Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- "inherently misleading" (1)
- "potentially misleading" (1)
- Advertise (1)
- Advertising Working Party (1)
- American Bar Association (1)
-
- American lawyers (1)
- Attorney advertising (1)
- Ban (1)
- Bar associations (1)
- Barratry (1)
- Barrister (1)
- Bates v. State Bar of Arizona (1)
- Boston Five (1)
- British (1)
- Canons of Professional Ethics (1)
- Champerty (1)
- Civil Rights (1)
- Civil rights (1)
- Commercial speech (1)
- Competition (1)
- Content controls (1)
- Disciplinary Rules (1)
- English Law Council Society (1)
- Ethical Considerations (1)
- Fee advertising rules (1)
- Format rules (1)
- Frequency limitation (1)
- Good taste requirement (1)
- In re RMJ (1)
- Law review (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Legal History
Solicitors' Right To Advertise: A Historical And Comparative Analysis, M. Catherine Harris
Solicitors' Right To Advertise: A Historical And Comparative Analysis, M. Catherine Harris
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
A Tale Of Prosecutorial Indiscretion: Ramsey Clark And The Selective Non-Prosecution Of Stokely Carmichael, Lonnie T. Brown
A Tale Of Prosecutorial Indiscretion: Ramsey Clark And The Selective Non-Prosecution Of Stokely Carmichael, Lonnie T. Brown
Scholarly Works
During the height of the Vietnam War and one of the most volatile periods of the civil rights movement, then-Attorney General Ramsey Clark controversially resisted intense political pressure to prosecute Black Power originator and antiwar activist Stokely Carmichael. Taken in isolation, this decision may seem courageous and praiseworthy, but when considered against the backdrop of Clark’s contemporaneous prosecution of an all-white group of similarly situated anti-draft leaders (the so-called Boston Five), his exercise of prosecutorial discretion becomes suspect. Specifically, the Boston Five were prosecuted in 1968 for conspiracy to aid and abet draft evasion, a charge for which the evidence …
Foreword: Why Open Access To Scholarship Matters, Joe Miller
Foreword: Why Open Access To Scholarship Matters, Joe Miller
Scholarly Works
On March 10, 2006, the Lewis & Clark Law Review sponsored a day-long symposium entitled Open Access Publishing and the Future of Legal Scholarship. That gathering led to eight papers that are forthcoming in Volume 10, Issue No. 4, of the Lewis & Clark Law Review. In this short Foreword, I offer some thoughts about why all law professors should take an interest in the movement promoting open access to scholarship. The principal reason, based in current circumstances, is the way that using an open access platform extends one's reach. The aspirational reason is that open access platforms enable us …