Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Statutory interpretation (2)
- Congress (1)
- Constitution (1)
- Constitutional Federalism (1)
- First Principles (1)
-
- Founders (1)
- Hermeneutics (1)
- Judge Easterbrook (1)
- Judicial Review (1)
- Law school (1)
- Legal education (1)
- Legislation (1)
- Legislative history (1)
- Legislative intent (1)
- Matter of Sinclair (1)
- Pedagogy (1)
- Plain meaning rule (1)
- Pseudotexts (1)
- Purposive action (1)
- Searle (1)
- State v. Federal Government (1)
- Statutory construction (1)
- Supreme Court (1)
- Textual interpretation (1)
- The Construction of Social Reality (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 9 of 9
Full-Text Articles in Jurisprudence
Judicial Usurpation Of The F.T.C.'S Authority: A Return To The Rule Of Reason, 30 J. Marshall L. Rev. 283 (1996), Jeffrey H. Liebling
Judicial Usurpation Of The F.T.C.'S Authority: A Return To The Rule Of Reason, 30 J. Marshall L. Rev. 283 (1996), Jeffrey H. Liebling
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Death With Dignity: Aids And A Call For Legislation Securing The Right To Assisted Suicide, 29 J. Marshall L. Rev. 677 (1996), Jeremy A. Sitcoff
Death With Dignity: Aids And A Call For Legislation Securing The Right To Assisted Suicide, 29 J. Marshall L. Rev. 677 (1996), Jeremy A. Sitcoff
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Chaotic Pseudotext, Paul F. Campos
Tragic Irony Of American Federalism: National Sovereignty Versus State Sovereignty In Slavery And In Freedom, The Federalism In The 21st Century: Historical Perspectives, Robert J. Kaczorowski
Tragic Irony Of American Federalism: National Sovereignty Versus State Sovereignty In Slavery And In Freedom, The Federalism In The 21st Century: Historical Perspectives, Robert J. Kaczorowski
Faculty Scholarship
A plurality on the Supreme Court seeks to establish a state-sovereignty based theory of federalism that imposes sharp limitations on Congress's legislative powers. Using history as authority, they admonish a return to the constitutional "first principles" of the Founders. These "first principles," in their view, attribute all governmental authority to "the consent of the people of each individual state, not the consent of the undifferentiated people of the Nation as a whole." Because the people of each state are the source of all governmental power, they maintain, "where the Constitution is silent about the exercise of a particular power-that is, …
Work Of Knowledge , Abner S. Greene
Work Of Knowledge , Abner S. Greene
Faculty Scholarship
Interpretation involves the acquisition of knowledge. We are continually confronted with the results of purposive action. Sometimes these results are written texts, such as statutes or novels. Other times these results are events in the physical world, actions that we observe or the results of actions about which we are told. To make sense of these results of purposive action, that is, to make the results be more than just a jumble of sense impressions, the observer must find a way of organizing the material with which he or she is presented. These methods of organizing the results of purposive …
Establishing A Prima Facie Case Involving Multiple Chemical Sensitivity: A Threshhold Approach, 29 J. Marshall L. Rev. 441 (1996), Merilyn Brown
Establishing A Prima Facie Case Involving Multiple Chemical Sensitivity: A Threshhold Approach, 29 J. Marshall L. Rev. 441 (1996), Merilyn Brown
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Death Penalty And The Interstate Agreement On Detainers Act: A Proposal For Change, 29 J. Marshall L. Rev. 499 (1996), Edward G. Hild
The Death Penalty And The Interstate Agreement On Detainers Act: A Proposal For Change, 29 J. Marshall L. Rev. 499 (1996), Edward G. Hild
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Taking The Public Out Of Determining Government Policy: The Need For An Appropriate Scope Of Bargaining Test In The Illinois Public Sector, 29 J. Marshall L. Rev. 531 (1996), Eric C. Scheiner
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Conflicts And The Federal Circuit, 29 J. Marshall L. Rev. 835 (1996), Glenn L. Archer Jr.
Conflicts And The Federal Circuit, 29 J. Marshall L. Rev. 835 (1996), Glenn L. Archer Jr.
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.