Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- 1991) (7)
- Constitution (7)
- N.Y. Const. Art. I (7)
- State (7)
- Defendant (6)
-
- Federal (6)
- Trial (5)
- Criminal (4)
- Jury (4)
- Supreme Court (4)
- Appellate Division (3)
- Court (3)
- Court of Appeals (3)
- Evidence (3)
- Judge (3)
- Judges (3)
- Jurisprudence (3)
- New York (3)
- Police (3)
- Second Department (3)
- U.S. Const. Amend. VI (3)
- Violated (3)
- Violation (3)
- § 6 (3)
- Absence (2)
- Appeal (2)
- Appellate judges (2)
- Attorney (2)
- Challenge (2)
- Courtroom (2)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 17 of 17
Full-Text Articles in Jurisprudence
Judicial Federalism: Current Trends And Long-Term Prospects, Stanley H. Friedelbaum
Judicial Federalism: Current Trends And Long-Term Prospects, Stanley H. Friedelbaum
Florida State University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Remarks On The Process Of Judging, William H. Rehnquist
Remarks On The Process Of Judging, William H. Rehnquist
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Improving One's Situation: Some Pragmatic Reflections On The Art Of Judging, Catharine Pierce Wells
Improving One's Situation: Some Pragmatic Reflections On The Art Of Judging, Catharine Pierce Wells
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Book Review —Rewriting The History Of The Judiciary Act Of 1789: Exposing Myths,Challenging Premises And Using New Evidence, Roger J. Miner '56
Book Review —Rewriting The History Of The Judiciary Act Of 1789: Exposing Myths,Challenging Premises And Using New Evidence, Roger J. Miner '56
Book Reviews
No abstract provided.
Understanding Disagreement, The Root Issue Of Jurisprudence: Applying Wittgenstein To Positivism, Critical Theory, And Judging, Thomas Morawetz
Understanding Disagreement, The Root Issue Of Jurisprudence: Applying Wittgenstein To Positivism, Critical Theory, And Judging, Thomas Morawetz
Faculty Articles and Papers
No abstract provided.
Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel
Writing For Judges, Pierre Schlag
Abrams V. United States: Remembering The Authors Of Both Opinions, James F. Fagan Jr.
Abrams V. United States: Remembering The Authors Of Both Opinions, James F. Fagan Jr.
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Special Relationship Rule: Is It Consistent With The Waiver Of Sovereign Immunity? - A Study Of Kircher V. City Of Jamestown, Brian T. Cohen
The Special Relationship Rule: Is It Consistent With The Waiver Of Sovereign Immunity? - A Study Of Kircher V. City Of Jamestown, Brian T. Cohen
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Freedom Of Speech And The Press
Muncipal Law, Honorable Leon D. Lazer
Pre-Figuration And Evaluation, Pierre Schlag
Pre-Figuration And Evaluation, Pierre Schlag
Publications
In this response to Professor Rubin, Professor Schlag argues that a prescriptive theory of evaluation does not free an evaluator from the bias inherent in his own pre-figurations. On the contrary, the belief that better evaluative criteria will advance the cause of fairer evaluation is itself an effect of flawed and unrationalized pre-figurations of conventional legal thought. Professor Schlag argues that the evaluation question and its attendant disputes arise from a more significant development--the unraveling of the dominant paradigm of legal thought, the decomposition of normative legal thought.