Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Jurisprudence (2)
- Choice of Law (1)
- Economics (1)
- Egalitarianism (1)
- Equality (1)
-
- Fairness (1)
- Federal Conflicts (1)
- Federal Practice (1)
- General Law (1)
- Human Rights Law (1)
- Inequality (1)
- Justice (1)
- Labor Theory of Property (1)
- Law and Economics (1)
- Law and Society (1)
- Libertarianism (1)
- Locke (1)
- Model Code of Professional Responsibilit (1)
- Natural Rights (1)
- Nozick (1)
- Politics (1)
- Professional Conduct (1)
- Professional Ethics (1)
- Professional Standards and Responsibility (1)
- Property (1)
- Property Rights (1)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (1)
- Risk (1)
- Self-Ownership (1)
- Social Contract Theory (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Jurisprudence
Understanding Disagreement, The Root Issue Of Jurisprudence: Applying Wittgenstein To Positivism, Critical Theory, And Judging, Thomas Morawetz
Understanding Disagreement, The Root Issue Of Jurisprudence: Applying Wittgenstein To Positivism, Critical Theory, And Judging, Thomas Morawetz
Faculty Articles and Papers
No abstract provided.
From Libertarianism To Egalitarianism, Justin Schwartz
From Libertarianism To Egalitarianism, Justin Schwartz
Justin Schwartz
A standard natural rights argument for libertarianism is based on the labor theory of property: the idea that I own my self and my labor, and so if I "mix" my own labor with something previously unowned or to which I have a have a right, I come to own the thing with which I have mixed by labor. This initially intuitively attractive idea is at the basis of the theories of property and the role of government of John Locke and Robert Nozick. Locke saw and Nozick agreed that fairness to others requires a proviso: that I leave "enough …
Tort Law As A Comparative Institution, Claire Oakes Finkelstein
Tort Law As A Comparative Institution, Claire Oakes Finkelstein
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
State Ethical Codes And Federal Practice: Emerging Conflicts And Suggestions For Reform, Stephen B. Burbank
State Ethical Codes And Federal Practice: Emerging Conflicts And Suggestions For Reform, Stephen B. Burbank
All Faculty Scholarship
The standards for resolving putative conflicts between federal laws are not always clear, and neither for that matter is the standard for determining what constitutes a federal law capable of superseding effect. The technique of setting federal norms of professional conduct on a decentralized basis by borrowing or incorporating state norms is increasingly troublesome to the extent that the borrowed state norms are disuniform and that they are being put to multiple remedial purposes. Federal legislation preempting state law of professional conduct is conceivable but hardly likely, particularly as the norms are pressed into duty for purposes other than professional …