Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- 1860 (1)
- 1861 (1)
- 1863 (1)
- 1864 (1)
- Albert Pike (1)
-
- Amicus brief (1)
- Amicus curiae (1)
- Appellate advocacy (1)
- Appellate brief (1)
- Appellate discretion (1)
- Appellate process (1)
- Appellate review (1)
- Arkansas (1)
- Arkansas History (1)
- Arkansas Supreme Court (1)
- Arkansas law (1)
- Attorneys (1)
- Civil War (1)
- Collapse (1)
- Confederacy (1)
- Confederate congress (1)
- Confederate conscription act (1)
- Constitution of 1861 (1)
- Court (1)
- Court system (1)
- Elbert H. English (1)
- Elections (1)
- Freeman W. Compton (1)
- Hulbert F. Fairchild (1)
- Judge appointment (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Legal History
When Does The Curiae Need An Amicus?, Luther T. Munford
When Does The Curiae Need An Amicus?, Luther T. Munford
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
An argument is made for freely granting leave of amicus motions.
Discretionary Appellate Review Of Non-Final Orders: It’S Time To Change The Rules, Howard B. Eisenberg, Alan B. Morrison
Discretionary Appellate Review Of Non-Final Orders: It’S Time To Change The Rules, Howard B. Eisenberg, Alan B. Morrison
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
This article discusses the uncertainty of United States Courts of Appeals jurisdiction over non-final orders.
Unpublished Opinions: A Comment, Richard S. Arnold
Unpublished Opinions: A Comment, Richard S. Arnold
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
The Honorable Richard S. Arnold gives a federal appellate judge’s perspective of the unpublished opinions debate.
From Webster To Word-Processing: The Ascendance Of The Appellate Brief, William H. Rehnquist
From Webster To Word-Processing: The Ascendance Of The Appellate Brief, William H. Rehnquist
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
Chief Justice William Rehnquist analyzed the evolution of Supreme Court advocacy. The discussion begins with the initial preference for oral arguments and the influence of nineteenth century Supreme Court advocate Daniel Webster. The discussion then turns to the Court’s shift from more attention to oral argument to written briefs.
The Arkansas Supreme Court And The Civil War, L. Scott Stafford
The Arkansas Supreme Court And The Civil War, L. Scott Stafford
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.