Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Affirmative action (3)
- Admissions (2)
- Colleges and universities (2)
- Diversity (2)
- Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin (2)
-
- Race and law (2)
- Affirmative Action (1)
- Anthony Kennedy (1)
- Bilingual education (1)
- Busing (1)
- Citizens United v. FEC (1)
- Class-based affirmative action (1)
- College admissions (1)
- Desegregation (1)
- Educational equity (1)
- Empirical research (1)
- Equal Protection (1)
- Fisher v. University of Texas (1)
- Grutter v. Bollinger (1)
- Intentional discrimination (1)
- Judicial interventions (1)
- Keyes (1)
- Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District Number One v. Holder (1)
- Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1 (1)
- Precedents (1)
- Preferences (1)
- Public Schools (1)
- Racial balance (1)
- Ricci v. DeStefano (1)
- Roberts Court (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 7 of 7
Full-Text Articles in Law and Race
Pimping Brown V. Board Of Education: The Destruction Of African-American Schools And The Mis-Education Of African-American Students, Irving Joyner
Pimping Brown V. Board Of Education: The Destruction Of African-American Schools And The Mis-Education Of African-American Students, Irving Joyner
North Carolina Central Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Thought Experiment: Brown V. Board Of Education Of Topeka, Kansas, Louis Michael Seidman
A Thought Experiment: Brown V. Board Of Education Of Topeka, Kansas, Louis Michael Seidman
The Modern American
No abstract provided.
Doing Affirmative Action, Stephen Clowney
Doing Affirmative Action, Stephen Clowney
Michigan Law Review First Impressions
Sometime this year the Supreme Court will announce its holding in Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin, a case that asks whether colleges may continue to consider race when making admissions decisions. Most Court watchers predict that the five conservative justices will vote to curtail the use of racial preferences. Lost in the weighty discussions about the scope of the Equal Protection Clause and the meaning of the Civil Rights struggle is any clear and concise explanation of how selective colleges actually make admissions decisions and how they work to fulfill the goals of affirmative action. This Essay seeks …
Affirmative Action, Justice Kennedy, And The Virtues Of The Middle Ground, Allen K. Rostron
Affirmative Action, Justice Kennedy, And The Virtues Of The Middle Ground, Allen K. Rostron
Faculty Works
When the Supreme Court hears arguments this fall about the constitutionality of affirmative action policies at the University of Texas, attention will be focused once again on Justice Anthony Kennedy. With the rest of the Court split between a bloc of four reliably liberal jurists and an equally solid cadre of four conservatives, the spotlight regularly falls on Kennedy, the swing voter that each side in every closely divided and ideologically charged case desperately hopes to attract. Critics condemn Kennedy for having an unprincipled, capricious, and self-aggrandizing style of decision-making. Though he is often decisive in the sense of casting …
Considering Class: College Access And Diversity, Matthew N. Gaertner, Melissa Hart
Considering Class: College Access And Diversity, Matthew N. Gaertner, Melissa Hart
Publications
Each time that the continued legality of race-conscious affirmative action is threatened, colleges and universities must confront the possibility of dramatically changing their admissions policies. Fisher v. University of Texas, which the Supreme Court will hear this year, presents just such a moment. In previous years when affirmative action has been outlawed by ballot initiative in specific states or when the Court has seemed poised to reject it entirely, there have been calls for replacing race-conscious admissions with class-based affirmative action. Supporters of race-conscious affirmative action have typically criticized the class-based alternative as ineffective at maintaining racial diversity. This …
Untoward Consequences: The Ironic Legacy Of Keyes V. School District No. 1, Rachel F. Moran
Untoward Consequences: The Ironic Legacy Of Keyes V. School District No. 1, Rachel F. Moran
Faculty Scholarship
The Keyes case began with high hopes that desegregation would lead to educational equity for black and Latino students in the Denver Public Schools. The lawsuit made history by successfully using circumstantial evidence to establish intentional discrimination and bring court-ordered busing to a school system outside the South. In the intervening years, that initial success became laden with irony. Because Denver was a tri-ethnic community of whites, blacks, and Latinos, the litigation revealed the complexities of pursuing reform in a school district not defined by a history of black-white relations.
The courts had to decide whether Latinos would count as …
Grutter's Denouement: Three Templates From The Roberts Court, Ellen D. Katz
Grutter's Denouement: Three Templates From The Roberts Court, Ellen D. Katz
Articles
Precedent from the Roberts Court shows the Justices taking three distinct approaches to precedent they dislike. Each provides a template for the Court to criticize race-based affirmative action in higher education, as Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin is widely expected to do. Most narrowly, the Court might use Fisher to issue a warning, much like it did in 2009 when it sidestepped a constitutional challenge to the Voting Rights Act; under this approach, the opinion would spell out why the Justices think the diversity celebrated in Grutter v. Bollinger no longer provides sufficient justification for the use of …