Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Discrimination (2)
- Brown v. Board of Education (1)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (1)
- Civil rights (1)
- College admissions (1)
-
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Constitutional law (1)
- Disparate-impact doctrine (1)
- Education (1)
- Education law (1)
- Equal protection (1)
- Equity (1)
- Exit (1)
- Federalism (1)
- Fourteenth Amendment (1)
- Judicial politics and ideology (1)
- Kymlicka (1)
- Labor & employment (1)
- Law and Society (1)
- Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1 (1)
- Perfectionism (1)
- Political Liberalism (1)
- Political conception of the person (1)
- Race-based preferences (1)
- Rawls (1)
- Remediation (1)
- Rightful position (1)
- SCOTUS (1)
- Scrutiny (1)
- Segregation (1)
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Jurisprudence
Pursuing Diversity: From Education To Employment, Amy L. Wax
Pursuing Diversity: From Education To Employment, Amy L. Wax
All Faculty Scholarship
A central pillar of the Supreme Court’s educational affirmative-action jurisprudence is that the pedagogical benefits of being educated with students from diverse backgrounds are sufficiently “compelling” to justify some degree of race-conscious selection in university admissions.
This essay argues that the blanket permission to advance educational diversity, defensible or not, should not be extended to employment. The purpose of the workplace is not pedagogical. Rather, employees are hired and paid to do a job, deliver a service, produce a product, and complete specified tasks efficiently and effectively. Whether race-conscious practices for the purpose of creating a more diverse workforce will …
The Ironies Of Affirmative Action, Kermit Roosevelt Iii
The Ironies Of Affirmative Action, Kermit Roosevelt Iii
All Faculty Scholarship
The Supreme Court’s most recent confrontation with race-based affirmative action, Fisher v. University of Texas, did not live up to people’s expectations—or their fears. The Court did not explicitly change the current approach in any substantial way. It did, however, signal that it wants race-based affirmative action to be subject to real strict scrutiny, not the watered-down version featured in Grutter v. Bollinger. That is a significant signal, because under real strict scrutiny, almost all race-based affirmative action programs are likely unconstitutional. This is especially true given the conceptual framework the Court has created for such programs—the way …
The Educational Autonomy Of Perfectionist Religious Groups In A Liberal State, Mark D. Rosen
The Educational Autonomy Of Perfectionist Religious Groups In A Liberal State, Mark D. Rosen
All Faculty Scholarship
This Article draws upon, but reworks, John Rawls’ framework from Political Liberalism to determine the degree of educational autonomy that illiberal perfectionist religious groups ought to enjoy in a liberal state. I start by arguing that Rawls mistakenly concludes that political liberalism flatly cannot accommodate Perfectionists, and that his misstep is attributable to two errors: (1) Rawls utilizes an overly restrictive “political conception of the person” in determining who participates in the original position, and (2) Rawls overlooks the possibility of a “federalist” basic political structure that can afford significant political autonomy to different groups within a single country. With …
The Desegregation Dilemma: A Vote For Voluntarism, Frank Goodman
The Desegregation Dilemma: A Vote For Voluntarism, Frank Goodman
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
De Facto School Segregation: A Constitutional And Empirical Analysis, Frank I. Goodman
De Facto School Segregation: A Constitutional And Empirical Analysis, Frank I. Goodman
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.