Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law
- Keyword
-
- Criminal trial techniques; closing arguments; permissible argument; improper closing arguments; out-of-bounds argument; criminal trial closing arguments; personal attacks against opposing counsel; commenting on defendant's exercise of constitutional rights; expressing personal opinions in criminal closing argument; prejudicing the jury; asking jury to send a message to deter future crimes; convincing jurors to render verdict our of fear (1)
- Or community values protection; improper use of Golden Rule in closing argument; closing argument arguing facts outside the record; personal attacks on defendant; commenting on credibility of witnesses; invited response in closing argument; (1)
- Prosecutorial misconduct; proper scope of argument; limitations on closing argument; preservation of error for appellate review; appellate disposition of improper argument claims; (1)
- Vengeance (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility
Crossing The Line: Techniques Of Closing Argument That Are Out Of Bounds In Criminal Trials, Blake R. Mills
Crossing The Line: Techniques Of Closing Argument That Are Out Of Bounds In Criminal Trials, Blake R. Mills
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Prosecutorial Misconduct In Closing Argument In Arkansas Criminal Trials, J. Thomas Sullivan
Prosecutorial Misconduct In Closing Argument In Arkansas Criminal Trials, J. Thomas Sullivan
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.