Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- CADA (1)
- Civil Rights Act of 1964 (1)
- Civil rights (1)
- Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act (1)
- Commerce Clause (1)
-
- Common law (1)
- Constitution. 2nd Amendment (1)
- Constitutional history (1)
- Equal Protection Clause (1)
- Firearms--Law and legislation (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Fourteenth Amendment (1)
- Free Exercise Clause (1)
- Free exercise rights (1)
- Free speech (1)
- Gun control (1)
- Judicial reason (1)
- Judicial review (1)
- Judicial supremacy (1)
- LGBT rights (1)
- Modern constitutionalism (1)
- Popular authorship (1)
- Premodern politics (1)
- Present consent (1)
- Public accommodation law (1)
- Religious beliefs (1)
- Revolutionary generation (1)
- Same-sex marriage (1)
- South Africa (1)
- Transformative constitutionalism (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Legal History
From Parliamentary To Judicial Supremacy: Reflections In Honour Of The Constitutionalism Of Justice Moseneke, Peter G. Danchin
From Parliamentary To Judicial Supremacy: Reflections In Honour Of The Constitutionalism Of Justice Moseneke, Peter G. Danchin
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Contemplating Masterpiece Cakeshop, Terri R. Day
Contemplating Masterpiece Cakeshop, Terri R. Day
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Fear And Firearms, Darrell A. H. Miller
The Original Theory Of Constitutionalism, David Singh Grewal, Jedediah S. Purdy
The Original Theory Of Constitutionalism, David Singh Grewal, Jedediah S. Purdy
Faculty Scholarship
The conflict between various versions of “originalism” and “living constitutionalism” has defined the landscape of constitutional theory and practice for more than a generation, and it shows no sign of abating. Although each camp has developed a variety of methodological approaches and substantive distinctions, each one also returns to a core concern: the democratic authority of constitutional review. The late Justice Scalia crystallized the originalist concern in his dissent in Obergefell v. Hodges: “It is of overwhelming importance … who it is that rules me. Today’s decree says that my Ruler, and the Ruler of 320 million Americans coast-to-coast, …