Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Law and Philosophy (2)
- Arts and Humanities (1)
- Catholic Studies (1)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
-
- Courts (1)
- Criminal Law (1)
- Criminal Procedure (1)
- Fourteenth Amendment (1)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (1)
- Law and Race (1)
- Law and Society (1)
- Logic and Foundations of Mathematics (1)
- Natural Law (1)
- Other Philosophy (1)
- Philosophy (1)
- Religion (1)
- Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion (1)
- Institution
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Legal History
The Conceptions Of Self-Evidence In The Finnis Reconstruction Of Natural Law, Kevin P. Lee
The Conceptions Of Self-Evidence In The Finnis Reconstruction Of Natural Law, Kevin P. Lee
St. Mary's Law Journal
Finnis claims that his theory proceeds from seven basic principles of practical reason that are self-evidently true. While much has been written about the claim of self-evidence, this article considers it in relation to the rigorous claims of logic and mathematics. It argues that when considered in this light, Finnis equivocates in his use of the concept of self-evidence between the realist Thomistic conception and a purely formal, modern symbolic conception. Given his respect for the modern positivist separation of fact and value, the realism of the Thomistic conception cannot be the foundation for the natural law as Finnis would …
From Common Law To Constitution, Sanctioned Dispossession And Subjugation Through Otherization And Discriminatory Classification, Mobolaji Oladeji
From Common Law To Constitution, Sanctioned Dispossession And Subjugation Through Otherization And Discriminatory Classification, Mobolaji Oladeji
Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity
No abstract provided.
Motives And Fiduciary Loyalty, Stephen R. Galoob, Ethan J. Leib
Motives And Fiduciary Loyalty, Stephen R. Galoob, Ethan J. Leib
Faculty Scholarship
How, if at all, do motives matter to loyalty? We have argued that loyalty (and the duty of loyalty in fiduciary law) has a cognitive dimension. This kind of “cognitivist” account invites the counterargument that, because most commercial fiduciary relationships involve financial considerations, purity of motive cannot be central to loyalty in the fiduciary context. We contend that this counterargument depends on a flawed understanding of the significance of motive to loyalty. We defend a view of the importance of motivation to loyalty that we call the compatibility account. On this view, A acts loyally toward B only if …