Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Constitution (1)
- Civil Rights Removal Act (1)
- Warren Court (1)
- Judicial review (1)
- Injunctions (1)
-
- Facially void statute (1)
- Political expression (1)
- Remedies (1)
- Duality principle (1)
- Congress (1)
- Civil rights (1)
- Supremacy principle (1)
- Civil procedure (1)
- Equal access exception (1)
- African Americans (1)
- Federal removal (1)
- United States Supreme Court (1)
- Minorities (1)
- Powell v. McCormack (1)
- Race (1)
- Race and law (1)
- Racial equality (1)
- Judgments (1)
- Anti-suit injunction (1)
- Advance certainty test (1)
- State criminal prosecutions (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law and Race
Comment, Federal Removal And Injunction To Protect Political Expression And Racial Equality: A Proposed Change, Christopher B. Mueller
Comment, Federal Removal And Injunction To Protect Political Expression And Racial Equality: A Proposed Change, Christopher B. Mueller
Articles
No abstract provided.
Comment On Powell V. Mccormack, Terrance Sandalow
Comment On Powell V. Mccormack, Terrance Sandalow
Articles
The rapid pace of constitutional change during the past decade has blunted our capacity for surprise at Supreme Court decisions. Nevertheless, Powell v. McCormack is a surprising decision. Avoidance of politically explosive controversies was not one of the most notable characteristics of the Warren Court. And yet, it is one thing for the Court to do battle with the Congress in the service of important practical ends or when the necessity of doing so is thrust upon it by the need to discharge its traditional responsibilities. It is quite another to tilt at windmills, especially at a time when the ...