Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Adjudications (1)
- Civil liability (1)
- Clinic students (1)
- Detention center (1)
- Federal courts (1)
-
- Initiative system (1)
- Initiatives (1)
- Judges (1)
- Juvenile court (1)
- Juvenile justice clinic (1)
- Law clerks (1)
- Lawyers (1)
- Legal research (1)
- Material fact (1)
- Oregon Securities Law (1)
- Oregon law (1)
- Paralegals (1)
- Plea hearings (1)
- Proficiency (1)
- Referendum (1)
- Representative governement (1)
- Republican government (1)
- Securities (1)
- Securities law (1)
- Statutory registration requirements (1)
- Students (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Other Law
The Written Contract As Safe Harbor For Dishonest Conduct, Lawrence Solan
The Written Contract As Safe Harbor For Dishonest Conduct, Lawrence Solan
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The William S. Boyd School Of Law Juvenile Justice Clinic, Mary E. Berkheiser
The William S. Boyd School Of Law Juvenile Justice Clinic, Mary E. Berkheiser
Scholarly Works
This article reviews the work of the Juvenile Justice Clinic at the William S. Boyd School of Law.
They Toil Not, Neither Do They Spin: Civil Liability Under The Oregon Securities Law, Keith A. Rowley
They Toil Not, Neither Do They Spin: Civil Liability Under The Oregon Securities Law, Keith A. Rowley
Scholarly Works
Under Oregon law, persons who sell securities in violation of statutory registration requirements, or by means of some misrepresentation or omission of material fact, may be liable to any person or entity who buys securities from or through them. Likewise, persons who buy securities by means of some misrepresentation or omission of material fact may be liable to any person or entity who sells securities to or through them. In addition to, or in lieu of, suing the person who committed the material misrepresentation or omission, a plaintiff may sue one or more persons or entities who might be vicariously …
Courts As Watchdogs Of The Washington State Initiative Process, Kenneth P. Miller
Courts As Watchdogs Of The Washington State Initiative Process, Kenneth P. Miller
Seattle University Law Review
This Article describes the high rate at which courts have invali- dated Washington initiatives and then explores why this is so. The Article suggests that it is initiative lawmaking's Populist orientation—with respect to both its unfiltered majoritarian processes and its often—constitutionally suspect substance-that makes initiatives vulnerable to legal attack.