Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Administrative law judges (1)
- Administrative proceedings (1)
- Alaska (1)
- Company legal issue (1)
- FEHA (1)
-
- Fair Employment and Housing Act (1)
- Government regulation (1)
- Herald Company (1)
- Legislative intent (1)
- Lind (1)
- McClung v. Employment Development Department (1)
- Press exclusion (1)
- Press relations (1)
- Retroactive judicial decisions (1)
- Retroactivity (1)
- Sexual harassment (1)
- Unemployment benefits (1)
- Unemployment compensation (1)
- Unemployment insurance (1)
- Unemployment insurance compensation hearings (1)
- Weisenberg (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Jurisprudence
Exclusion Of The Press: Herald Company Inc. V. Weisenberg, N.Y. Supreme Court Appellate Division -- First Department
Exclusion Of The Press: Herald Company Inc. V. Weisenberg, N.Y. Supreme Court Appellate Division -- First Department
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Unemployment Compensation: Lola A. Lind V. Employment Security Division, Department Of Labor, State Of Alaska - Supreme Court Of Alaska - March 14, 1980, Supreme Court Of Alaska
Unemployment Compensation: Lola A. Lind V. Employment Security Division, Department Of Labor, State Of Alaska - Supreme Court Of Alaska - March 14, 1980, Supreme Court Of Alaska
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Turning Back The Clock: The California Supreme Court's Decision In Mcclung V. Employment Development Department And The Difficulty Of Determining Legislative Intent In Retroactive Rulemaking , Jeffrey R. Groendal
Turning Back The Clock: The California Supreme Court's Decision In Mcclung V. Employment Development Department And The Difficulty Of Determining Legislative Intent In Retroactive Rulemaking , Jeffrey R. Groendal
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
Against the backdrop of McClung, this note will explore the principle of retroactivity, tracing its development at the national level in the U.S. Supreme Court and at the state level with respect to California courts. Part II of this note addresses the history and development of jurisprudence on retroactivity, focusing on the traditional roles of the Judicial and Legislative Branches and the major cases of both the U.S. Supreme Court and California courts on retroactivity. Part III sets out the facts of McClung. Part IV analyzes and critiques the court's opinions in McClung, with a separate analysis of the history …