Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Fifth Amendment (2)
- History (2)
- Annual Survey of Virginia Law (1)
- Books Received (1)
- Coercion (1)
-
- Confessions (1)
- Constitutional Criminal Procedure (1)
- Crimes (1)
- Critical Legal Studies (1)
- Due process (1)
- Foreword (1)
- Human Rights Law (1)
- Index (1)
- Interrogation (1)
- Procedural rights (1)
- Religion (1)
- Silver Anniversary (1)
- Sixth Amendment (1)
- Trials (1)
- Voluntariness (1)
- Walder v. United States (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Legal History
Confessions, Criminals, And Community, Sheri Lynn Johnson
Confessions, Criminals, And Community, Sheri Lynn Johnson
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Legal Rape: The Marital Rape Exemption, 24 J. Marshall L. Rev. 393 (1991), Sandra L. Ryder, Sheryl A. Kuzmenka
Legal Rape: The Marital Rape Exemption, 24 J. Marshall L. Rev. 393 (1991), Sandra L. Ryder, Sheryl A. Kuzmenka
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Miracle, A Universe: Settling Accounts With Torturers, Juan E. Mendez
A Miracle, A Universe: Settling Accounts With Torturers, Juan E. Mendez
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
No abstract provided.
University Of Richmond Law Review
University Of Richmond Law Review
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Punishing Drug Addicts Who Have Babies: Women Of Color, Equality, And The Right Of Privacy, Dorothy E. Roberts
Punishing Drug Addicts Who Have Babies: Women Of Color, Equality, And The Right Of Privacy, Dorothy E. Roberts
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Impeachment Exception To The Exclusionary Rules: Policies, Principles, And Politics, The , James L. Kainen
Impeachment Exception To The Exclusionary Rules: Policies, Principles, And Politics, The , James L. Kainen
Faculty Scholarship
The exclusionary evidence rules derived from the Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments continue to play an important role in constitutional criminal procedure, despite the intense controversy that surrounds them. The primary justification for these rules has shifted from an "imperative of judicial integrity" to the "deterrence of police conduct that violates... [constitutional] rights." Regardless of the justification it uses for the rules' existence, the Supreme Court continues to limit their breadth "at the margin," when "the acknowledged costs to other values vital to a rational system of criminal justice" outweigh the deterrent effects of exclusion. The most notable limitation on …