Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Keyword
-
- Constitution (2)
- Judicial (2)
- Administrative (1)
- Amendment (1)
- Authority (1)
-
- Checking (1)
- Coercion (1)
- Commission (1)
- Courts (1)
- Dictum (1)
- Due Process Clause (1)
- Due process (1)
- Elitism (1)
- Foundationalists (1)
- Influence (1)
- Inquiry (1)
- JIRC (1)
- Judges (1)
- Judicial activism (1)
- Judiciary (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Law (1)
- Lochner (1)
- Non-voluntary (1)
- Normativity (1)
- Policy (1)
- Politics (1)
- Popular sovereignty (1)
- Power (1)
- Review (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Jurisprudence
Guarding The Guardians: Judges' Rights And Virginia's Judicial Inquiry And Review Commission, Jeffrey D. Mcmahan Jr.
Guarding The Guardians: Judges' Rights And Virginia's Judicial Inquiry And Review Commission, Jeffrey D. Mcmahan Jr.
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Force Of Law: The Role Of Coercion In Legal Norms, Ekow N. Yankah
The Force Of Law: The Role Of Coercion In Legal Norms, Ekow N. Yankah
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Overcoming Lochner In The Twenty-First Century: Taking Both Rights And Popular Sovereignty Seriously As We Seek To Secure Equal Citizenship And Promote The Public Good, Thomas B. Mcaffee
Overcoming Lochner In The Twenty-First Century: Taking Both Rights And Popular Sovereignty Seriously As We Seek To Secure Equal Citizenship And Promote The Public Good, Thomas B. Mcaffee
University of Richmond Law Review
Professor McAffee reviews substantive due process as the textual basis for modern fundamental rights constitutional decision-making. He contends that we should avoid both the undue literalism that rejects the idea of implied rights, as well as the attempt to substitute someone's preferred moral vision for the limits, and compromises, that are implicit in and intended by the Constitution's text. He argues, moreover, that we can largely harmonizethe variousgoals of our constitutionalsystem by taking rights se- riously and by understanding that securing rights does not ex-haustthe Constitution'spurposes.
Friction By Design: The Necessary Contest Of State Judicial Power And Legislative Policymaking, Michael L. Buenger
Friction By Design: The Necessary Contest Of State Judicial Power And Legislative Policymaking, Michael L. Buenger
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.