Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Equal Protection Clause (2)
- Adarand Constructors Inc. v. Pena (1)
- Affirmative Action (1)
- Affirmative action (1)
- Appellate discretion (1)
-
- Appellate process (1)
- Appellate review (1)
- Brown vs. Board of Education (1)
- Constitution (1)
- Constitutional Theory (1)
- Constitutional law (1)
- Countermajoritarian Difficulty (1)
- Courts (1)
- Decisionmaking (1)
- Due Process Clause (1)
- Fourteenth Amendment (1)
- Gender (1)
- Individual rights (1)
- Judicial Administration (1)
- Judicial Intervention (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Legal Profession (1)
- Lesser life (1)
- Lochner v. New York (1)
- Majoritarianism (1)
- Marbury v. Madison (1)
- Modern Constitutional Republic (1)
- Non-final orders (1)
- One Case at a Time: Judicial Minimalism on the Supreme Court (1)
- Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 15 of 15
Full-Text Articles in Jurisprudence
Discretionary Appellate Review Of Non-Final Orders: It’S Time To Change The Rules, Howard B. Eisenberg, Alan B. Morrison
Discretionary Appellate Review Of Non-Final Orders: It’S Time To Change The Rules, Howard B. Eisenberg, Alan B. Morrison
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
This article discusses the uncertainty of United States Courts of Appeals jurisdiction over non-final orders.
Unpublished Opinions: A Comment, Richard S. Arnold
Unpublished Opinions: A Comment, Richard S. Arnold
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
The Honorable Richard S. Arnold gives a federal appellate judge’s perspective of the unpublished opinions debate.
The Democracy-Forcing Constitution, Neal Devins
The Democracy-Forcing Constitution, Neal Devins
Michigan Law Review
During my freshman year in college, I was told not to judge a book by its cover. The book in question - Lolita; the cover suggested something quite salacious. My professor explained that a soldier, who had purchased Lolita to work out some of the kinks of military life, found himself tossing the book out, proclaiming in disgust "Literature!" Well, I cannot claim precisely the same reaction to Cass Sunstein's One Case at a Time (my expectations were lower than the soldier's). Nevertheless, for those expecting a lefty defense of judicial restraint, One Case at a Time is not your …
Judicial Intervention In A Twenty-First Century Republic: Shuffling Deck Chairs On The Titanic?, Kristofor J. Hammond
Judicial Intervention In A Twenty-First Century Republic: Shuffling Deck Chairs On The Titanic?, Kristofor J. Hammond
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Is Progressive Constitutionalism Possible?, Robin West
Is Progressive Constitutionalism Possible?, Robin West
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
Progressivism is in part a particular moral and political response to the sadness of lesser lives, lives unnecessarily diminished by economic, psychic and physical insecurity in the midst of a society or world that offers plenty. This insecurity is unjust and should end; the suffering should be alleviated, and those lives should be enriched. To do so must be one of the goals of a morally just or justifiable state. Not all suffering and not all lesser lives, of course, give rise to such a response. The suffering attendant to accident, disease, war and happenstance is neither entirely chargeable to …
The Architecture Of Judicial Independence, Stephen B. Burbank
The Architecture Of Judicial Independence, Stephen B. Burbank
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Budweiser Or Budweiser, 32 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1251 (1999), Jitka Smith
Budweiser Or Budweiser, 32 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1251 (1999), Jitka Smith
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
What Spending Clause? - (Or The President's Paramour): An Examination Of The Views Of Hamilton, Madison, And Story On Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 Of The United States Constitution, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 81 (1999), Jeffrey T. Renz
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Little Theory Is A Dangerous Thing: The Myth Of Adjudicative Retroactivity, Kermit Roosevelt Iii
A Little Theory Is A Dangerous Thing: The Myth Of Adjudicative Retroactivity, Kermit Roosevelt Iii
All Faculty Scholarship
The article analyzes the question of the retroactive effect of judicial decisions. It surveys the history of retroactivity doctrine to demonstrate that the current approach to retroactivity jurisprudence is a consequence of the Warren Court's adoption of the principle that parties should be governed by the law in effect at the time of their actions. This principle leads to a theoretical framework that suffers from serious difficulties. In particular, it is unable to distinguish between cases presented on direct and collateral review, and consequently unable to reach a satisfactory treatment of habeas petitions based on changes in law. The article …
Agency, Equality, And Antidiscrimination Law , Tracy E. Higgins, Laura A. Rosenbury
Agency, Equality, And Antidiscrimination Law , Tracy E. Higgins, Laura A. Rosenbury
Faculty Scholarship
The Supreme Court increasingly has interpreted the Equal Protection Clause as a mandate for the state to treat citizens as if they were equal-as a limitation on the state's ability to draw distinctions on the basis of characteristics such as race and, to a lesser extent, gender. In the context of race, the Court has struck down not only race-specific policies designed to harm the historically oppressed, but race conscious policies designed to foster racial equality. Although in theory the Court has left open the possibility that benign uses of race may be constitutional under some set of facts, in …
Federal Circuit's Forgotten Lessons: Annealing New Forms Of Intellectual Property Through Consolidated Appellate Jurisdiction, 32 J. Marshall L. Rev. 581 (1999), Chris J. Katopis
Federal Circuit's Forgotten Lessons: Annealing New Forms Of Intellectual Property Through Consolidated Appellate Jurisdiction, 32 J. Marshall L. Rev. 581 (1999), Chris J. Katopis
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Licensed To Steal: Has Sovereign Immunity Gone Too Far, 32 J. Marshall L. Rev. 779 (1999), Sulaiman M. Qazi
Licensed To Steal: Has Sovereign Immunity Gone Too Far, 32 J. Marshall L. Rev. 779 (1999), Sulaiman M. Qazi
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
When To Hear The Hearsay: A Proposal For A New Rule Of Evidence Designed To Protect The Constitutional Right Of The Criminally Accused To Confront The Witnesses Against Her, 32 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1287 (1999), Scott A. Smith
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Impeaching A Jury Verdict, Juror Misconduct, And Related Issues: A View From The Bench Essay, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 145 (1999), Denise M. O'Malley
Impeaching A Jury Verdict, Juror Misconduct, And Related Issues: A View From The Bench Essay, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 145 (1999), Denise M. O'Malley
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Is The Excessive Fines Clause Excessively Kind To Money Launderers, Drug Dealers, And Tax Evaders, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 243 (1999), Ann Jennings Maron
Is The Excessive Fines Clause Excessively Kind To Money Launderers, Drug Dealers, And Tax Evaders, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 243 (1999), Ann Jennings Maron
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.