers' duty to keep clients' secrets and their duty to disclose client information for the protection of public interests. Hong Kong took a completely different approach. The Hong Kong Stock Exchange negotiated the …


Securities Supervision And Judicial Review [In China], Zhongle Zhan, Fengying Li, Inseon Paik Apr 2004

Securities Supervision And Judicial Review [In China], Zhongle Zhan, Fengying Li, Inseon Paik

Washington International Law Journal

Since its founding in 1992, the China Securities Regulatory Commission ("CSRC") has, by the design of the central government of China, become the primary regulator of the Chinese securities market. The CSRC has, however, made some controversial decisions in enforcing its securities regulations. In particular, this article addresses the legal implications of the CSRC's failure to comply with controlling securities regulations in rejecting the Hainan Kaili Central Construction Company's listing application and the ramifications of such selective regulatory enforcement. The article provides an analysis of the current relationship between Chinese administrative and securities law.


Recent Intensification Of Investor Protection In The Korean Securities Market: The Mandatory And Fair Disclosure Systems, Kwang-Rok Kim May 2003

Recent Intensification Of Investor Protection In The Korean Securities Market: The Mandatory And Fair Disclosure Systems, Kwang-Rok Kim

Washington International Law Journal

This Article analyzes the Korean fair disclosure system and the Korean mandatory disclosure system under the Korean Securities and Exchange Act ("KSEA"). After the turbulence in the financial markets resulting from the economic crises of late 1997, the South Korean government realized that the Korean economy had failed to keep pace with the world economy. The Korean economy underwent many changes after being offered financial relief from the International Monetary Fund. As part of these changes, the government adopted a series of structural reform measures to improve the standard of corporate governance and enhance corporate management. The KSEA now provides …


Private Enforcement Of Securities Fraud Law In China: A Critique Of The Supreme People's Court 2003 Provisions Concerning Private Securities Litigation, Guiping Lu May 2003

Private Enforcement Of Securities Fraud Law In China: A Critique Of The Supreme People's Court 2003 Provisions Concerning Private Securities Litigation, Guiping Lu

Washington International Law Journal

On January 9, 2003, China's Supreme People's Court issued a new ruling with detailed provisions governing private securities litigation involving disclosure of false or misleading information. The new ruling is expected to play an important role in regulating and developing China's securities markets by providing a necessary judicial safeguard against infringement upon investors' interests. The new ruling, however, is unlikely to achieve its expected effect due to various procedural and substantive hurdles to investor access to judicial recourse. The built-in procedural hurdles either make it very difficult for securities investors to bring private actions, or, in some circumstances, deprive them …


The Tender Offer In Korea: An Analytic Comparison Between Korea And The United States, Kwang-Rok Kim May 2001

The Tender Offer In Korea: An Analytic Comparison Between Korea And The United States, Kwang-Rok Kim

Washington International Law Journal

Even though the tender offer system in Korea was established in 1976, there were very few tender offer transactions until 1997. However, after Korea's economic crisis in late 1997, the Korean government not only took a series of structural reform measures to improve the securities market system, but also widely opened the financial markets to foreign countries by abolishing or amending restrictions on foreign investment. The 1998 reforms to the Korea Securities Exchange Act included significant changes to tender offer regulations, making hostile takeovers more feasible. Since that time, the tender offer has been used as a tool to acquire …


An Outsider's View Of China's Insider Trading Law, Charles Zhen Qu Mar 2001

An Outsider's View Of China's Insider Trading Law, Charles Zhen Qu

Washington International Law Journal

China's insider trading law can be found in the country's first unified securities industry law, Securities Law of the People's Republic of China, which came into force on July 1, 1999. The provisions of this law relating to insider trading, however, do not seem to help achieve the legislative purpose of the Securities Law, namely, to protect the interest of investors and promote the development of a socialist economy. The inadequacy of the current regime lies in the overly narrow definitions of "insider" and "inside information," the lack of workability of civil liability provisions, and the failure of China's Securities …


Law And Policy Of Securities Regulation In Korea, Sang-Hyun Song Jul 1995

Law And Policy Of Securities Regulation In Korea, Sang-Hyun Song

Washington International Law Journal

This Article describes the regulation of securities in Korea, exploring in detail the Securities Exchange Act of 1962. The current system of registration, disclosure, and enforcement is explained, with special attention given to the regulation of market professionals and of international securities offerings. This Article identifies areas in which the current Korean securities laws need improvement, and concludes that laws governing disclosure and international securities transactions must be improved if the Korean stock market is to continue to grow apace with the Korean economy.


Securities Regulation In Thailand: Laws And Policies, Pises Sethsathira Jul 1995

Securities Regulation In Thailand: Laws And Policies, Pises Sethsathira

Washington International Law Journal

This Article provides an overview of the new regulatory structure governing capital markets in Thailand as instituted by the Securities Exchange Act of 1992 ("SEA"). Special attention is given to the rules embodied in the SEA as they affect public offerings, fraud, securities businesses, and publicly held companies. The SEA introduces several new concepts to Thai regulation of securities, and these concepts are analyzed, to the extent they can be, given the lack of experience under the new Act.


Regulatory Mechanisms Of Securities Trading In Malaysia (With Special Reference To Insider Trading), Mohd. Ishaque Qureshi Jul 1995

Regulatory Mechanisms Of Securities Trading In Malaysia (With Special Reference To Insider Trading), Mohd. Ishaque Qureshi

Washington International Law Journal

In 1993, Malaysia established a Securities Commission to make the securities markets more secure and efficient, and to better control insider trading. This Article first presents an overview of the structure of the Securities Commission and the responsibilities of the various divisions and officers. Second, it reviews the common law and statutory law on which the Commission and other government agencies must rely to regulate the securities markets.


Regulation Of The Securities Industry In Singapore, Walter Woon Jul 1995

Regulation Of The Securities Industry In Singapore, Walter Woon

Washington International Law Journal

This Article focuses on the various legal regimes governing securities regulation in Singapore, with an emphasis on the various mechanisms for enforcing anti-insider trading laws and the disclosure requirements connected with those laws. The new regulations promulgated in the wake of the Pan-Electric scandal of 1986, which sent shock waves through the Singapore stock exchange, are much more stringent than the previous ones. The authorities of the Monetary Authority of Singapore, the Securities Industry Council, and the Stock Exchange of Singapore are discussed as they pertain to insider trading, false trading and market rigging, stock market manipulation, dissemination of false …


Rules On Disclosure And Enforcement In The Philippines, Eduardo De Los Angeles Jul 1995

Rules On Disclosure And Enforcement In The Philippines, Eduardo De Los Angeles

Washington International Law Journal

The Philippines modeled its first securities laws on the U.S. Uniform Sales of Securities Act, Securities Act of 1933, and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. In terms of disclosure requirements, the early Philippine laws were more lenient than the U.S. acts, but since 1982 the Philippines has improved its disclosure requirements by implementing its Revised Securities Act. The new Act imposes more consistent reporting rules on issuers and insiders, and levies a broad range of sanctions. Nonetheless, the Revised Securities Act could be improved further by requiring fuller disclosure during registration and by toughening the insider trading provisions. Also, …


Insider Trading By An Issuer Under Japanese Law, Misao Tatsuta Jul 1995

Insider Trading By An Issuer Under Japanese Law, Misao Tatsuta

Washington International Law Journal

This Article explores the impact of the 1994 amendments to the Commercial Code on the Japanese Securities and Exchange Law, especially as they pertain to insider trading by stock issuers. The Article identifies limited situations, both in tender offer and public stock market contexts, in which companies may purchase their own stocks. Specifically, the Article addresses the issuer's repurchase plan, the necessary elements of disclosure, and the penalties for non-disclosure. The Article analyzes the amendments and questions their effectiveness in addressing the problem of insider trading.


Regulation Of Canadian Capital Markets In The 1990s: The United States In The Driver's Seat, Cally Jordan Jul 1995

Regulation Of Canadian Capital Markets In The 1990s: The United States In The Driver's Seat, Cally Jordan

Washington International Law Journal

This Article looks at the regulatory techniques that have been adopted in a small but developed market, Canada, in response to the increasing integration of the North American economy and internationalization of capital markets. One of the most comprehensive experiments has been the Multijurisdictional Disclosure System (MJDS) implemented in Canada and the United States in 1991. Based on principles of reciprocal recognition, the MJDS has in fact created greater pressures for harmonization of the two regulatory regimes and, on the Canadian side, prompted regulatory innovations which have attempted to keep Canadian markets in the global game.


Gilding The Iron Rice Bowl: The Illusion Of Shareholder Rights In China, Matthew D. Latimer Oct 1994

Gilding The Iron Rice Bowl: The Illusion Of Shareholder Rights In China, Matthew D. Latimer

Washington Law Review

In the late 1970s, the People's Republic of China (P.R.C.) embarked upon a program of economic reform that has resulted in the issuance of equity securities in previously state-owned enterprises. with the recent advent of national stockmarkets, national securities legislation is emerging to supplement and further define prior local-level regulation. Despite these new laws, however, private investors still lack many of the protections enjoyed by investors in Western financial markets. This Comment examines these disparities and suggests that non-state investors in China's nascent financial markets still lack an effective means of overseeing the policy decisions of State-owned corporations and face …


Introduction To The Financial System And Securities & Exchange System Reform Act In Japan, Hiroshi Naka, Akio Nakamura, Atsushi Yamashita, Scott Siegler Jun 1993

Introduction To The Financial System And Securities & Exchange System Reform Act In Japan, Hiroshi Naka, Akio Nakamura, Atsushi Yamashita, Scott Siegler

Washington International Law Journal

This translation of an original Japanese language work, by Hiroshi Naka and Akio Nakamura, both of the Japanese Ministry of Finance, details the reforms of Japan's financial and securities & exchange system made under the recently enacted System Reform Act. The major reforms under the Act include: (1) altering the "Glass Steagall" rule (the separation of securities business and banking business) in Japan so that banks and securities companies can engage in each other's business through their subsidiaries; (2) extending securities regulations to some new types of structured finance; (3) amending public offering provisions and providing new articles for private …