Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Appalachia (1)
- Appalachian Law Reform (1)
- Critical Legal Research (1)
- Critical Legal Theory (1)
- Drilling oil and gas wells (1)
-
- Ecofeminism (1)
- Environmental Justice (1)
- Feminist Methodologies (1)
- Fracking (1)
- Gas wells (1)
- Intra-Systemic Law Reform (1)
- Landowners (1)
- Legal Analysis (1)
- Legal Research (1)
- Legal Research Pedagogy (1)
- Mountaintop Removal (1)
- Oil and gas extraction (1)
- Oil fields (1)
- Rule of capture (1)
- Social Ecology (1)
- Statutory pooling (1)
- Systemic Law Reform (1)
- Unitization (1)
- West virginia (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law
Statutory Pooling And Unitization In West Virginia: The Case For Protecting Private Landowners, James E. Mcdaniel
Statutory Pooling And Unitization In West Virginia: The Case For Protecting Private Landowners, James E. Mcdaniel
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Horizontal Drilling, Vertical Problems: Property Law Challenges From The Marcellus Shale Boom, 49 J. Marshall L. Rev. 413 (2015), Joshua Fershee, S. Alex Shay
Horizontal Drilling, Vertical Problems: Property Law Challenges From The Marcellus Shale Boom, 49 J. Marshall L. Rev. 413 (2015), Joshua Fershee, S. Alex Shay
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Fracking: The Unconventional Energy Response To Climate Change: Implications For The Real Estate Industry, 49 J. Marshall L. Rev. 449 (2015), Celeste Hammond
Fracking: The Unconventional Energy Response To Climate Change: Implications For The Real Estate Industry, 49 J. Marshall L. Rev. 449 (2015), Celeste Hammond
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Following New Lights: Critical Legal Research Strategies As A Spark For Law Reform In Appalachia, Nicholas F. Stump
Following New Lights: Critical Legal Research Strategies As A Spark For Law Reform In Appalachia, Nicholas F. Stump
American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law
The nascent “critical legal research” movement applies the constellation of critical theory to the American legal research regime. Work in this discourse has unpacked the means through which commercial print and online legal resources (e.g., Westlaw and Lexis) insidiously channel the efforts of legal researchers, essentially predetermining research outcomes. Although legal research is commonly conceived as a normatively neutral paradigm, such commercial homogenizing agents (paired with traditional methods of legal analysis) in fact reflect and perpetuate society’s dominant interests. As grounded in the existing literature, this Article outlines novel strategies that may together constitute one potential version of a critically …