Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Law and Economics (2)
- Social Choice Theory (2)
- Analytical Marxis (1)
- Antireductionism (1)
- Arrow Theorem (1)
-
- Bourgeoisie (1)
- Capitalism (1)
- Class interest (1)
- Classes (1)
- Collective entities (1)
- Collective irrationality (1)
- Condorcet cycling (1)
- Confirmation of scientific theory (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Democractic decisionmaking (1)
- Deology (1)
- Elimination (1)
- Evolutionary explanation (1)
- Functional explanation (1)
- G.A. Cohen (1)
- General Law (1)
- Impossibility Theorem (1)
- Interpersonal Comparison of Utilities (1)
- Jon Elster (1)
- Justice (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Legal History
Collective Choice, Justin Schwartz
Collective Choice, Justin Schwartz
Justin Schwartz
This short nontechnical article reviews the Arrow Impossibility Theorem and its implications for rational democratic decisionmaking. In the 1950s, economist Kenneth J. Arrow proved that no method for producing a unique social choice involving at least three choices and three actors could satisfy four seemingly obvious constraints that are practically constitutive of democratic decisionmaking. Any such method must violate such a constraint and risks leading to disturbingly irrational results such and Condorcet cycling. I explain the theorem in plain, nonmathematical language, and discuss the history, range, and prospects of avoiding what seems like a fundamental theoretical challenge to the possibility …
The Paradox Of Ideology, Justin Schwartz
The Paradox Of Ideology, Justin Schwartz
Justin Schwartz
A standard problem with the objectivity of social scientific theory in particular is that it is either self-referential, in which case it seems to undermine itself as ideology, or self-excepting, which seem pragmatically self-refuting. Using the example of Marx and his theory of ideology, I show how self-referential theories that include themselves in their scope of explanation can be objective. Ideology may be roughly defined as belief distorted by class interest. I show how Marx thought that natural science was informed by class interest but not therefore necessarily ideology. Capitalists have an interest in understanding the natural world (to a …
Functional Explanation And Metaphysical Individualism, Justin Schwartz
Functional Explanation And Metaphysical Individualism, Justin Schwartz
Justin Schwartz
A number of (present or former) analytical Marxists, such as Jon Elster, have argued that functional explanation has almost no place in the social sciences. (Although the discussion is framed in terms of a debate among analytical Marxists, the point is quite general, and Marxism is used for illustrative purposes.) Functional explanation accounts for what is to be explained by reference to its function; thus, sighted organism have eyes because eyes enable them to see. Elster and other critics of functional explanation argue that this pattern of explanation is inconsistent with "methodological individualism," the idea, as they understand it, that …