Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- 2004 Supreme Court term (1)
- American History (1)
- Chemerinsky (1)
- Chief justice (1)
- Composition of the court (1)
-
- Congress enforcement power (1)
- Congressional authority (1)
- Conservative court (1)
- Constitutional rulings (1)
- Erwin Chemerinsky (1)
- Executive authority (1)
- Federal power (1)
- Federal statute (1)
- Fourteenth amendment (1)
- Gonzales v. Raich (1)
- Ineffective assistance of counsel (1)
- Judicial activism (1)
- Judicial deference (1)
- Justice Breyer (1)
- Justice Scalia (1)
- Legislators’ lawsuits (1)
- McCreary County v. ACLU (1)
- Moderate court (1)
- New justices (1)
- Political Question (1)
- Progressive court (1)
- Rehnquist (1)
- Rehnquist Court (1)
- Rehnquist era (1)
- Revised federalism (1)
- Publication
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Jurisprudence
Look Back At The Rehnquist Era And An Overview Of The 2004 Supreme Court Term, Erwin Chemerinsky
Look Back At The Rehnquist Era And An Overview Of The 2004 Supreme Court Term, Erwin Chemerinsky
Erwin Chemerinsky
No abstract provided.
Executive Action And Nonaction, Tom Campbell
Executive Action And Nonaction, Tom Campbell
Tom Campbell
Action by the executive can be challenged by a party with standing, and there is usually no shortage of such parties. The executive’s failure to act, however, is much more difficult to submit to judicial scrutiny. I propose that standards for reviewing such nonaction are available under precedent of the Administrative Procedure Act, and under severability analysis. That is, a reviewing court can determine whether the executive’s failure to enforce part of a law leaves the rest of the law to operate meaningfully as Congress intended (akin to severability analysis), and APA precedent can guide courts to determine whether nonaction …