Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Jurisprudence Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 5 of 5

Full-Text Articles in Jurisprudence

The Jurisprudential Cab Ride: A Socratic Dialogue, Daniel A. Farber May 1992

The Jurisprudential Cab Ride: A Socratic Dialogue, Daniel A. Farber

BYU Law Review

No abstract provided.


Thinking Things, Not Words: Irvin Rutter's Pragmatic Jurisprudence Of Teaching, Gordon A. Christenson Jan 1992

Thinking Things, Not Words: Irvin Rutter's Pragmatic Jurisprudence Of Teaching, Gordon A. Christenson

Faculty Articles and Other Publications

Those of us in legal education and in the profession of law are in debt to the Law Review for publishing in this issue the last work of the late Professor Irvin Rutter, Law, Language, and Thinking Like a Lawyer.

On the occasion of Irvin Rutter's retirement in 1980, I briefly summarized these earlier contributions, locating them within the legal realist tradition, and we awaited the publication of his last work, then still in draft not quite satisfactory to Professor Rutter. In this essay, I situate his final work on teaching law in the pragmatist tradition with special emphasis on …


Fighting With Angry Women: A Response To Lasson, John A. Siliciano Jan 1992

Fighting With Angry Women: A Response To Lasson, John A. Siliciano

Cornell Law Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.


Writing For Judges, Pierre Schlag Jan 1992

Writing For Judges, Pierre Schlag

Publications

No abstract provided.


Pre-Figuration And Evaluation, Pierre Schlag Jan 1992

Pre-Figuration And Evaluation, Pierre Schlag

Publications

In this response to Professor Rubin, Professor Schlag argues that a prescriptive theory of evaluation does not free an evaluator from the bias inherent in his own pre-figurations. On the contrary, the belief that better evaluative criteria will advance the cause of fairer evaluation is itself an effect of flawed and unrationalized pre-figurations of conventional legal thought. Professor Schlag argues that the evaluation question and its attendant disputes arise from a more significant development--the unraveling of the dominant paradigm of legal thought, the decomposition of normative legal thought.